Chiefs CBS sports online website article: Patrick Peterson to Chiefs "MAKES SENSE" - Page 4

carcosa · 05-09-2019, 10:23 AM

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/n...s-blockbuster/

3.Cardinals trade Patrick Peterson to the Chiefs
Chiefs get: Patrick Peterson
Cardinals get: 2020 first-round pick

Patrick Peterson won't come out and say it, but it kind of seems like he doesn't want to play for the Cardinals anymore. Just to give you a little refresher on the Peterson situation: The Cardinals corner demanded a trade back in October, only to apologize for making that demand a few months later, but the situation didn't end there, because now, it looks like he wants to be traded again. Peterson has removed the Cardinals name from all of his social media accounts and he's spent the past month taking passive-aggressive shots at the team. If you've ever watched literally any reality show involving a Millennial, those are usually the first two signs that a breakup is coming.

Peterson even posted a photo of some of his former teammates who are no longer with him in Arizona, and that photo had an interesting caption, "My boys told me to watch out for the snakes in the long grass!"

With a new Cardinals coaching staff now in place, it would make since for them to start fresh with players who actually want to be in Arizona. Clearly, Peterson isn't one of those players.

If the Cards start to shop Peterson, every team in the NFL should call them with an offer. Not only is he a three-time All-Pro corner, but he's also under contract for the next two seasons at the very reasonable rates of $11 million (2019) and $12.05 million (2020).

Although Peterson could get dealt anywhere, we're sending him to the Chiefs and that's because Kansas City has been doing everything possible to beef up a defensive unit that couldn't stop anyone while ranking 31st overall in the NFL last season. After watching his defense choke away the AFC title game, Andy Reid is clearly trying to make sure that doesn't happen again.

Not only have the Chiefs already traded for Frank Clark and Emmanuel Ogbah, but they've also signed Tyrann Mathieu, Alex Okafor and Damien Wilson. If the Chiefs were to add Peterson to the mix, the defense would be nearly as scary as their offense. Also, based on Peterson's Instagram picture, it seems Peterson would probably be pretty excited about the chance to reunite with Mathieu.

#PRAY4PP!!!!!

CaliforniaChief · 05-09-2019, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

1st rounder that probably ends up being 29-32? Ehh, I don’t think I’d mind.

A lockdown corner like PP immediately makes this defense top 10, maybe top 5.

Absolutely this. I personally don't think AZ is going to trade him, not after all the good attention they garnered from their draft, but if they do...Veach should, and probably would, move in.

Mecca · 05-09-2019, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs

Let's just trade our first round pick every ****ing year. Who needs young cost controlled talent anyways?

Yea...when its basically a 2 it doesn't hold a ton of value though...and this is a bowl team.

TLO · 05-09-2019, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs

Let's just trade our first round pick every ****ing year. Who needs young cost controlled talent anyways?

Ryan Sims says "HELL YEAH!!"

pugsnotdrugs19 · 05-09-2019, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs

Let's just trade our first round pick every ****ing year. Who needs young cost controlled talent anyways?

If they had PP and Hill still around, they’d be almost inarguably the most talented team in the league. That’s gotta count for something.

The draft pick has value yeah but this would be a unique opportunity to acquire one of the best corners in football, an extremely valuable position. He’s also a great leader.

**New World Order** · 05-09-2019, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoes

Can't we give them a 2nd and a 4th or some shit?

2nd and 4th is more than reasonable for a good corner who’s approaching 30, playing on a team that’s rebuilding

carcosa · 05-09-2019, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs

Let's just trade our first round pick every ****ing year. Who needs young cost controlled talent anyways?

Shut da **** up

Naptown Chief · 05-09-2019, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs

Let's just trade our first round pick every ****ing year. Who needs young cost controlled talent anyways?

Let's just trade you to another forum.

pugsnotdrugs19 · 05-09-2019, 11:50 AM

You gotta think about the impact of a player like this. He makes everyone else’s job easier on defense. You can do different things schematically, whether it be letting him shut down the opposing #2 WR or having him cover the #1 with less safety help than most corners would need.

Chief Pagan · 05-09-2019, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Yea...when its basically a 2 it doesn't hold a ton of value though...and this is a bowl team.

A first round that is basically a 2 still gets a fifth year option, right?

Mecca · 05-09-2019, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Pagan

A first round that is basically a 2 still gets a fifth year option, right?

If dude is a scrub does that matter?

Would you rather have Frank Clark or that DE the Seahawks picked?

**New World Order** · 05-09-2019, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Pagan

A first round that is basically a 2 still gets a fifth year option, right?

We can worry about cost effective options after we win back-to-back sbs

**jjchieffan** · 05-09-2019, 11:58 AM

So, since I have dumbass Carcosa blocked I can't read what was in the OP. I went to CBSSports.com and found an article called 7 trades that make sense. I assume that's the right article? If it is, then I found some interesting things in there. Mainly that he had 2 years left on his contract at $11 and $12 million. Now, I'm guessing that he would want a new contract as part of the trade. Should the Chiefs give him a new contract right away if they make the trade? I mean, nothing has been said about why he wants out of Arizona. But I'm guessing money because of his snakes in the grass comment. That makes me think that he was promised a rework on his deal and the Cards changed their minds. I don't know. Is there anything out there to support that idea?

