Chiefs Mods and Tiggerupperuncle - Page 13

Reerun_KC · 12-24-2016, 04:24 PM

I was informed today via phone that if I want to continue to hang around CP to back off Tiggerupperuncle...

Someone close to the inner mod circle made it clear that he isn't to be messed with regardless....

I got your infraction Tigger. I won't be responding to you, qouting you, engaging in conversation with you or anything going forward.

Point has been made. Merry Christmas CP. See u later.

threebag · 12-24-2016, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Will you show me how to use them?

Merry Christmas buddy!! Enjoy your time with family!

I have sausage fingers but i promise i won't go past my first knuckle

Reerun_KC · 12-24-2016, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02

I have sausage fingers but i promise i won't go past my first knuckle

.

**DaFace** · 12-24-2016, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

You do understand that I was referring to bans from the GDTs only not from the site as a whole.
Bob Dole said specifically that he banned Clay for wishing injury on Smith. I seen the post myself. No I can't remember the thread but Pest can repeatedly do the same thing and.....nothing. I am not saying Bob was right or wrong for what he did. I will say that if one poster can or does get banned for something then any and all posters that do the same behavior should be treated the same/equally.

I think people underestimate how much of Bob Dole's moderating is largely him just getting irritated and not giving a shit.

chiefzilla1501 · 12-24-2016, 11:46 PM

I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.

**DaneMcCloud** · 12-24-2016, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

I seen the post myself

Well holy ****ing shit.

You seen it.

Genious.

**New World Order** · 12-25-2016, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

Batshit crazy because Foles hasn't been playing.

He played well against Indy and Tigerbob starting making excuses as to why he played well.

He's only for the Chiefs if Alex is on the field.

**RealSNR** · 12-25-2016, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.

Nobody turned against staylor. Or splatbass. Or anybody else. Why would they?

Tiger is a douchebag. He's always been a douchebag. He always will be a douchebag whether he liked Alex Smith or not.

splatbass · 12-25-2016, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order

He played well against Indy and Tigerbob starting making excuses as to why he played well.

He's only for the Chiefs if Alex is on the field.

He didn't look good against the Jags. One TD and four FGs. You would have crucified Smith for that.

**New World Order** · 12-25-2016, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

He didn't look good against the Jags. One TD and four FGs. You would have crucified Smith for that.

It's not much different than what we see each week with Alex.

But that wasn't really the point.

kccrow · 12-25-2016, 12:41 AM

And so it... continues...

One guy gets banned for excessive negativity towards a player, posting stats that very adequately prove most of his points. Another gets a pass for excessive positivity, posting stats that don't back it up. Both annoy other people and troll. So why is it that one is banned again?

I think that's kind of the point. I don't think either should be banned. Having and arguing different points of view is not the end of the world. There are far more people somewhere in the middle. There is definitely good and bad about Alex, but I'm not going to get into that here. I think its wrong to ban either person for having a viewpoint.

As for the excessive trolling, well, that's been a CP tradition for as long as I can remember. I read posts on here for damn near a decade before I joined. Nothing has changed, ever. Banning over it now seems a bit redundant.

splatbass · 12-25-2016, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order

It's not much different than what we see each week with Alex.

But that wasn't really the point.

Your double standard was my point.

NJChiefsFan · 12-25-2016, 12:47 AM

It's not just Smith haters that think he is derailing the threads. But I also thought tatoo needed to be reined in a few weeks ago as well as a few other bashers repeating themselves. I'm also in the camp that clay is more harm than good.

I'm not a big ban guy though. I would prefer people ignore this guy because it makes it worse. Let him or whatever poster created him get his desperate attention somewhere else. He absolutely is worse than what neutral people are comparing him to but this could have been tucked away by people ignoring him and it became this. He is one of the most disruptive posters I've seen here but the board made it worse by taking his bait. And bait out absolutely is.

splatbass · 12-25-2016, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan

It's not just Smith haters that think he is derailing the threads. But I also thought tatoo needed to be reined in a few weeks ago as well as a few other bashers repeating themselves. I'm also in the camp that clay is more harm than good.

I'm not a big ban guy though. I would prefer people ignore this guy because it makes it worse. Let him or whatever poster created him get his desperate attention somewhere else. He absolutely is worse than what neutral people are comparing him to but this could have been tucked away by people ignoring him and it became this. He is one of the most disruptive posters I've seen here and others have made it even worse.

I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

NJChiefsFan · 12-25-2016, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

Tiger is one of 3 I've ever put on ignore. What you just described is exactly what I feel right now. I can't get away from him because he is constantly quoted and posts three times in a row.

Reerun_KC · 12-25-2016, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

Swap Tiggerupperuncle for Clay and that's exactly how many feel.

One is banned the other going full Clay. Same as it ever was.

12-24-2016, 04:24 PM
Reerun_KC Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7231160	Mods and Tiggerupperuncle I was informed today via phone that if I want to continue to hang around CP to back off Tiggerupperuncle... Someone close to the inner mod circle made it clear that he isn't to be messed with regardless.... I got your infraction Tigger. I won't be responding to you, qouting you, engaging in conversation with you or anything going forward. Point has been made. Merry Christmas CP. See u later.
Posts: 1,529

12-24-2016, 11:46 PM	#184
chiefzilla1501 In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $-1535503	I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.
Posts: 51,550

12-25-2016, 12:41 AM	#190
kccrow MVP Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Michigan Casino cash: $-1040000	And so it... continues... One guy gets banned for excessive negativity towards a player, posting stats that very adequately prove most of his points. Another gets a pass for excessive positivity, posting stats that don't back it up. Both annoy other people and troll. So why is it that one is banned again? I think that's kind of the point. I don't think either should be banned. Having and arguing different points of view is not the end of the world. There are far more people somewhere in the middle. There is definitely good and bad about Alex, but I'm not going to get into that here. I think its wrong to ban either person for having a viewpoint. As for the excessive trolling, well, that's been a CP tradition for as long as I can remember. I read posts on here for damn near a decade before I joined. Nothing has changed, ever. Banning over it now seems a bit redundant.
Posts: 13,990

12-25-2016, 12:47 AM	#192
NJChiefsFan I've Made a Huge Mistake Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: NJ Casino cash: $4500423	It's not just Smith haters that think he is derailing the threads. But I also thought tatoo needed to be reined in a few weeks ago as well as a few other bashers repeating themselves. I'm also in the camp that clay is more harm than good. I'm not a big ban guy though. I would prefer people ignore this guy because it makes it worse. Let him or whatever poster created him get his desperate attention somewhere else. He absolutely is worse than what neutral people are comparing him to but this could have been tucked away by people ignoring him and it became this. He is one of the most disruptive posters I've seen here but the board made it worse by taking his bait. And bait out absolutely is.
Posts: 12,495