2018 Free Agents

[Couch-Potato]

Who are you letting walk/cutting/retiring?

http://chiefswire.usatoday.com/2018/...8-free-agents/


Who are you targeting?

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nf...t-tracker?pg=1

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Get ready guys. I think we’ll be making moves

OBJ

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

There’s a wr in New York that’s in a similar situation.

Nah I’m not a fan of putting $40 million of our cap on 2 receivers

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Get ready guys. I think we’ll be making moves

Our pets heads are falling off!

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Nah I’m not a fan of putting $40 million of our cap on 2 receivers

Why?

If they produce and help Mahomes become a legit dude it’ll be worth it

[The Franchise]

. Free agent Paul Richardson hinted he was done in a Saturday social media post.
Richardson cryptically tweeted "one thing I do know is I had a ball in Seattle!" This implies Richardson's time in Seattle has likely come to an end. It was only a matter of time since Richardson is looking for $7 million per year on his next deal and the Seahawks reportedly won't pay more than $5.5 million annually to re-sign him. Without Richardson and Jimmy Graham, Seattle will enter free agency with roughly $30 million in cap space and the second-most available air yards from 2017's production.

Only $7 million a year for Richardson? I’d do that in a heartbeat.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Only $7 million a year for Richardson? I’d do that in a heartbeat.

Yeah, if it’s that for him vs. $12M for Watkins, I’d take Richardson.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Only $7 million a year for Richardson? I’d do that in a heartbeat.

Yea, **** Watkins and those other guys.

Sign Richardson, Tre Boston, E.J. Gaines, and a DE or NT.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Yea, **** Watkins and those other guys.

Sign Richardson, Tre Boston, E.J. Gaines, and a DE or NT.

I’m down with that.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

I must say though that if Richardson only gets $7M, I don’t see how Watkins gets more than $10M. And in that case I’d probably rather have Sammy.

[bigjosh]

Paul Richardson is a gamer. He would be a good fit on this team I think.

And he is only 25.

[patteeu]

Paul Richardson is the guy I thought of when Veach said he'd be a player in the speedy receiver market. He makes more sense than Robinson in that regard. Watkins is a possibility, but Richardson seems more likely.

[Mother****erJones]

I’d be fine with Sheldon and Paul Richardson, NT and another corner.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Paul Richardson is the guy I thought of when Veach said he'd be a player in the speedy receiver market. He makes more sense than Robinson in that regard. Watkins is a possibility, but Richardson seems more likely.

But there’s a lot of smoke surrounding KC and Watkins. So we’ll see what shakes loose

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Who is the top FA CB available now?

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Only $7 million a year for Richardson? I’d do that in a heartbeat.

That seems high for a guy with 1300 career yds with 8 TDs that 700 yds and 6 TDs came last year which of course was his best year. I think the Seahawks have it right in the $5.5M a year.
We could always backload it and make his "guaranteed" money in bonuses so that if he doesn't produce that we can get rid of him without a huge hit to the cap.