Chiefs Chiefs meeting with Kendall Wright today - Page 6

RunKC · 03-22-2018, 06:19 AM

Goddamn what a great receiving core this is if we get this guy

**Baby Lee** · 03-22-2018, 09:31 AM

Wayne Fontes aspirations!!

pugsnotdrugs19 · 03-22-2018, 09:33 AM

I can’t see Conley really ever playing in the slot personally. He just doesn’t fit that role at all, and so if he is your #3 WR, you’re forced to put Hill or Watkins in there most of the time.

I want those two split out wide on opposite sides of the field.

**Rausch** · 03-22-2018, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

Wayne Fontes aspirations!!

We should raise our expectations in baby steps.

BABY STEPS.

**The Franchise** · 03-22-2018, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

I can’t see Conley really ever playing in the slot personally. He just doesn’t fit that role at all, and so if he is your #3 WR, you’re forced to put Hill or Watkins in there most of the time.

I want those two split out wide on opposite sides of the field.

Why? In a base two WR set....sure they can play outside. But when we go to 3 WRs...why wouldn't you want Watkins and Conley outside with Hill in the slot? No slot CB is going to cover Hill and you're going to find more mismatches for him that way.

Chiefs=Champions · 03-22-2018, 09:38 AM

I actually really like wright. I think he would be great in the wilson role of outlet and short route receiver.

**Rausch** · 03-22-2018, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Why? In a base two WR set....sure they can play outside. But when we go to 3 WRs...why wouldn't you want Watkins and Conley outside with Hill in the slot? No slot CB is going to cover Hill and you're going to find more mismatches for him that way.

Conley in the slot is a terrible idea.

Based on everything about him. He's a solid blocker in the running game, he's a smart guy but his routes aren't precise, and he doesn't make the contested catch at the NFL level...

chiefzilla1501 · 03-22-2018, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Seems like Veach, whether intentional or not, is trying to balance salary cap spending between offense and defense.

Right now, we still spend more on the defense cap wise than the O.

I don't think it'll be balance. I think he expects the offense to have majority of the payroll eventually and I'm good with that. We aren't looking to be a balanced team, which is how you build around Alex Smith. We are looking to destroy people on offense. I wouldn't doubt it's reid knowing he's better off now building around the passing game than building around a DC who's been inconsistent.

**The Franchise** · 03-22-2018, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

Conley in the slot is a terrible idea.

Based on everything about him. He's a solid blocker in the running game, he's a smart guy but his routes aren't precise, and he doesn't make the contested catch at the NFL level...

Did you quote the wrong post? I didn't say anything about Conley in the slot.

RunKC · 03-22-2018, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Seems like Veach, whether intentional or not, is trying to balance salary cap spending between offense and defense.

Right now, we still spend more on the defense cap wise than the O.

I think it’s more along the lines of depth. Look at what happened after Kelce and Jones got knocked out of the game?

I really hope we sign Watson and Wright bc we need quality depth. What if one one of Kelce, Tyreek or Watkins gets hurt next year? We gonna have Demetrius Harris, Demarcus Robinson or a questionable Chris Conley coming off a major injury be the answer?

**The Franchise** · 03-22-2018, 09:42 AM

Are they planning on restructuring a deal? Because we're going to be getting pretty tight on money unless Veach is going to dump a bunch of picks to move up and get an instant starter.

**Rausch** · 03-22-2018, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Did you quote the wrong post? I didn't say anything about Conley in the slot.

I may have read that too quick.

My bad, I made the assumption you were for it.

Hands up, slowly backing away...

pugsnotdrugs19 · 03-22-2018, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Why? In a base two WR set....sure they can play outside. But when we go to 3 WRs...why wouldn't you want Watkins and Conley outside with Hill in the slot? No slot CB is going to cover Hill and you're going to find more mismatches for him that way.

I’m not saying he can’t play the slot sometimes, but no alignment can put more stress on defenses vertically than Watkins and Tyreek each on the outside of the numbers on each sideline. We need to take advantage of that.

chiefzilla1501 · 03-22-2018, 09:54 AM

If we incorporate more air raid concepts, we'll see a lot more shallow crossers and mesh routes, lots of good opportunity for sweep options, and when going vertical it's not bad to have a guy who can sprint into a route out of the backfield in ways hunt can't. Wright would be a fun gadget for a lot of these things.

mcaj22 · 03-22-2018, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

If we incorporate more air raid concepts, we'll see a lot more shallow crossers and mesh routes, lots of good opportunity for sweep options, and when going vertical it's not bad to have a guy who can sprint into a route out of the backfield in ways hunt can't. Wright would be a fun gadget for a lot of these things.

is Wright a gadget player I thought he was just slow with excellent route running. Basically a WR that can beat zone coverage while Hill and Watkins beat man coverage

ToxSocks · 03-22-2018, 09:57 AM

They're really going all in on Mahomes. Adding Wright to the mix only increases this offenses' flexibility and insures some depth.

If you look at our last two playoff losses, the Chiefs ran out of receivers. Last year the O was rolling until Kelce went down. The loss of Kelce and Conley proved too much.

03-22-2018, 06:19 AM
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $-1410389	Chiefs meeting with Kendall Wright today Goddamn what a great receiving core this is if we get this guy
Posts: 52,064

03-22-2018, 09:31 AM	#76
Baby Lee Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $8038275	Wayne Fontes aspirations!!
Posts: 95,642

03-22-2018, 09:33 AM	#77
pugsnotdrugs19 SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $6639447	I can’t see Conley really ever playing in the slot personally. He just doesn’t fit that role at all, and so if he is your #3 WR, you’re forced to put Hill or Watkins in there most of the time. I want those two split out wide on opposite sides of the field.
Posts: 29,037

03-22-2018, 09:38 AM	#80
Chiefs=Champions Training Camp Hero Join Date: Oct 2006 Casino cash: $8054801	I actually really like wright. I think he would be great in the wilson role of outlet and short route receiver.
Posts: 6,001

03-22-2018, 09:42 AM	#85
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2095047	Are they planning on restructuring a deal? Because we're going to be getting pretty tight on money unless Veach is going to dump a bunch of picks to move up and get an instant starter.
Posts: 92,316

03-22-2018, 09:54 AM	#88
chiefzilla1501 In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $-1545503	If we incorporate more air raid concepts, we'll see a lot more shallow crossers and mesh routes, lots of good opportunity for sweep options, and when going vertical it's not bad to have a guy who can sprint into a route out of the backfield in ways hunt can't. Wright would be a fun gadget for a lot of these things.
Posts: 51,560

03-22-2018, 09:57 AM	#90
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $2133063	They're really going all in on Mahomes. Adding Wright to the mix only increases this offenses' flexibility and insures some depth. If you look at our last two playoff losses, the Chiefs ran out of receivers. Last year the O was rolling until Kelce went down. The loss of Kelce and Conley proved too much. __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 65,925