2024 Draft - trade multiple picks to Cardinals to get Marvin Harrison Jr.

[scho63]

All I hear and see makes Marvin Harrison Jr a no-miss draft pick.

Like all picks, there are no guarantees.

If you're Veach, do you trade multiple picks, maybe 3 high rounders to the Cards for the #2 pick in the draft. They need MANY players to rebuild, not one superstar.

Good idea, bad idea or interesting idea?

[scho63]

Originally Posted by TwistedChief

It would be at least 3 1's, 2 2's, and more than that.

It would be insanely stupid.

But we lost yesterday so make the trade NOW!

If you knew you were getting a Justin Jefferson or Jerry Rice level of player, it is far from insanely stupid.

The price may be far too high but certainly worth thinking about.

Kelce has little time left and we have NOTHING after him, not a thing.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Thank God Veach and Reid are in charge and not the natives...

[scho63]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

Thank God Veach and Reid are in charge and not the natives...

Veach has done some great things but lets be real as he and Andy ****ed up WR.

All the "natives" here said our WRs suck.

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by scho63

If you knew you were getting a Justin Jefferson or Jerry Rice level of player, it is far from insanely stupid.

The price may be far too high but certainly worth thinking about.

Kelce has little time left and we have NOTHING after him, not a thing.

Even though he’s a tremendous prospect, you don’t know what you’re getting.

If he busts, Veach would have ****ed the franchise. Worth it for a QB, but not for anything else.

Address WR in volume. Ideally, one big FA, one moderate FA, one early pick, one late pick. One or two are bound to hit.

[Bowser]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

Thank God Veach and Reid are in charge and not the natives...

THAT SAID -

I do feel that the front office felt like Mahomes could make average players good (and save some cap for other areas *coughHopkinscough*), and well, even Mahomes can't work miracles at a 100% clip.

[Why Not?]

Yeah I do think it is an interesting idea, to answer directly. I probably wouldn't do it but if the Cardinals called, you would have to at least have the discussion. Love Veach but to this point, he can't draft WR (jury out but pointing to promising on Rice, to be fair). If you had the opportunity to get the next "generational" WR, it would be at least intoxicating to consider.

[Stryker]

No that's just crazy. Do move up as far as Veach sees fit to get a grade A WR though. This team does not need another Hill, Chase or Jefferson - they just need WRs that can catch the damn ball!

[Why Not?]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051

Even though he’s a tremendous prospect, you don’t know what you’re getting.

If he busts, Veach would have ****ed the franchise. Worth it for a QB, but not for anything else.

Address WR in volume. Ideally, one big FA, one moderate FA, one early pick, one late pick. One or two are bound to hit.

This is probably the smarter play

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by Why Not?

This is probably the smarter play

We’re due for that type of offseason.

We’ve seen Veach hit every other position group hard at times, except receiver (I’ll include TE). I’m sure a lot of that has to due with inheriting Hill and Kelce.

Tim to build up the weapons for the next phase of Mahomes’s career. We’ve done all we can with Kelce and whatever has been around him.

Kelce will still be a piece, but he needs pressure taken off of him.

I’m more excited for this upcoming offseason than any of our recent ones. Really interested to see what we put around Mahomes.

[mr. tegu]

The Cardinals would never pass on him. That said we need to trade up and get a top flight WR. Waiting until 32 is not an option either though. Better trade up for one.

[Stryker]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051

Even though he’s a tremendous prospect, you don’t know what you’re getting.

If he busts, Veach would have ****ed the franchise. Worth it for a QB, but not for anything else.

Address WR in volume. Ideally, one big FA, one moderate FA, one early pick, one late pick. One or two are bound to hit.

What is so funny is we had a boat load of WR's during TC that all of us were excited about and then that turned into unsure/voting for and NOW WE need WRs! That is ridiculous! Now, WE START OVER! That pisses me off.

[Why Not?]

Originally Posted by Stryker

What is so funny is we had a boat load of WR's during TC that all of us were excited about and then that turned into unsure/voting for and NOW WE need WRs! That is ridiculous! Now, WE START OVER! That pisses me off.

It is ironic. Turns out, they all suck! LOL. Well, Rice looks like a keeper and Toney is useful for about 3 touches a week, but the rest can hit the road.

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by Stryker

What is so funny is we had a boat load of WR's during TC that all of us were excited about and then that turned into unsure/voting for and NOW WE need WRs! That is ridiculous! Now, WE START OVER! That pisses me off.

All we can judge is how they look in preseason games and what we hear from camp.

Remember Derek Carr torching McDuffie in preseason?

Those games aren’t always an accurate look at what we’ve got.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

What if we make it to the Superbowl, hell, what if we win it? Trade away the picks still?

[scho63]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

What if we make it to the Superbowl, hell, what if we win it? Trade away the picks still?

Do we win the Super Bowl 17-16 because our D plays great and we only score 3 points in 2nd half and hold on?

We need WRs unless in the last 7 games we go from worst to first in drops.