Chiefs Better to be lucky than good.... - Page 2

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:19 PM

The Chiefs were lucky to beat the Jags. That's just plain and simple. A dropped INT on a Foles duck, dropped INT by the Chiefs in the end zone to prevent a Jax score, an iffy call that could have been ruled a TD but was ruled a fumble by Jax, wide WIDE open receivers missed by Bortles....

For the most part Jax outplayed KC on both sides of the ball. They ran all over our defense and had guys open deep all game long. The Chiefs made some key stops when they absolutely had too but they were lucky to walk away with a win this game.

Nick Foles is not better than Smith. So let's just end that talk now. He looked like a statue in the pocket, missed wide open guys for scores and didn't see open receivers. I know, no Ware, Maclin and eventually Kelce hurts. But you can tell his accuracy is not even close to what Smith's is. He did make a nice pass to Wilson for our 1 TD of the day.

All day long the Chiefs, particularly the defense played with their head in the clouds. Multiple penalties, terrible tackling and rather unimpressive coverage on special teams.

A win is a win is a win. I would rather be lucky than good but the fact is, we were not good today. We were lucky.

arrwheader · 11-06-2016, 06:31 PM

You do realize we had backups at QB, RB, TE for awhile and no WR1....We led the entire game and the jags had like 4-5 turnovers. That's not being outplayed on both sides of the ball.

Broncos won the super bowl after winning multiple games like this and they never had to deal with injuries in one game like this.

Pretty sure a lot people on here need to stfu and enjoy the win. We were fortunate to get a bad team at home when we had so many injuries and come out with a win.

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-06-2016, 06:32 PM

All the Chiefs do is win, yet the same whiny ****s who bitched endlessly when they truly sucked still act like whiny ****s.

I there's a pattern here.

mschiefs1984 · 11-06-2016, 06:32 PM

The Jags did more to beat the Jags then the Chiefs did to beat them that much is for sure

oaklandhater · 11-06-2016, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mschiefs1984

The Jags did more to beat the Jags then the Chiefs did to beat them that much is for sure

Yup why jags fans are screaming to get bradly fired dude has lost his team

**Buzz** · 11-06-2016, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

That I disagree with. Our problem is stalling in the red zone.

Well, you could also chalk that up to some stupid play calling.

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arrwheader

You do realize we had backups at QB, RB, TE for awhile and no WR1....We led the entire game and the jags had like 4-5 turnovers. That's not being outplayed on both sides of the ball.

Broncos won the super bowl after winning multiple games like this and they never had to deal with injuries in one game like this.

Pretty sure a lot people on here need to stfu and enjoy the win. We were fortunate to get a bad team at home when we had so many injuries and come out with a win.

Sorry. We were lucky. These games happen. But you can't pretend we were good today because we really weren't. That doesn't mean we aren't a good team. Today though, we weren't very good. And if you listen to the players after the game, especially on defense, you will hear the same.

mschiefs1984 · 11-06-2016, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater

Yup why jags fans are screaming to get bradly fired dude has lost his team

Kind of reminded me of the 2012 Chiefs

Did all they could to lose the game ALL they could

arrwheader · 11-06-2016, 06:35 PM

Everyone is actin like we should have won 63-0 with a second string Chiefs team in. Jags have talent on both sides of the ball. We won as we should have in a way that was expected for as banged up as we were.

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz

Well, you could also chalk that up to some stupid play calling.

A lot of it, yes. We go away with what gets us down the field too much. Too many cute plays, gadget plays or sideways plays.

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-06-2016, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Sorry. We were lucky. These games happen. But you can't pretend we were good today because we really weren't. That doesn't mean we aren't a good team. Today though, we weren't very good. And if you listen to the players after the game, especially on defense, you will hear the same.

**** off, Pete. That's complete bullshit.

The Chiefs won, fair and square, despite starting their 3rd & 4th string RB, their 2nd string LG, losing Maclin early, losing Kelce and starting a 2nd string QB.

