|
![]() |
|
future chiefs fans
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $5888993
|
Hard to understand those frustrated w/Fitzpatrick
|
Posts: 24,003
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#121 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $-1314792
|
Quote:
I'm not shitting on Alex Smith, but a winning record does not a successful QB make. There are tons of QBs out there with fantastic W-L records over specific stretches of their careers who simply weren't ever very good players. |
|
Posts: 93,281
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#122 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: 19th Hole
Casino cash: $10004725
|
|
Posts: 11,680
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#123 |
Mostly Ignored
Join Date: Jul 2013
Casino cash: $8419985
|
|
Posts: 18,097
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#124 |
In Pat We Trust
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Casino cash: $2729148
|
|
Posts: 12,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#125 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: 19th Hole
Casino cash: $10004725
|
|
Posts: 11,680
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#126 |
"You like to drink?"
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
Casino cash: $-170000
|
Gee, it's almost like neither of those guys had the benefit of a top 10 caliber defense for more than one season.
__________________
Chiefs 2016 Opponents: Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT Chiefs 2017 Opponents: Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South |
Posts: 45,209
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#127 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Has Smith been an effective and accurate passer since 2011? Has he won more games than he's lost? Do you think that the 49ers regret trading him? |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: 19th Hole
Casino cash: $10004725
|
49ers fans are always commenting on Kaep news articles that trading him away led to the locker room instability and their eventual downfall. It was his replacing with kaepernick that broke all trust with the coach and management.
|
Posts: 11,680
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 | |||
"You like to drink?"
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
Casino cash: $-170000
|
Trent Dilfer is constantly trotted out as the example that you don't need a good QB to win a SB (though he'll take a backseat to the 2015 husk of Manning that just earned a ring) because of great defensive play. Well.. what happens when a guy like Dilfer doesn't have the benefit of a great defense?
Same goes for Tebow, though that's an obvious strawman considering he isn't really a QB, so I'll give you that one. Quote:
Quote:
But by stark defensive statistics that you can choose to look up on PFR, as for FO's DVOA efficiency measures, Smith has had the benefit of playing in tandem with the 3rd, 3rd, 9th, 19th, and 6th best defenses from 2011 to 2015 respectively. I'm going to credit these performances as to why the 49ers and Chiefs have won 8+ games in those seasons because I've been told that San Francisco had terrible offensive lines and skill position play outside of running backs and the Chiefs have been mediocre at best along the offensive line and at receiver. Quote:
__________________
Chiefs 2016 Opponents: Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT Chiefs 2017 Opponents: Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South |
|||
Posts: 45,209
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 |
future chiefs fans
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $5888993
|
|
Posts: 24,003
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
future chiefs fans
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $5888993
|
You don't live in the bay area you have no idea what you are talking about most players were cool with kap taking over for Alex.
|
Posts: 24,003
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 |
Immanentize The Eschaton
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Partibus Infidelium
Casino cash: $-844120
|
I live a few hours North of Sac. The vast majority of people up here are either 9er or Raider fans. The 9er fans were really happy when Kap took over. They thought he was the next big thing, a playmaker that would put them over the hump with a strong D and running game. Their thinking was that Harbaugh had built a very strong conventional team and he was sort of the Wild Card that could play off of that. Now that the team is playing like shit they'd rather have someone like Smith to get back to basic fundamental football. But that is 20/20 hindsight and they were mostly in favor of the switch at the time. I think if they still had the team/coaches that Harbaugh gave them they'd still want Kap.
|
Posts: 56,787
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 | |
future chiefs fans
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $5888993
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 24,003
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: 19th Hole
Casino cash: $10004725
|
Quote:
![]() You have the worst takes on football. Did Clay pay you to allow him to post on this account? |
|
Posts: 11,680
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|