Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread - Page 75

**Saulbadguy** · 09-12-2011, 07:57 AM

The old one has AIDS.

Anyways, Chip Brown from Orangebloods.com reports OU may apply to the Pac-12 by the end of the month.

Oklahoma will apply for membership to the Pac-12 before the end of the month, and Oklahoma State is expected to follow suit, a source close to OU's administration told Orangebloods.com.

Even though Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Friday the Pac-12 was not interested in expansion at this time, OU's board of regents is fed up with the instability in the Big 12, the source said.

The OU board of regents will meet within two weeks to formalize plans to apply for membership to the Pac-12, the source said.

Messages left Sunday night with OU athletic director Joe Castiglione and Oklahoma State athletic director Mike Holder were not immediately returned.

If OU follows through with what appears to be a unanimous sentiment on the seven-member Oklahoma board of regents to leave the Big 12, realignment in college athletics could be heating back up. OU's application would be matched by an application from Oklahoma State, the source said, even though OSU president Burns Hargis and mega-booster Boone Pickens both voiced their support for the Big 12 last Thursday.

There is differing sentiment about if the Pac-12 presidents and chancellors are ready to expand again after bringing in Colorado and Utah last year and landing $3 billion TV contracts from Fox and ESPN. Colorado president Bruce Benson told reporters last week CU would be opposed to any expansion that might bring about east and west divisions in the Pac-12.

Currently, there are north and south divisions in the Pac-12. If OU and OSU were to join, Larry Scott would have to get creative.

Scott's orginal plan last summer was to bring in Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State and put them in an eastern division with Arizona and Arizona State. The old Pac-8 schools (USC, UCLA, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) were to be in the west division.

Colorado made the move in June 2010, but when Texas A&M was not on board to go west, the Big 12 came back together with the help of its television partners (ABC/ESPN and Fox).

If Oklahoma and Oklahoma State were accepted into the Pac-12, there would undoubtedly be a hope by Larry Scott that Texas would join the league. But Texas sources have indicated UT is determined to hang onto the Longhorn Network, which would not be permissible in the Pac-12 in its current form.

Texas sources continue to indicate to Orangebloods.com that if the Big 12 falls apart, the Longhorns would consider "all options."

Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe held an emergency conference call 10 days ago with league presidents excluding Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M and asked the other league presidents to "work on Texas" because Beebe didn't think the Pac-12 would take Oklahoma without Texas.

Now, it appears OU is willing to take its chances with the Pac-12 with or without Texas.

There seemed to be a temporary pause in any possible shifting of the college athletics' landscape when Baylor led a charge to tie up Texas A&M's move to the Southeastern Conference in legal red tape. BU refused to waive its right to sue the SEC over A&M's departure from the Big 12, and the SEC said it would not admit Texas A&M until it had been cleared of any potential lawsuits.

Baylor, Kansas and Iowa State have indicated they will not waive their right to sue the SEC.

It's unclear if an application by OU to the Pac-12 would draw the same threats of litigation against the Pac-12 from those Big 12 schools.

Stay tuned.

beer bacon · 09-23-2011, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious

Why would Mizzou want to leave a conference where they have to play OU once a year for a conference where they have to play OU 4-5 times a year?

Why did East Berlin need to build a wall to keep their residents from fleeing to West Berlin?

Bambi · 09-23-2011, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Jesus you're a reerun.

Syracuse made more money in football than basketball. I'll share the links with you if you can figure out that the link you posted says nothing about football.(Hint the chart posted in your link, shows revenue/profit/margin for all basketball teams).

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Here is the latest numbers - Syracuse football made 19 million while men's hoops made 18.
http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/InstDeta...343a303020504d

find Syracuse fellas

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/06/30/fo...tead-of-trees/

Frazod · 09-23-2011, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants

He might not be cut out for internet arguments, but he is one of the smartest posters on the Planet.

Really? I've basically noticed him do two things over the years - start Royals game threads and announce that he's putting on ignore anyone who calls him for being a sniping bitch.

Bambi · 09-23-2011, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Syracuse football has higher revenue than Syracuse basketball. Fact.

Do you lie on purpose or are you just stupid?

oh you too

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/06/30/fo...tead-of-trees/

ChiefsCountry · 09-23-2011, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

find Syracuse fellas

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/06/30/fo...tead-of-trees/

Check my link you dumb****, its the latest numbers. So go **** yourself with an AIDS filled dildo.

Bambi · 09-23-2011, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

What changes do you think Mizzou and others will demand of UT and the Big 12 as a whole?

Sharing of first and second tier TV rights is not enough if LHN remains intact and is not modified.

