Moooo....

[luv]

....is a lying, cheating asshole. And I'm not the one he cheated on, but the one he cheated with. Gotta love being played for a fool.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

These online tests are nowhere near accurate. Who ever heard of a True-False IQ test? Plus, the average range (on the Stanford Binet) is 90-110. 110 is a good score. How many on here reported a score in that range? So we are all geniouses then? Yeah, right.

In their FAQ's, they say that their AVERAGE score is around 110. That means that they're around 10 points off on average, but who knows how accurate it is.

[ChiefsfaninPA]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

These online tests are nowhere near accurate. Who ever heard of a True-False IQ test? Plus, the average range (on the Stanford Binet) is 90-110. 110 is a good score. How many on here reported a score in that range? So we are all geniouses then? Yeah, right.

I thought to post at Chiefsplanet, one had to be a genious.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by ChiefsfaninPA

I thought to post at Chiefsplanet, one had to be a genious.

I think it's the other way around.

[Skip Towne]

Originally Posted by ChiefsfaninPA

I thought to post at Chiefsplanet, one had to be a genious.

You're right. That would explain these test results.

[Hammock Parties]

Heh heh.

Pastor, did you buy a DVD Writer for your PC?

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

Plus, the average range (on the Stanford Binet) is 90-110.

An average with a range, eh?

That's interesting.

[PastorMikH]

Originally Posted by DaFace

I got a 152 on a retake. I'm pretty sure that these are correct:

1. T
2. T
3. F
4. T
5. T
6. T
7. T
8. F
9. T
10. T
11. T
12. T
13. F
14. F
15. T
16. F
17. T
18. F
19. F
20.F
21. F
22. F
23. F
24. F
25. T
26. T
27. T
28. F
29. T
30. F
31. T
32. F
33. F
34. T
35. T
36. F
37. F
38. F

I had the same answers as you except for #24.

[PastorMikH]

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Heh heh.

Pastor, did you buy a DVD Writer for your PC?

No, one to take the place of the VCR. I have two DVD Burners in the computers, one dual layer that I have yet to use the DL on because of the price of media and a single layer.

This one is a magnavox that I picked up at hillbilly-mart. Our VCR is acting up and since you can't buy a decent VCR anymore I went with the DVDR setup. I have a vid-capture on the desktop but it just doesn't do as well through the PC as a VCR even. (Cheap capture card).

[OldTownChief]

Originally Posted by DaFace

I got a 152 on a retake. I'm pretty sure that these are correct:

Three of mine were different than yours but after looking at them again, yours are right.

[Skip Towne]

Originally Posted by Donger

An average with a range, eh?

That's interesting.

Yep. At least it was when I went to school 80 years ago. 90 is low average and 110 is high average. Below 90 goes downhill pretty quickly and above 110 does also on a Bell curve. 130 is a lot better than 120 but 95-105 not much difference.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

Yep. At least it was when I went to school 80 years ago. 90 is low average and 110 is high average. Below 90 goes downhill pretty quickly and above 110 does also on a Bell curve. 130 is a lot better than 120 but 95-105 not much difference.

That's one funky, asymmetrical bell.

[milkman]

I was bored, so I finally clicked on this thread and read through it all.

I have only two things to say.

First, I have never cried over spilled milk, and I guarantee you I've spilled more milk than anyone here.

Second, after reading through this thread, I think my IQ dipped by 20 points.

[Skip Towne]

Originally Posted by Donger

That's one funky, asymmetrical bell.

No, it is symmetrical. I may have said it wrong but the big differences in IQ occur outside the 90-110 range. Something like 90% of all people are in the 90-110 range. It is all subjective but I consider Festus on Gunsmoke as a 90. I hope to find 110's when I'm hiring but I rarely do. I have always considered IQ tests as BS. I really don't see what they accomplish.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

No, it is symmetrical. I may have said it wrong but the big differences in IQ occur outside the 90-110 range. Something like 90% of all people are in the 90-110 range. It is all subjective but I consider Festus on Gunsmoke as a 90. I hope to find 110's when I'm hiring but I rarely do. I have always considered IQ tests as BS. I really don't see what they accomplish.

Do you know what symmetrical means?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

These online tests are nowhere near accurate. Who ever heard of a True-False IQ test? Plus, the average range (on the Stanford Binet) is 90-110. 110 is a good score. How many on here reported a score in that range? So we are all geniouses then? Yeah, right.

While 110 is a decent score, I would expect an on-line IQ test to have a higher average than a clinically administered test for the following reasons:

* People taking the test multiple times

* People who think they will score well are more likely to voluntarily take such a test than someone who doesn't think they will score well.

I also don't find it too surprising that regular members of CP would consistently score higher than average. This place tends to weed out the idiots, on average.