Stryker · 05-09-2019, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051

My dick is hard and ready to blow!!! Come on PP!!! Finish me like Mortal Kombat!!!

pugsnotdrugs19 · 05-09-2019, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

So, since I have dumbass Carcosa blocked I can't read what was in the OP. I went to CBSSports.com and found an article called 7 trades that make sense. I assume that's the right article? If it is, then I found some interesting things in there. Mainly that he had 2 years left on his contract at $11 and $12 million. Now, I'm guessing that he would want a new contract as part of the trade. Should the Chiefs give him a new contract right away if they make the trade? I mean, nothing has been said about why he wants out of Arizona. But I'm guessing money because of his snakes in the grass comment. That makes me think that he was promised a rework on his deal and the Cards changed their minds. I don't know. Is there anything out there to support that idea?

That’s where things get tricky. I don’t really love the idea of a big extension.

Sell him on winning a Super Bowl, and if it doesn’t work, so be it.

RunKC · 05-09-2019, 12:09 PM

Why do people respond to okchiefs? Dude just bitches to bitch. That’s every single post he makes.

He’s been bitching about this team not trying to get a good corner for several months and now that a report comes out about doing that, he still bitches.

05-09-2019, 10:23 AM
carcosa Thank you Join Date: May 2014 Casino cash: $523695	CBS sports online website article: Patrick Peterson to Chiefs "MAKES SENSE" https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/n...s-blockbuster/ 3.Cardinals trade Patrick Peterson to the Chiefs Chiefs get: Patrick Peterson Cardinals get: 2020 first-round pick Patrick Peterson won't come out and say it, but it kind of seems like he doesn't want to play for the Cardinals anymore. Just to give you a little refresher on the Peterson situation: The Cardinals corner demanded a trade back in October, only to apologize for making that demand a few months later, but the situation didn't end there, because now, it looks like he wants to be traded again. Peterson has removed the Cardinals name from all of his social media accounts and he's spent the past month taking passive-aggressive shots at the team. If you've ever watched literally any reality show involving a Millennial, those are usually the first two signs that a breakup is coming. Peterson even posted a photo of some of his former teammates who are no longer with him in Arizona, and that photo had an interesting caption, "My boys told me to watch out for the snakes in the long grass!" With a new Cardinals coaching staff now in place, it would make since for them to start fresh with players who actually want to be in Arizona. Clearly, Peterson isn't one of those players. If the Cards start to shop Peterson, every team in the NFL should call them with an offer. Not only is he a three-time All-Pro corner, but he's also under contract for the next two seasons at the very reasonable rates of $11 million (2019) and $12.05 million (2020). Although Peterson could get dealt anywhere, we're sending him to the Chiefs and that's because Kansas City has been doing everything possible to beef up a defensive unit that couldn't stop anyone while ranking 31st overall in the NFL last season. After watching his defense choke away the AFC title game, Andy Reid is clearly trying to make sure that doesn't happen again. Not only have the Chiefs already traded for Frank Clark and Emmanuel Ogbah, but they've also signed Tyrann Mathieu, Alex Okafor and Damien Wilson. If the Chiefs were to add Peterson to the mix, the defense would be nearly as scary as their offense. Also, based on Peterson's Instagram picture, it seems Peterson would probably be pretty excited about the chance to reunite with Mathieu. #PRAY4PP!!!!!
Posts: 23,253

05-09-2019, 11:50 AM	#53
pugsnotdrugs19 SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $7839447	You gotta think about the impact of a player like this. He makes everyone else’s job easier on defense. You can do different things schematically, whether it be letting him shut down the opposing #2 WR or having him cover the #1 with less safety help than most corners would need.
Posts: 27,787	2 0

05-09-2019, 11:58 AM	#57
jjchieffan Supporter Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Highlandville, MO Casino cash: $1302248	So, since I have dumbass Carcosa blocked I can't read what was in the OP. I went to CBSSports.com and found an article called 7 trades that make sense. I assume that's the right article? If it is, then I found some interesting things in there. Mainly that he had 2 years left on his contract at $11 and $12 million. Now, I'm guessing that he would want a new contract as part of the trade. Should the Chiefs give him a new contract right away if they make the trade? I mean, nothing has been said about why he wants out of Arizona. But I'm guessing money because of his snakes in the grass comment. That makes me think that he was promised a rework on his deal and the Cards changed their minds. I don't know. Is there anything out there to support that idea?
Posts: 13,039	1 3

05-09-2019, 12:09 PM	#60
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $-130389	Why do people respond to okchiefs? Dude just bitches to bitch. That’s every single post he makes. He’s been bitching about this team not trying to get a good corner for several months and now that a report comes out about doing that, he still bitches. __________________ Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley
Posts: 49,659