What else is there?

Missouri is completely within their rights to start their own network.

Bambi · 09-23-2011, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Check my link you dumb****, its the latest numbers. So go **** yourself with an AIDS filled dildo.

I clicked your link.

It didn't work

ChiefsCountry · 09-23-2011, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

I clicked your link.

It didn't work

http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx

Put in Syracuse, it will tell you the exact numbers.

**DaKCMan AP** · 09-23-2011, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Check my link you dumb****, its the latest numbers. So go **** yourself with an AIDS filled dildo.

He's too stupid to know the difference between revenue and net revenue.

Bambi · 09-23-2011, 08:45 AM

Football Revenue

**DaKCMan AP** · 09-23-2011, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

He's too stupid to know the difference between revenue and net revenue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

Football Revenue

Thanks for proving my point.

eazyb81 · 09-23-2011, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious

Why would Mizzou want to leave a conference where they have to play OU once a year for a conference where they have to play OU 4-5 times a year?

Yes, because this is all just about what conference we can likely win the most football games in.

Glad we have you here to delve deep into complex topics like this.

Brock · 09-23-2011, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx

Put in Syracuse, it will tell you the exact numbers.

It doesn't work.

eazyb81 · 09-23-2011, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Thanks for proving my point.

ChiefsCountry · 09-23-2011, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

He's too stupid to know the difference between revenue and net revenue.

Hell KU football actually brings in more revenue than KU basketball.

09-12-2011, 07:57 AM
Saulbadguy When a nightmare becomes real Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $736966	New Conference re-alignment thread The old one has AIDS. Anyways, Chip Brown from Orangebloods.com reports OU may apply to the Pac-12 by the end of the month. Oklahoma will apply for membership to the Pac-12 before the end of the month, and Oklahoma State is expected to follow suit, a source close to OU's administration told Orangebloods.com. Even though Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Friday the Pac-12 was not interested in expansion at this time, OU's board of regents is fed up with the instability in the Big 12, the source said. The OU board of regents will meet within two weeks to formalize plans to apply for membership to the Pac-12, the source said. Messages left Sunday night with OU athletic director Joe Castiglione and Oklahoma State athletic director Mike Holder were not immediately returned. If OU follows through with what appears to be a unanimous sentiment on the seven-member Oklahoma board of regents to leave the Big 12, realignment in college athletics could be heating back up. OU's application would be matched by an application from Oklahoma State, the source said, even though OSU president Burns Hargis and mega-booster Boone Pickens both voiced their support for the Big 12 last Thursday. There is differing sentiment about if the Pac-12 presidents and chancellors are ready to expand again after bringing in Colorado and Utah last year and landing $3 billion TV contracts from Fox and ESPN. Colorado president Bruce Benson told reporters last week CU would be opposed to any expansion that might bring about east and west divisions in the Pac-12. Currently, there are north and south divisions in the Pac-12. If OU and OSU were to join, Larry Scott would have to get creative. Scott's orginal plan last summer was to bring in Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State and put them in an eastern division with Arizona and Arizona State. The old Pac-8 schools (USC, UCLA, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) were to be in the west division. Colorado made the move in June 2010, but when Texas A&M was not on board to go west, the Big 12 came back together with the help of its television partners (ABC/ESPN and Fox). If Oklahoma and Oklahoma State were accepted into the Pac-12, there would undoubtedly be a hope by Larry Scott that Texas would join the league. But Texas sources have indicated UT is determined to hang onto the Longhorn Network, which would not be permissible in the Pac-12 in its current form. Texas sources continue to indicate to Orangebloods.com that if the Big 12 falls apart, the Longhorns would consider "all options." Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe held an emergency conference call 10 days ago with league presidents excluding Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M and asked the other league presidents to "work on Texas" because Beebe didn't think the Pac-12 would take Oklahoma without Texas. Now, it appears OU is willing to take its chances with the Pac-12 with or without Texas. There seemed to be a temporary pause in any possible shifting of the college athletics' landscape when Baylor led a charge to tie up Texas A&M's move to the Southeastern Conference in legal red tape. BU refused to waive its right to sue the SEC over A&M's departure from the Big 12, and the SEC said it would not admit Texas A&M until it had been cleared of any potential lawsuits. Baylor, Kansas and Iowa State have indicated they will not waive their right to sue the SEC. It's unclear if an application by OU to the Pac-12 would draw the same threats of litigation against the Pac-12 from those Big 12 schools. Stay tuned.
Posts: 47,020

09-23-2011, 08:45 AM	#1120
Bambi Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York City Casino cash: $10036993	Football Revenue
Posts: 17,810