That's not luck, dipshit.

oaklandhater · 11-06-2016, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

**** off, Pete. That's complete bullshit.

The Chiefs won, fair and square, despite starting their 3rd & 4th string RB, their 2nd string LG, losing Maclin early, losing Kelce and starting a 2nd string QB.

That's not luck, dipshit.

Can we just say ware is the starter now Charles sadly is done the era is over

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-06-2016, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

A lot of it, yes. We go away with what gets us down the field too much. Too many cute plays, gadget plays or sideways plays.

That doesn't mean it's "luck" you butt****ing moron.

Get outta here with that shit.

arrwheader · 11-06-2016, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Sorry. We were lucky. These games happen. But you can't pretend we were good today because we really weren't. That doesn't mean we aren't a good team. Today though, we weren't very good. And if you listen to the players after the game, especially on defense, you will hear the same.

Sure but again most teams lose this game with a back up QB, RB, no WR1, and no Kelce for a good chunk of the game. What did you expect?

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arrwheader

Everyone is actin like we should have won 63-0 with a second string Chiefs team in. Jags have talent on both sides of the ball. We won as we should have in a way that was expected for as banged up as we were.

Our defense isn't that banged up. We got worked over on the ground and lucky Bortles missed guys that were so open down field they might as well have been on vacation.

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

That doesn't mean it's "luck" you butt****ing moron.

Get outta here with that shit.

Yeah, actually it does, you west coast, **** head...

That comment isn't about today's game, no reading, waste of space, hollywood loving douche nozzle

11-06-2016, 06:19 PM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-845873	Better to be lucky than good.... The Chiefs were lucky to beat the Jags. That's just plain and simple. A dropped INT on a Foles duck, dropped INT by the Chiefs in the end zone to prevent a Jax score, an iffy call that could have been ruled a TD but was ruled a fumble by Jax, wide WIDE open receivers missed by Bortles.... For the most part Jax outplayed KC on both sides of the ball. They ran all over our defense and had guys open deep all game long. The Chiefs made some key stops when they absolutely had too but they were lucky to walk away with a win this game. Nick Foles is not better than Smith. So let's just end that talk now. He looked like a statue in the pocket, missed wide open guys for scores and didn't see open receivers. I know, no Ware, Maclin and eventually Kelce hurts. But you can tell his accuracy is not even close to what Smith's is. He did make a nice pass to Wilson for our 1 TD of the day. All day long the Chiefs, particularly the defense played with their head in the clouds. Multiple penalties, terrible tackling and rather unimpressive coverage on special teams. A win is a win is a win. I would rather be lucky than good but the fact is, we were not good today. We were lucky.
Posts: 132,163

11-06-2016, 06:31 PM	#16
arrwheader Veteran Join Date: Dec 2011 Casino cash: $196613	You do realize we had backups at QB, RB, TE for awhile and no WR1....We led the entire game and the jags had like 4-5 turnovers. That's not being outplayed on both sides of the ball. Broncos won the super bowl after winning multiple games like this and they never had to deal with injuries in one game like this. Pretty sure a lot people on here need to stfu and enjoy the win. We were fortunate to get a bad team at home when we had so many injuries and come out with a win.
Posts: 3,547

11-06-2016, 06:32 PM	#17
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	All the Chiefs do is win, yet the same whiny **s who bitched endlessly when they truly sucked still act like whiny **s. I there's a pattern here.
Posts: 88,960

11-06-2016, 06:32 PM	#18
mschiefs1984 Veteran Join Date: Oct 2013 Casino cash: $3269760	The Jags did more to beat the Jags then the Chiefs did to beat them that much is for sure
Posts: 1,607

11-06-2016, 06:35 PM	#23
arrwheader Veteran Join Date: Dec 2011 Casino cash: $196613	Everyone is actin like we should have won 63-0 with a second string Chiefs team in. Jags have talent on both sides of the ball. We won as we should have in a way that was expected for as banged up as we were.
Posts: 3,547