Deshaun Watson is sued for sexual assault and battery (New allegations as of 9/9/24)

[TLO]

As Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson struggles to regain his old form, he has a new legal issue.

On Monday, Watson was sued in Houston for sexual assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The accusations are strikingly similar to those made against Watson in more than 20 lawsuits filed in 2021. However, the plaintiff in the new case, who filed under the Jane Doe pseudonym, contends that she went on a date with Watson. Most if not all other cases arose from paid massages that Watson had arranged.

The lawsuit explains that the date was set for October 10, 2020. Watson, per the lawsuit, was initially unable to find her apartment. He called her and allegedly began “aggressively yelling and screaming and stating that he could not find her apartment and that he ‘doesn’t have time for this.’”

The lawsuit then contains the following allegations:

“When Watson finally arrived at Doe’s apartment, Doe had not finished putting on makeup, so she invited Watson in to have a seat in her living room while she finished getting ready. As she was putting on makeup in her bathroom, Doe left the bathroom door open and attempted a conversation with Watson, trying to ease the tension from his angry outburst. Jane Doe quickly began to believe she was talking to herself because Watson wasn’t responding.

“Jane Doe came out of her bathroom to investigate Watson’s silence and shockingly found him completely naked on her bed, lying face-down on his stomach. While Jane Doe stood there in shock, Watson turned his head and aggressively insisted that she massage him, gesturing to his buttocks. Jane Doe asked if Watson meant he wanted her to massage his back, but Watson indicated that it was his buttocks he wanted massaged.

“Jane Doe was at this point in the encounter terrified. She was in her small apartment with a much larger man, and she was still reeling from Watson’s outburst and aggression on the phone. Doe thus tried to appease Watson by rubbing his back, rather than his buttocks. Watson began insisting, again, that she focus on his glutes. Seemingly frustrated that Doe would only rub his back, Watson then turned over, revealing an erection. Watson continued to demand that Jane Doe massage him, gesturing from his knees to his groin. Jane Doe froze in fear, unsure of how to refuse Watson’s advances without jeopardizing her safety. Confused and scared, she reiterated to Watson that she wasn’t a masseuse. Watson asked her what she wanted to do instead.

“Before Jane Doe could answer, Watson grabbed Jane Doe’s leg and positioned her so that she was lying down. Watson then partially disrobed Jane Doe and penetrated her vagina without consent, implicit or explicit. Jane Doe felt paralyzed, unsure if she should risk her safety by trying to stop Watson or endure his assault. Watson roughly sexually assaulted Jane Doe for several minutes in a ‘missionary position’ before grabbing her and flipping her over. Watson continued to assault Doe aggressively from behind. Jane Doe finally gathered the courage and strength to escape Watson. Jane Doe quickly ran to her dresser to grab a heavy piece of décor for self-defense, and yelled at Watson [to] get out of her apartment. Enraged, Watson stormed out of Jane Doe’s apartment.”

The statute of limitations for most personal injury cases is two years. In Texas, a five-year window applies because the case expressly alleges sexual assault,

The plaintiff is represented by Tony Buzbee. He represented many others who sued Watson in 2021.

This new case raises plenty of issues, from the standpoint of the league and the Browns. It’s possible that Watson could be subject to further scrutiny under the Personal Conduct Policy. It’s also possible that a suspension — if one is imposed — could give the Browns a path toward voiding his remaining salary guarantees and ending the relationship.

The biggest difference between the latest case and the others is that Watson specifically is accused of sexual assault.

[mschiefs1984]

Originally Posted by New World Order

Although not by much, this tops Denver's Wilson deal as the worst trade of all-time.

I don't know Cleveland could end up getting out of that deal if there's anything to this. Denver will be paying Wilson to play against them this year.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by SAGA45

I'm surprised the Bills haven't filed sexual assault charges against Veach.

That is consensual rape.

[suzzer99]

The real question is did she tell multiple people about it at the time. And why wait this long instead of come forward when all the other lawsuits were happening?

[New World Order]

Originally Posted by mschiefs1984

I don't know Cleveland could end up getting out of that deal if there's anything to this. Denver will be paying Wilson to play against them this year.

Well howdy stranger

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by mschiefs1984

I don't know Cleveland could end up getting out of that deal if there's anything to this.

If that's true that's all the motive you need.

The real crime was stealing all that money from Cleveland and sucking baows. There's a bus somewhere with yer' name on it now...

