****Our Wide Receivers Suck- Official Thread****

[Sofa King]

They can’t get open, they drop passes in their hands, their jet sweeps are slow and terrible. These guys are not good.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

Why are they better?

Nico Brown struggled last year with "bad QB play", Noah Brown is a journeyman 2017 7th round pick and Tank Dell is a 3rd round pick this year. They are all having good years and what's the common denominator? CJ... Maybe it's because there is no tape on CJ or the Houston offense, but to deny he's making this guys look way better than they should is intellectually dishonest.

Last year catching passes from Mahomes:

MVS, Skyy and Toney: 1108 yards

Last year catching passes from Dak and Davis Mills:

Noah Brown and Nico Collins: 1036 yards


Yeah they're better.

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Well, I mean...are we going to take out Kelce's targets every year, then?

Well you're gping to have to very, very soon. Maybe as soon as 2025.

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by Bump

there are people actually saying that? wow

Based on the logic and reasoning they are using....yes. many.

[MahomesMagic]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

Who would you have signed? And, what would that have done to the current roster? I anxiously await your answer.

I don't believe you.

You don't care what anyone thinks because you are just here to put lipstick on a pig.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by -King-

Last year catching passes from Mahomes:

MVS, Skyy and Toney: 1108 yards

Last year catching passes from Dak and Davis Mills:

Noah Brown and Nico Collins: 1036 yards


Yeah they're better.

So MVS had more yards than either of them, and Sky was a rookie, and those two had 99 yards less than Nico and Noah. Toney didn't play until the last 7 games with limited snaps...

So Sky and MVS 937 Brown and Nico 1036, fairly equivalent...

This year Nico and Brown on pace for 2000 yards with CJ throwing to them. Again, offense and CJ are new and the league could catch up, but he is making these JAGs, previous 500 yard a year tops guys, look great.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic

I don't believe you.

You don't care what anyone thinks because you are just here to put lipstick on a pig.

Nice tapout... You know who the FA's were, so who should we have signed to be our #1. You are blaming them for not replacing Ju Ju, so what should they have done?

[-King-]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

So MVS had more yards than either of them, and Sky was a rookie, and those two had 99 yards less than Nico and Noah. Toney didn't play until the last 7 games with limited snaps...

So Sky and MVS 937 Brown and Nico 1036, fairly equivalent...

This year Nico and Brown on pace for 2000 yards with CJ throwing to them. Again, offense and CJ are new and the league could catch up, but he is making these JAGs, previous 500 yard a year tops guys, look great.

How many yards would our WRs have with CJ throwing to them instead of Mahomes?

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by -King-

How many yards would our WRs have with CJ throwing to them instead of Mahomes?

That's the question, right? Is it our offensive scheme without Bienemey and trying to get it figure out? Is it defensive coordinator's have limited experience against the Houston scheme and offense? I fail to believe JuJu was the glue that held this offense together. I think it is a culmination of things and not just the WR's. Again, I think Pat and Andy will get it figured out as the talent isn't so void that it can't happen.

[MahomesMagic]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

Nice tapout... You know who the FA's were, so who should we have signed to be our #1. You are blaming them for not replacing Ju Ju, so what should they have done?

Changing the subject does not make the WRs better.

We already know that every WR not signed by KC was washed and every young WR not proven. Only WRs who were young, proven playmakers that would take 50 percent off were deemed acceptable to the I Love Punting Cult.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic

Changing the subject does not make the WRs better.

We already know that every WR not signed by KC was washed and every young WR not proven. Only WRs who were young, proven playmakers that would take 50 percent off were deemed acceptable to the I Love Punting Cult.

No, you are the ones blaming Veach for not replacing JuJu... Who would you have picked up? It's not that hard of a question.

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

No, you are the ones blaming Veach for not replacing JuJu... Who would you have picked up? It's not that hard of a question.

Throw a dart. Literally anybody would have worked.

[MahomesMagic]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

No, you are the ones blaming Veach for not replacing JuJu... Who would you have picked up? It's not that hard of a question.

We already did this and every WR not on the Chiefs was considered old, washed, a dud, a troublemaker, too inexperienced, not proven, etc


So every WR brought up was considered not good enough to take snaps from Skyy Moore or Justin Watson or MVS.

[Chief Pagan]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Well, I mean...are we going to take out Kelce's targets every year, then?

If you want to post a stat that shows Mahomes is awesome, there is a Mahomes thread.

If you are posting in the WR sucks thread, maybe the stats should reflect the WRs?

[-King-]

To save everybody time and words, here's now if works

A: We could have gotten this receiver, he's doing good on his current team
B: No, he wouldn't have worked here for this reason ____. What he's currently doing wouldn't translate to the Chiefs.

A: Ok this other receiver is also doing well on his team, we should have gotten him
B: No, clearly he wouldn't have done well here because of this reason ____....

A: Oh well, how about this other receiver, he's not doing great on his team but I think he would have been good for us
B: You wanted him? Look at what he's doing on his current team! And you wanted him?!? Clearly this means you didn't appreciate us winning the Superbowl last year and that you think we can't win the Superbowl this year and you're not a true fan!

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by -King-

To save everybody time and words, here's now if works

A: We could have gotten this receiver, he's doing good on his current team
B: No, he wouldn't have worked here for this reason ____. What he's currently doing wouldn't translate to the Chiefs.

A: Ok this other receiver is also doing well on his team, we should have gotten him
B: No, clearly he wouldn't have done well here because of this reason ____....

A: Oh well, how about this other receiver, he's not doing great on his team but I think he would have been good for us
B: You wanted him? Look at what he's doing on his current team! And you wanted him?!? Clearly this means you didn't appreciate us winning the Superbowl last year and that you think we can't win the Superbowl this year and you're not a true fan!

No, that's not how it works. There were a set number of free agents that were available, they were all signed by other teams. Choose any of them you think would have been a good fit here and what they would have cost based on their current deal. Mahomes Magic and other are insisting we suck and screwed up because we didn't replace JuJu. Well, who would they have signed if they were GM. This same crowd is insufferable miserable twats because we aren't a top 3 offense even though we are the #1 seed and have the best record in the AFC. They can't enjoy the Chiefs without constant negative complaining. Those of us who think it's more than "the wide receivers suck" are fairly content, happy and optimistic that we will be better and hitting on all cylinders in Jan. if we avoid the injury bug. There is a vast difference between the two camps.