Chiefs Chiefs on verge of a deal with Andy Reid (merged) - Page 192

Carlota69 · 11:02 PM

I just saw it on his Facebook status...

UPDATE:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter

Update from @mortreport: Cards visit with Andy Reid is off, Chiefs have not scheduled other visits with candidates, hoping to wrap deal Fri.

Exoter175 · 01-03-2013, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

jd1020 · 01-03-2013, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

Shutup, idiot.

KCrockaholic · 01-03-2013, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

Sorter · 01-03-2013, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

So, by this are you saying that keeping Houston at DE and moving Tamba to either the Will or Sam pos is plausible?

Because it isn't. Houston is a SAM in the 4-3 for most philosophies.

KC Hawks · 01-03-2013, 01:13 AM

I would prefer we stayed with the 3-4 (more agressive, of course), but our defense isn't good enough for me to be too bothered if we switched to a 4-3.

**TimeForWasp** · 01-03-2013, 01:13 AM

I love me some McCluster

RunKC · 01-03-2013, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

If we go to the 4-3 I would like to see Justin Houston play the same position Von Miller does. I think he'd be a good fit.

I'd like to see us sign a guy like Cliff Avril or go after Osi Umenyiora.

I think the 4-3 could be good for Tyson Jackson and Dontari Poe. Those guys can be good run stuffers and I think lining those guys up in the A gap would bring good results up the middle.

FloridaMan88 · 01-03-2013, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

How does Matt's TD:TO ratio compare to Dexter's this year?

Eat a bag of dicks.

So your argument is that because McCluster has a better TD to TO ratio than Matt Cassel this year, McCluster is a "playmaker" and a keeper?

The only way you can spin McCluster as a "playmaker" is to compare him to Matt Freaking Cassel? Why don't you compare him to Mark Sanchez??

And for the record McCluster had 1 TD and 2 Turnovers this year.

That would again be consistent with his career ratio of having twice the # of turnovers as TD's.

Another fail on your part.

Exoter175 · 01-03-2013, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Shutup, idiot.

Eat a bag of dicks inbred.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

So, by this are you saying that keeping Houston at DE and moving Tamba to either the Will or Sam pos is plausible?

Because it isn't. Houston is a SAM in the 4-3 for most philosophies.

No, Tamba is the only one of the two that can play the DE position effectively in the 3-4. And I don't want us to go to a ****ing 4-3, we don't have the players to do it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks

I would prefer we stayed with the 3-4 (more agressive, of course), but our defense isn't good enough for me to be too bothered if we switched to a 4-3.

This, minus the switching part.

jd1020 · 01-03-2013, 01:16 AM

Are you guys surprised by the lack of intelligence from a person who thinks the Chiefs should draft a ILB #1 just because he's the "consensus best ILB?"

FloridaMan88 · 01-03-2013, 01:17 AM

Exoter's argument for why McCluster is a good player: He has less turnovers than Matt Cassel.

That is quite funny.

Sorter · 01-03-2013, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175

Eat a bag of dicks inbred.

No, Tamba is the only one of the two that can play the DE position effectively in the 3-4. And I don't want us to go to a ****ing 4-3, we don't have the players to do it.

This, minus the switching part.

What in the ****ing ****? No he can't. He isn't a 5, 4, and 3 tech player. He's a 7/9 off the edge as an OLB. He can't be a 3-4 DE.

DaWolf · 01-03-2013, 01:18 AM

Looks like Ron Wolf is advising Spanos on his hires in San Diego. Perhaps if they are interested in Reid, it is because of Wolf:

Quote:

Wolf oversaw Green Bay when Mike Holmgren and Mike Sherman were hired as head coaches.

He said the key to make the best hire is interviewing as many candidates as possible, waiting for the one who steps in and "just knocks your socks off."

"That happened to me a couple of times," Wolf said. "It should have happened to me one more time. I had the guy right there, and I was too stupid to realize what I was hearing."

The guy?

Former Eagles coach Andy Reid.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/...ers-gm-search/

Exoter175 · 01-03-2013, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus

So your argument is that because McCluster has a better TD to TO ratio than Matt Cassel this year, McCluster is a "playmaker" and a keeper?

The only way you can spin McCluster as a "playmaker" is to compare him to Matt Freaking Cassel? Why don't you compare him to Mark Sanchez??

And for the record McCluster had 1 TD and 2 Turnovers this year.

That would again be consistent with his career ratio of having twice the # of turnovers as TD's.

Another fail on your part.

No, I'm not using the comparison to Cassel as my basis, I didn't even use TD:TO ratios as a basis for comparison.

TD:TO comparisons aren't even a measurable science for a guy in his position, the only measurable is how he's used, when he's used, and what he does with the ball when he's used. A 1:2 TD:TO ratio this year isn't tragic considering the state of the Chiefs which you idiots seem to keep forgetting he plays for. I mean, how many TD's did we score this year all total that weren't rushing TD's?

LAUGHABLE, yet you guys have yet to compare McCluster to the rest of the Chiefs like I asked you to.

Scared?

**RealSNR** · 01-03-2013, 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter

What in the ****ing ****? No he can't. He isn't a 5, 4, and 3 tech player. He's a 7/9 off the edge as an OLB. He can't be a 3-4 DE.

Is this a Blackbob mult? Confirmed?

01-03-2013, 01:13 AM	#2870
KC Hawks Veteran Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: The West Side Casino cash: $-2165690	I would prefer we stayed with the 3-4 (more agressive, of course), but our defense isn't good enough for me to be too bothered if we switched to a 4-3.
Posts: 3,298

01-03-2013, 01:13 AM	#2871
TimeForWasp Sprinkle in some Mahomes Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Butte Montana Casino cash: $7658507	I love me some McCluster Attached Thumbnails __________________ Posted via Slingshot using Rocks eBay sniper
Posts: 8,271

01-03-2013, 01:16 AM	#2875
jd1020 In Search of a Life Join Date: Nov 2010 Casino cash: $7042645	Are you guys surprised by the lack of intelligence from a person who thinks the Chiefs should draft a ILB #1 just because he's the "consensus best ILB?"
Posts: 24,501

01-03-2013, 01:17 AM	#2876
FloridaMan88 Mahomes: We Are All Witnesses Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $-507094	Exoter's argument for why McCluster is a good player: He has less turnovers than Matt Cassel. That is quite funny.
Posts: 49,663