Football Broncos news megathread - Page 21

ROYC75 · 02:02 PM

Discussion: All things Broncos.

MagicHef · 11-03-2014, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Justin Houston added another 2 sacks to his league-leading total, bringing him to 12 on the season. That's 3 more than the next guy, the inferior Von Miller, who was kept sack-less today against the Patriots. Houston had 2 sacks against the Pats earlier in the year.

Be sure to run that in your common opponents measures next time, Hef.

Funny. Both of Houston's sacks today came while fighting through double teams.

Yep, great job dominating the Jets. At home.

Serious question: Why does Houston have so little yardage lost on his sacks? he's averaging like 4 yards lost per sack, Von is over 6. In fact, all the other guys over 7 sacks are averaging about 6 yards lost per sack.

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-03-2014, 01:00 PM

Well there is the coward. Knew you'd have a pointless bullshit stat

**BigMeatballDave** · 11-03-2014, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Yep, great job dominating the Jets. At home.

Serious question: Why does Houston have so little yardage lost on his sacks? he's averaging like 4 yards lost per sack, Von is over 6. In fact, all the other guys over 7 sacks are averaging about 6 yards lost per sack.

Magicbundle of sticks: The queen of splitting hairs.

**RealSNR** · 11-03-2014, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Yep, great job dominating the Jets. At home.

Serious question: Why does Houston have so little yardage lost on his sacks? he's averaging like 4 yards lost per sack, Von is over 6. In fact, all the other guys over 7 sacks are averaging about 6 yards lost per sack.

See, if Knowmo could troll like you, I'd like him a hell of a lot more.

ThaVirus · 11-03-2014, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

Yep, great job dominating the Jets. At home.

Serious question: Why does Houston have so little yardage lost on his sacks? he's averaging like 4 yards lost per sack, Von is over 6. In fact, all the other guys over 7 sacks are averaging about 6 yards lost per sack.

Probably because he gets to the QB more quickly. QBs have time to get to a 7 yard drop against Von and only enough time to get 4 yards deep against Houston ;-)

MagicHef · 11-03-2014, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Probably because he gets to the QB more quickly. QBs have time to get to a 7 yard drop against Von and only enough time to get 4 yards deep against Houston ;-)

His 1 yard sack against Locker was because he got there before Locker could even take a single step? I'm guessing it's the opposite, he's catching QBs that have decided to run before they can cross the LOS. Just for reference, none of Von's sacks are for less than 3 yards, 4 of Houston's are.

It is a credit to your secondary though, covering the receivers for long enough to force the QB into moving up that far.

**BigMeatballDave** · 11-03-2014, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

His 1 yard sack against Locker was because he got there before Locker could even take a single step? I'm guessing it's the opposite, he's catching QBs that have decided to run before they can cross the LOS. Just for reference, none of Von's sacks are for less than 3 yards, 4 of Houston's are.

It is a credit to your secondary though, covering the receivers for long enough to force the QB into moving up that far.

I'm laughing at you because I'm embarrassed for your dumbassery.

**TimBone** · 11-03-2014, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

His 1 yard sack against Locker was because he got there before Locker could even take a single step? I'm guessing it's the opposite, he's catching QBs that have decided to run before they can cross the LOS. Just for reference, none of Von's sacks are for less than 3 yards, 4 of Houston's are.

It is a credit to your secondary though, covering the receivers for long enough to force the QB into moving up that far.

Hahahahahahaha

Holy shit. Well done, sir.

Knowmo....This should be your new standard for trolling.

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-03-2014, 01:12 PM

What a pathetic post...wow

**TimBone** · 11-03-2014, 01:13 PM

lol. That really is impressive.

MagicHef · 11-03-2014, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave

I'm laughing at you because I'm embarrassed for your dumbassery.

Sure you are. As evidenced by my previous posts, I'm more concerned with effect on a game than stockpiling numbers. That's why I'm not particularly impressed by games like Aldon Smith's 5.5 sack effort against an overmatched opponent.

With that in mind, what is the functional difference between a sack at the LOS (for zero yards) and an incompletion? There isn't one. How much more valuable is a one yard sack? Not much.

MagicHef · 11-03-2014, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef

His 1 yard sack against Locker was because he got there before Locker could even take a single step? I'm guessing it's the opposite, he's catching QBs that have decided to run before they can cross the LOS. Just for reference, none of Von's sacks are for less than 3 yards, 4 of Houston's are.

It is a credit to your secondary though, covering the receivers for long enough to force the QB into moving up that far.

Sorry, I have to correct myself. Houston actually has 5 sacks for 2 or fewer yards, not 4. I missed his zero yard sack on Tannehill when I first went through the plays.

ThaVirus · 11-03-2014, 01:24 PM

Heh.

This is quite impressive.

I was actually joking, hence the gay ass smiley face, but I'd have to watch each sack to make a determination. It could just be the fact that teams gameplan for quick passes against us because we boast a top pass rush unit. We don't see many 5 and 7 step drops.

#PassRushCity

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-03-2014, 01:28 PM

Was Von or old washed up Ware even on the field in Foxboro? Pathetic efforts.

Pablo · 11-03-2014, 01:31 PM

Neat.

I'm sure the Chiefs and the market at large will really give two hot shits about the average depth of Houston's sacks when he's inking his well-deserved monster contract.

08-12-2014, 04:26 PM
ROYC75 Time For Your Wake Up Call !!! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Barn Yard Casino cash: $3781400	Broncos news megathread Discussion: All things Broncos. Last edited by ROYC75; 01-11-2017 at 02:02 PM.. Reason: Change Title, Please?
Posts: 37,408	4 2

11-03-2014, 01:00 PM	#302
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $1918880	Well there is the coward. Knew you'd have a pointless bullshit stat __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 72,041

11-03-2014, 01:12 PM	#309
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $1918880	What a pathetic post...wow __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 72,041

11-03-2014, 01:13 PM	#310
TimBone Mostly Ignored Join Date: Jul 2013 Casino cash: $8449985	lol. That really is impressive.
Posts: 18,097

11-03-2014, 01:24 PM	#313
ThaVirus Grand champ Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $-17631	Heh. This is quite impressive. I was actually joking, hence the gay ass smiley face, but I'd have to watch each sack to make a determination. It could just be the fact that teams gameplan for quick passes against us because we boast a top pass rush unit. We don't see many 5 and 7 step drops. #PassRushCity
Posts: 45,762

11-03-2014, 01:28 PM	#314
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $1918880	Was Von or old washed up Ware even on the field in Foxboro? Pathetic efforts. __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 72,041

11-03-2014, 01:31 PM	#315
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northland Casino cash: $-80644	Neat. I'm sure the Chiefs and the market at large will really give two hot shits about the average depth of Houston's sacks when he's inking his well-deserved monster contract.
Posts: 42,887