*** Official New York Yankees @ Kansas City Royals Game Thread (5/15) ***

[alnorth]

Final	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	R	H	E
NYY (21-16)	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	5	1
KC (23-13)	1	0	1	0	0	6	4	0	X	12	17	0

Mike Moustakas was just short of hitting for the cycle (single, 2 doubles, triple)



Loss, (5-1) Michael Pineda 5⅓IP 5R 5ER 0BB 1K
David Carpenter 0IP 1R 1ER 0BB 0K
Justin Wilson ⅓IP 2R 2ER 1BB 0K
Jose Ramirez 1IP 4R 4ER 2BB 0K
Branden Pinder 1⅓IP 0R 0ER 0BB 1K

VS.



Win, (3-0) Chris Young 5⅔IP 1R 1ER 2BB 2K
Hold, (1) Franklin Morales 2⅓IP 0R 0ER 0BB 0K
Aaron Brooks 1IP 0R 0ER 0BB 1K

Home Runs

none

AL Central

Final: CLE 8, TEX 3
Final: TB 2, MIN 3
Final: DET 10, STL 4
Final: CWS 7, OAK 6

Strarting Lineups

NYY

1. Jacoby Ellsbury, CF
2. Brett Gardner, LF
2. Chris Young, ph/LF
3. Alex Rodriguez, DH
4. Mark Teixeira, 1B
4. Ryan Murphy, ph/C
5. Brian McCann, C
5. Garrett Jones, ph/1B
6. Carlos Beltran, RF
7. Chase Headley, 3B
8. Stephen Drew, 2B
9. Didi Gregorius, SS

KC

1. Alcides Escobar, SS
2. Mike Moustakas, 3B
3. Lorenzo Cain, CF
4. Eric Hosmer, 1B
5. Kendrys Morales, DH
6. Alex Gordon, LF
6. Jarrod Dyson, LF
7. Salvador Perez, C
7. Drew Butera, ph/C
8. Omar Infante, 2B
9. Paulo Orlando, RF

[SPATCH]

Originally Posted by petegz28

The only thing that is dumb is you and your continued display of ignorance on something you clearly have no ****ing clue of which you speak. Do you even know what technical analysis is? Don't answer, that was rhetorical. You clearly have no ****ing idea, whatsoever.

I offered to explain the concepts and theories to you and instead you chose to continue to spew your jizz flavored breath all over your screen instead of taking the opportunity to learn something.

So have an antifreeze cocktail on me and go **** yourself.

You really trying to act like you need a background in financial market forecasting to interpret that stupid ****ing graph?

Tell me, why didn't breaking past +8 result in a "strong winning streak"?

[big nasty kcnut]

I'd kill to hear the royals on the radio here in tulsa!

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by SPATCH

You really trying to act like you need a background in financial market forecasting to interpret that stupid ****ing graph?
Tell me, why didn't breaking past +8 result in a "strong winning streak"?

Considering the ignorance you keep pasting on the screen, I think the answer is obvious. If you had half a ****ing clue of what that "stupid ****ing chart" was actually showing, you would see the answer right in front of your face.

Also considering when I posted the chart I said "that's the stock market\technical analysis take.."

So do yourself a favor, use some Google. Or, you can dump your ****ed up attitude and I would be happy to explain it to you.

Edit: On second thought....your AIDS are a little too airborne for me....

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Here is a chart I put together of our net wins. You can see why I said this was a breakout game. We broke through the +9 level which had been acting as resistance. Additionally our support level moved up to +8 games over .500. Meaning in the near future we shouldn't break down below +8 and if we do then we are most likely heading for a losing streak.

But the momentum is obviously to the up side. Since +9 had been tested 3 times and now we finally broke through it, it should signal a stronger winning streak. At least that is the stock market\technical analysis take on the matter.

This will likely be the dumbest thing I'll see in a game thread this whole season. Really, it's like you tried to come up with something completely ridiculous.

[cosmo20002]

It is truly sad that pete's insane chart is buried at the end of game thread that very few people will likely see.

It really deserves the full-throated mockery of a broad CP audience.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

It is truly sad that pete's insane chart is buried at the end of game thread that very few people will likely see.

It really deserves the full-throated mockery of a broad CP audience.

Don't you have an Obama doll to inflate???

I gotta hear this...why does Cosmobama think this is insane??

Or is it you just saw someone disagreeing with me and being your usual, bundle of sticks stain self, you felt you needed to pile on?

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Here is a chart I put together of our net wins. You can see why I said this was a breakout game. We broke through the +9 level which had been acting as resistance. Additionally our support level moved up to +8 games over .500. Meaning in the near future we shouldn't break down below +8 and if we do then we are most likely heading for a losing streak.

But the momentum is obviously to the up side. Since +9 had been tested 3 times and now we finally broke through it, it should signal a stronger winning streak. At least that is the stock market\technical analysis take on the matter.

The win streak is at 2. A "stronger" won streak would be 3.

The Royals have the best record in the AL. They are playing at home.
Just knowing that and predicting they will "probably" win tomorrow is a more meaningful analysis than "we'll probably win since +9 had been tested 3 times before and we finally broke through it."

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Don't you have an Obama doll to inflate???

I gotta hear this...why does Cosmobama think this is insane??

Or is it you just saw someone disagreeing with me and being your usual, pillowbiter stain self, you felt you needed to pile on?

The dumb and desperate Obama references indicate that you realize just how stupid your "analysis" is.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

The win streak is at 2. A "stronger" won streak would be 3.

The Royals have the best record in the AL. They are playing at home.
Just knowing that and predicting they will "probably" win tomorrow is a more meaningful analysis than "we'll probably win since +9 had been tested 3 times before and we finally broke through it."

They're playing at home, against the Yankees with Duffy on the mound. We have a good chance of retesting the +9 before continuing our winning ways.

Other than that you really haven't said why the chart was insane. Only that there are other methods of analysis one can apply which I never claimed otherwise.


So just admit you saw me arguing with someone and being your douche self you couldn't help but pile on.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

The dumb and desperate Obama references indicate that you realize just how stupid your "analysis" is.

Kinda like your, pile on and slam all things Pete regardless???

Nah, it's just my way of showing you what a dick bag, **** head, I do and always have thought you to be.

[cosmo20002]

pete, start a thread with your "analysis" where people might see it.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

pete, start a thread with your "analysis" where people might see it.

don't you worry your little sandy, vag...I'll bring it into the game thread tomorrow, sweet heart

[cosmo20002]

Ignore pitching matchups, the opponent, the site, etc., when making a prediction.

Focus on how many times a certain win level above .500 has been reached.

And you're not just predicting the next game, you're predicting the next several--based on that a certain win level above .500 has been reached a certain number of times.

It's completely moronic.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

Ignore pitching matchups, the opponent, the site, etc., when making a prediction.

Focus on how many times a certain win level above .500 has been reached.

And you're not just predicting the next game, you're predicting the next several--based on that a certain win level above .500 has been reached a certain number of times.

It's completely moronic.

Why is it moronic? This is the second time I've asked you. Stop being your little passive-aggressive, bitch self.

[petegz28]

So tell me Cosmo if a team fluctuates between +8 and +9 wins then finally breaks out to +10, what would that indicate about the team?

And didn't you just ignore the pitching matchups and base a prediction on us playing at home and on a 2 game win streak???