Broncos news megathread

[ROYC75]

Discussion: All things Broncos.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

The Bengals are the ones who ran out of time, not the Chiefs.

.

Because they got their 2 minute drive stalled by a huge Chiefs sack.



And in doing so, left the Chiefs with little to no time to score. Bad, bad logic you have here.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Because they got their 2 minute drive stalled by a huge Chiefs sack.



And in doing so, left the Chiefs with little to no time to score. Bad, bad logic you have here.

Not really. You’re the one trying to argue that the Chiefs getting 5 downs was bad for the Chiefs.

[tooge]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Not really. The ref tried to stop the play, but wasn’t successful. It’s happened before, and the refs have allowed the gains made by the offense in such situations to count. If KC had gained a first down, the refs may well have allowed it to stand.

In a very real way, the Chiefs got five downs on that series.

Also, what sack are you referring to? The one that the refs erased with a defensive holding call?

Yes, that one. That quick series cost the clock time that the CHiefs would have had at the end. Look, you can't stand it and I get it. Your team blows and has zero chance at jack shit for a long time. Keep bitching

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

The Bengals are the ones who ran out of time, not the Chiefs.

Even so, biased calls do not necessarily need to directly affect the outcome of the game to show that the refs are biased.

Remember the flag that came out about three seconds after a KC interception? Remember the TD that was wiped off the board due to a hold that could be called on nearly every play? Remember the hold that killed KC's second to last possession? The unsportsmanlike?

Gee, it would seem these are calls that probably aren't made if the refs are biased toward the opponent, but I could be wrong...

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Not really. You’re the one trying to argue that the Chiefs getting 5 downs was bad for the Chiefs.

No, that's a strawman, we're simply arguing that it was inconsequential in regards to the outcome of the game dumbass.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Not really. You’re the one trying to argue that the Chiefs getting 5 downs was bad for the Chiefs.

WTF? I'm talking about the about the grounding call. Follow along.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by staylor26

No, that's a strawman, we're simply arguing that it was inconsequential in regards to the outcome of the game dumbass.

Both were inconsequential for the Bengals. It's almost like everyone forgot the chances Burrow had to score and couldn't get it done.

Buch of little bitter bitches.

[RedinTexas]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Not really. You’re the one trying to argue that the Chiefs getting 5 downs was bad for the Chiefs.

You are misinformed in your premise. The Chiefs did not get 5 downs. The play called back never happened. It would have never happened if the Chiefs had scored a TD just as it never happened when the Chiefs failed to gain the 1st down. It wasn't a "do-over," it was a "get things right to start with and then run the actual play."

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by RedinTexas

You are misinformed in your premise. The Chiefs did not get 5 downs. The play called back never happened. It would have never happened if the Chiefs had scored a TD just as it never happened when the Chiefs failed to gain the 1st down. It wasn't a "do-over," it was a "get things right to start with and then run the actual play."

Yeah but he's tired of his team being a joke so he needs to channel that disdain somewhere. So why not make shit up, amirite?

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by RedinTexas

You are misinformed in your premise. The Chiefs did not get 5 downs. The play called back never happened. It would have never happened if the Chiefs had scored a TD just as it never happened when the Chiefs failed to gain the 1st down. It wasn't a "do-over," it was a "get things right to start with and then run the actual play."

Read the thread. Add I wrote before, it has happened in the part where a ref tries but fails to stop a play, and they have allowed the offensive yards gained to stand. If the Chiefs got the 1st, there is a very good chance they let it stand. The Chiefs really did get an extra play, and when they still failed to get the first, the refs gave it to them via penalty.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

If the Chiefs got the 1st, there is a very good chance they let it stand.

See, this is you just making shit up.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

WTF? I'm talking about the about the grounding call. Follow along.

Which grounding call? The one that shouldn’t have been called against the Bengals or the one where Mahomes did the same thing and got no flag?

[RunKC]

The Bengals had every chance to win. They’d didn’t bc their last 2 drives, with the game tied:

-Burrow threw an interception
-Chris Jones got a sack on 3rd down

Then they gave up a 29 yard punt return. THEN they hit Mahomes well out of bounds in which everyone I’ve seen universally agreed it was a penalty.

They had plenty of chances. Then ****ed them up. We didn’t.

End of story. You lose! Good day!

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Which grounding call? The one that shouldn’t have been called against the Bengals or the one where Mahomes did the same thing and got no flag?

Lol, enjoy your misery. Keep making shit up and lying to yourself. We're going to the SB.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by RunKC

The Bengals has every chance to win. They’d didn’t bc their last 2 drives, with the game tied:

-Burrow threw an interception
-Chris Jones got a sack on 3rd down

Then they gave up a 29 yard punt return. THEN they hit Mahomes well out of bounds in which everyone I’ve seen universally agreed it was a penalty.

They had plenty of chances. Then ****ed them up. We didn’t.

End of story. You lose! Good day!

Most people would call that an implosion.

Or, uh, ahem A CHOKE JOB.