Chiefs Should the Chiefs have traded up to snag Matt Ryan? - Page 5

Deberg_1990 · 09-10-2008, 10:36 AM

Lets have some fun!

Of course that would have meant giving up Dorsey, but at least we would have our QBoTF now.

Thoughts......

Mecca · 09-21-2008, 08:17 PM

Ryan is the most polished QB to come out in years, you can tell he'll make it. He's confident he stands tall in the pocket he looks off receivers and doesn't lock on.

Ebolapox · 09-21-2008, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Maclin in the first.
Daniel in the second.
Hood in the third.

This would totally rule.

I'm a mizzou fan. and that would kinda suck. I KNOW you're kidding. but, let's see--10-15 picks too early for maclin, a few rounds too early for daniel, MAYBE good value for hood--I've seen him as a possible second round pick if our defense shores up.

redbrian · 09-21-2008, 08:43 PM

Only if you wanted to see a young kid get his head caved in......how to ruin a good qb prospect, let him play behind a young O-line....

PastorMikH · 09-21-2008, 09:30 PM

I really don't think trading up for Ryan would have done much for us. It would still be the same coaching staff putting the same leash on him. The same playcalling asking him to hand off up the middle twice then drop back on 3rd and 12 with no protection and try to make a play. The same threat of being yanked for half the season for throwing his first INT. He would have the same WRs with balls bouncing off their hands. The same O line NOT blocking for him.

Where he's at, they let him try to make plays and don't behead him for mistakes. Thigpen would probably look better there than here.

Mecca · 09-21-2008, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbrian

Only if you wanted to see a young kid get his head caved in......how to ruin a good qb prospect, let him play behind a young O-line....

Yea because Atlanta has an all world line right.

Sure-Oz · 09-21-2008, 09:32 PM

Dorsey owns

TrickyNicky · 09-21-2008, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Yea because Atlanta has an all world line right.

A good running game like they had against us would do wonders. It's a vicious cycle we are in. We can't pass because we can't run. We can't run because they know we won't pass on first down until we are down two scores.

PastorMikH · 09-21-2008, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Yea because Atlanta has an all world line right.

They look like that when they are playing our DL

Mecca · 09-21-2008, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky

A good running game like they had against us would do wonders. It's a vicious cycle we are in. We can't pass because we can't run. We can't run because they know we won't pass on first down until we are down two scores.

It's mostly because our team is reeruned, it's not like Atlanta is a superior talented team.

**DeezNutz** · 09-21-2008, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1

I'm a mizzou fan. and that would kinda suck. I KNOW you're kidding. but, let's see--10-15 picks too early for maclin, a few rounds too early for daniel, MAYBE good value for hood--I've seen him as a possible second round pick if our defense shores up.

Yeah, not serious. There's some talent in Columbia, no doubt, but at this point, Mizzou's kicker is a player I'd really like to snag in a late round, if possible.

PastorMikH · 09-21-2008, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Maclin in the first.
Daniel in the second.
Hood in the third.

This would totally rule.

I don't think Daniel could play for Herm. Daniel is too competitive and likes to win too much to ever settle for what Herm wants to put on the field.

blueballs · 09-21-2008, 09:49 PM

this thread is about as useful as
Damion McIntosh at tackle
the object of interest has already past it by

Ebolapox · 09-21-2008, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Yeah, not serious. There's some talent in Columbia, no doubt, but at this point, Mizzou's kicker is a player I'd really like to snag in a late round, if possible.

no doubt. some sick talent in columbia these days.

hell, I wouldn't be unhappy with daniel in the fifth or sixth round.

**DeezNutz** · 09-21-2008, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1

no doubt. some sick talent in columbia these days.

hell, I wouldn't be unhappy with daniel in the fifth or sixth round.

It sucks for him that he's been such a great player up to this point, and someone's going to take a tape measure to him at the combine and cross him off the list.

You're probably right--he'll go in the 5th/6th range, but it wouldn't be completely shocking for him not to get taken at all. Didn't Baltimore grab Troy Smith in the 4th? Another short guy...

**DeezNutz** · 09-21-2008, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH

I don't think Daniel could play for Herm. Daniel is too competitive and likes to win too much to ever settle for what Herm wants to put on the field.

You're saying that he actually "plays to win the game"?

09-10-2008, 10:36 AM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $364454	Should the Chiefs have traded up to snag Matt Ryan? Lets have some fun! Of course that would have meant giving up Dorsey, but at least we would have our QBoTF now. Thoughts......
Posts: 68,381

09-21-2008, 08:17 PM	#61
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-462950	Ryan is the most polished QB to come out in years, you can tell he'll make it. He's confident he stands tall in the pocket he looks off receivers and doesn't lock on.
Posts: 115,226

09-21-2008, 08:43 PM	#63
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	Only if you wanted to see a young kid get his head caved in......how to ruin a good qb prospect, let him play behind a young O-line....
Posts: 3,899

09-21-2008, 09:30 PM	#64
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9905087	I really don't think trading up for Ryan would have done much for us. It would still be the same coaching staff putting the same leash on him. The same playcalling asking him to hand off up the middle twice then drop back on 3rd and 12 with no protection and try to make a play. The same threat of being yanked for half the season for throwing his first INT. He would have the same WRs with balls bouncing off their hands. The same O line NOT blocking for him. Where he's at, they let him try to make plays and don't behead him for mistakes. Thigpen would probably look better there than here. __________________
Posts: 20,454

09-21-2008, 09:49 PM	#72
blueballs Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	this thread is about as useful as Damion McIntosh at tackle the object of interest has already past it by
Posts: 14,233