[BlackHelicopters]

Watson needs help.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by BlackHelicopters

Watson needs help a bullet between the eyes.

FYP

[displacedinMN]

Is Cam Newton still active?

[Marcellus]

Man this all seems awfully convenient for Cleveland.

Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson could be in danger of losing his job and the remaining money on his contract after new allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced on Monday, Sept. 9.

Mike Florio of NBC Sports' Pro Football Talk reported that a lawsuit for sexual assault and battery has been filed against Watson in Houston from an incident that allegedly occurred in 2020.

"This new case raises plenty of issues, from the standpoint of the league and the Browns," Florio wrote. "It’s possible that Watson could be subject to further scrutiny under the Personal Conduct Policy. It’s also possible that a suspension — if one is imposed — could give the Browns a path toward voiding his remaining salary guarantees and ending the relationship."

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Man this all seems awfully convenient for Cleveland.

I certainly hope they're stuck with their poor decision. They deserve to pay out every ****ing cent of that awful contract for being dipshits.

And Florio is a cuck who doesn't know shit so I'm not gonna give a shit what he has to say about this

[dirk digler]

It is Florio but here is what he says.

On Monday, a new lawsuit was filed against Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson. For Browns fans who have concluded that Watson isn’t the answer, the question becomes whether the new allegations could allow the Browns to escape the balance of the five-year, fully-guaranteed deal.

The short answer is, “Maybe.”

The longer answer comes from Watson’s contract. PFT has obtained a copy of it. The key provision is paragraph 42.

Here’s the full language of paragraph 42: “Player hereby represents and warrants (except as otherwise disclosed to club in writing), as of the date hereof, that (1) Player has not been charged with, indicted for, convicted of or pled nolo contendre to any felony and/or misdemeanor involving fraud or moral turpitude, (ii) Player has not engaged in conduct which could subject him to a charge, indictment or conviction of any such offense, and (iii) no circumstances exist that would prevent Player’s continuing availability to the Club for duration of this Contract.”

Did Watson disclose this specific potential claim to the Browns in writing before he signed the contract? That’s the key question. If he did, the lawsuit can’t activate paragraph 42. If he didn’t, things get potentially complicated.

Based on the default language connected to the various guarantees, Watson doesn’t necessarily have to be suspended for the payments to be voided. Instead, if he “violates any material term of the Contract {included, but not limited to, Paragraph 42),” Watson has defaulted and the future guarantees can be voided.

But here’s the most important language from Paragraph 42: “no circumstances exist that would prevent Player’s continuing availability to the Club for duration of this Contract.” This language suggests that Watson’s “availability” has been interrupted by the “circumstances” in the lawsuit. In other words, he needs to be suspended for the alleged conduct.

Could he be suspended under the Personal Conduct Policy? The first question in this regard is whether the league even knew about these allegations. As previously mentioned, the NFL has declined comment regarding the new lawsuit against Watson.

As a practical matter, this is about 2025 and 2026. He’s still due to receive $92 million, fully guaranteed, after the current season. If he would be suspended before the 2025 season begins, the Browns could declare a default, void the guarantees, and move on from Watson.

To summarize, did Watson disclose this to the Browns? If yes, the issue is over. If he didn’t, and if the ends up being suspended for it, the Browns could indeed escape the final two years of the five-year deal.

[Marcellus]

I feel like when he signed his deal they stated that he couldn't be punished contractually for any event that occurred prior to him signing that contract.

How could Watson disclose an accusation that hasn't been made yet prior to signing a contract?

Did Watson disclose this specific potential claim to the Browns in writing before he signed the contract? That’s the key question. If he did, the lawsuit can’t activate paragraph 42. If he didn’t, things get potentially complicated.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

I feel like when he signed his deal they stated that he couldn't be punished contractually for any event that occurred prior to him signing that contract.

How could Watson disclose an accusation that hasn't been made yet prior to signing a contract?

I heard that yesterday as well. The Browns were stupid to agree to that and now they are probably ****ed. I don't feel bad for them though.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven

So, this was October 2020, prime Covid season. That's kinda weird, but whatever.

Then, after he basically rapes her and she gets away from him (he's completely naked) she screams at him to leave and he storms out...naked?

As always, there's more to the story. At this point, I wouldn't doubt that he did this, but I also wouldn't discount a woman being a gold digger in this situation. There can be no proof of this 4 years later, so it's her word against his.

IF it's true, it's too bad she waited so long.

This.

[notorious]

Factory of Sadness plows ahead.