Football Glazer: KC called Cleveland regarding Quinn. - Page 3

BigVE · 09-21-2008, 10:23 AM

Just reported it on FOX NFL Sunday...NO LINK. Hmmmm.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan · 09-21-2008, 10:39 AM

It doesn't matter who we bring in as a QB as long as Herm and Dick Curl are here.

How hard is it to hand off up the middle twice, throw a swing pass and go sit on the bench as the punter trots out onto the field?

kcxiv · 09-21-2008, 10:39 AM

Leave it up to Hootie for something crazy.

BigChiefFan · 09-21-2008, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

older?! Haha. He's what, 25??

Yeah, we'll get a top pick and if we use it on a QB we're going to commit $40M guaranteed...

I'll take Quinn and his 5 year, $9M contract and potential to be a franchise QB over our #1 overall and a 3rd round pick.

We could have Sam Bradford and a quality RG instead. You don't rebuild giving up draft picks for a 25 year old QB with just as many question marks as a rookie, IMO, especially behind this O-Line.

Hootie · 09-21-2008, 10:40 AM

What does this franchise need more than anything? A QB.

If we land the #1 overall (which is likely), who will we draft? Probably Stafford.

Do you guys really like Stafford ($40M guaranteed) more than Quinn (5 years, $9M)...?

Not me. They have similar potential if you ask me. Quinn has learned what life is like in the NFL for two years and is a hell of a QB...I'd be ecstatic if we got him for a 1st and a 2nd...

He is the most logic piece for this franchise...nothing makes more sense than doing anything possible to acquire Brady Quinn.

ArrowheadHawk · 09-21-2008, 10:41 AM

I just don't see see it no way is quin worth a number one pick to a rebuilding franchise.

**banyon** · 09-21-2008, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

There is no difference between LJ and Jamal Lewis...other than the fact Jamal Lewis might be better.

I was thinking LJ was younger than Jamal, but he's really not. I forgot how early Jamal came out from Tennessee.

Of course LJ does have less wear on the tire and has not been to federal prison, so there are some differences for you.

**The Bad Guy** · 09-21-2008, 10:41 AM

The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

kcxiv · 09-21-2008, 10:41 AM

I rather have Rey Mualuaga.

Hootie · 09-21-2008, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

We could have Sam Bradford and a quality RG instead. You don't rebuild giving up draft picks for a 25 year old QB with just as many question marks as a rookie, IMO, especially behind this O-Line.

We could pay a QB like Tom Brady that has the same potential as Brady Quinn and hold on to that 3rd round pick and draft Brad Cottam.

Yaaay.

kcxiv · 09-21-2008, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

The thing is they will. If Derrick Anderson is a stud. They will want to get something from Quinn. Why would they have their number 1 pick just sit there and rott? in the end it hurts them more then anything else.

**Skip Towne** · 09-21-2008, 10:43 AM

Letting Dick Curl coach a top flight QB is like letting Hootie work on your Maserati.

ArrowheadHawk · 09-21-2008, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

Yes, either this or we could trade back up into the first to get a QB about the spot where Quin or Rodgers dropped to.

**banyon** · 09-21-2008, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

I understand that they want a #1, but not THE #1, which is probably what we'll have. Maybe we need to package some of our other picks or players and get a mid 1st rounder to trade.

Hootie · 09-21-2008, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk

I just don't see see it no way is quin worth a number one pick to a rebuilding franchise.

I only agree if our rebuilding franchise doesn't plan on drafting a QB with our top 5 pick.

If we take Oher, I'm fine with passing on Quinn and taking a QB in 2009.

If we take Stafford, or Bradford, or Sanchez or whoever in the top 5...and pay them like Tom Brady...if we had a CHANCE at Quinn and passed because we wanted one of these guys instead I won't be happy.

BigChiefFan · 09-21-2008, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

What does this franchise need more than anything? A QB.

If we land the #1 overall (which is likely), who will we draft? Probably Stafford.

Do you guys really like Stafford ($40M guaranteed) more than Quinn (5 years, $9M)...?

Not me. They have similar potential if you ask me. Quinn has learned what life is like in the NFL for two years and is a hell of a QB...I'd be ecstatic if we got him for a 1st and a 2nd...

He is the most logic piece for this franchise...nothing makes more sense than doing anything possible to acquire Brady Quinn.

I'm not sold that Stafford will be the first QB taken next year.

09-21-2008, 10:23 AM
BigVE Veteran Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: centralKs Casino cash: $10005250	Glazer: KC called Cleveland regarding Quinn. Just reported it on FOX NFL Sunday...NO LINK. Hmmmm.
Posts: 4,829

09-21-2008, 10:39 AM	#31
Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan I am Number Six Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Columbia, MD, USA Casino cash: $-1040000	It doesn't matter who we bring in as a QB as long as Herm and Dick Curl are here. How hard is it to hand off up the middle twice, throw a swing pass and go sit on the bench as the punter trots out onto the field? __________________ One of the lowest PPD of any of the original members of the Planet . . . and proud of it. My web site My writer's page
Posts: 6,713

09-21-2008, 10:39 AM	#32
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8807996	Leave it up to Hootie for something crazy.
Posts: 29,110

09-21-2008, 10:40 AM	#34
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	What does this franchise need more than anything? A QB. If we land the #1 overall (which is likely), who will we draft? Probably Stafford. Do you guys really like Stafford ($40M guaranteed) more than Quinn (5 years, $9M)...? Not me. They have similar potential if you ask me. Quinn has learned what life is like in the NFL for two years and is a hell of a QB...I'd be ecstatic if we got him for a 1st and a 2nd... He is the most logic piece for this franchise...nothing makes more sense than doing anything possible to acquire Brady Quinn.
Posts: 56,356

09-21-2008, 10:41 AM	#35
ArrowheadHawk Rock Chalk! Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Topeka, KS Casino cash: $7764961	I just don't see see it no way is quin worth a number one pick to a rebuilding franchise.
Posts: 15,676

09-21-2008, 10:41 AM	#37
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9293645	The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid. They gave up a #1 to get him. If you want him, you have to go above that 1. Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB? __________________
Posts: 23,215

09-21-2008, 10:43 AM	#41
Skip Towne Supporter Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: T-Town Casino cash: $10004900	Letting Dick Curl coach a top flight QB is like letting Hootie work on your Maserati.
Posts: 69,689