Chiefs Are the Bills overhyped? - Page 229

RaidersOftheCellar · 03:31 PM

Update: Yes, the Bills were overhyped.

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo

The city eats dogshit on top of spaghetti. It starts with being a dumpster town with a dumpster owner. Sprinkle in thugs like chase and mixon and you get skyline sadness

Guys who live in crack houses shouldn't throw needles.

Eleazar · 03-14-2023, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo

Joe Durrrrr is another get to one SB and lose then never get back qb

Probably. I wouldn't be surprised if Taylor wanted to go back to Shittsburgh soon

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele

Probably. I wouldn't be surprised if Taylor wanted to go back to Shittsburgh soon

Doubtful. But i heard a rumor that Higgins wants to go back to Anchorage where he played midfielder for the Saskatchewan Oil Hawks.

Coochie liquor · 03-14-2023, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

You can start at the top of this deeeeeoooock and you know where to go from there!!

The whole 1/2 inch to the bottom??

ToxSocks · 03-14-2023, 03:36 PM

Bengals losing that pair of safeties is a bigger deal than people are giving credit for.

It gave them a distinct strategic advantage when dealing with Kelce. It's part of why we struggle to score against them.

With them out of the equation, they've lost a significant part of their formula for dealing with Kelce.

staylor26 · 03-14-2023, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Bengals losing that pair of safeties is a bigger deal than people are giving credit for.

It gave them a distinct strategic advantage when dealing with Kelce. It's part of why we struggle to score against them.

With them out of the equation, they've lost a significant part of their formula for dealing with Kelce.

Yup, just look at how the Bills have looked when they've been without their safeties.

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor

The whole 1/2 inch to the bottom??

If you've already gone 11 1/2, might as well go all the way dawg.

jerryaldini · 03-14-2023, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Bengals losing that pair of safeties is a bigger deal than people are giving credit for.

It gave them a distinct strategic advantage when dealing with Kelce. It's part of why we struggle to score against them.

With them out of the equation, they've lost a significant part of their formula for dealing with Kelce.

Yeah I think they knew Bates was gone but also losing Bell is a big blow. They did resign Pratt at a reasonable value. Wonder if they target Thornhill.

ToxSocks · 03-14-2023, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerryaldini

Yeah I think they knew Bates was gone but also losing Bell is a big blow. They did resign Pratt at a reasonable value. Wonder if they target Thornhill.

Thornhill is probably too expensive for them with some of these contracts they have coming up, and they still have no OL.

I think Thornhill would be a luxury they can't afford. They still have to figure out OL, then they have to pay Burrow and those receivers.

Coochie liquor · 03-14-2023, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

If you've already gone 11 1/2, might as well go all the way dawg.

I said inch not millimeter. Don’t worry baby dick, I won’t tell!

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor

I said inch not millimeter. Don’t worry baby dick, I won’t tell!

That's not me in the mirror, hombre.

Pablo · 03-14-2023, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

That's not me in the mirror, hombre.

Cuz the dude in the mirror is wearing a SB Champs shirt?

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Thornhill is probably too expensive for them with some of these contracts they have coming up, and they still have no OL.

I think Thornhill would be a luxury they can't afford. They still have to figure out OL, then they have to pay Burrow and those receivers.

Cap space isn't an issue. Anyone can work around that. Their MO is to wait out the initial surge of crazy contracts and then sign guys without having to match high guarantees that other teams give. It's worked fine the last couple years and it will work out by the end of FA.

Team's have contingencies for the possibility of losing anyone that's a FA. Bengals are no different. They will bring in and draft players that fit the scheme and they will be there at the end of the year, just like the last 2, without putting themselves in cap hell in the future.

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo

Cuz the dude in the mirror is wearing a SB Champs shirt?

Yes. Size XXXL, covered in BBQ sauce.

rfaulk34 · 03-14-2023, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor

I said inch not millimeter. Don’t worry baby dick, I won’t tell!

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

That's not me in the mirror, hombre.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo

Cuz the dude in the mirror is wearing a SB Champs shirt?

Cooch. Pablo said you have a tiny dick.

09-04-2022, 04:07 PM
RaidersOftheCellar MVP Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Lawrence, KS Casino cash: $1600400	Are the Bills overhyped? Update: Yes, the Bills were overhyped. Last edited by RaidersOftheCellar; 09-25-2024 at 03:31 PM..
Posts: 15,968

03-14-2023, 03:36 PM	#3425
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $3073063	Bengals losing that pair of safeties is a bigger deal than people are giving credit for. It gave them a distinct strategic advantage when dealing with Kelce. It's part of why we struggle to score against them. With them out of the equation, they've lost a significant part of their formula for dealing with Kelce. __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 65,647	1 0