MU ****The Official NEW new new conference realignment & shit talk thread**** - Page 162

**Saul Good** · 11-12-2013, 03:09 PM

Let's do it.

duncan_idaho · 01-24-2014, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Actually, they have him going to the Ravens.

Crap, I missed page 2.

So glad the Chiefs went with someone "safe" there, though!

warpaint* · 01-24-2014, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Why aren't the witnesses I've cited on the internet acceptable? Are they lying about what they saw? Should we give credence to one anonymous internet account here on ChiefsPlanet over several others?

The entire notion of one fan base giving another one a "standing o" for a championship is absurd. I've never heard of it happening anywhere, let alone Mizzou. If it were true it would be very embarrassing.

To your question the answer is no. Every person can & will make up their own mind but given the above I would need something probably beyond the shadow of doubt or at least reasonably close to that to believe it. We don't even have a preponderance of evidence.

It isn't so much a matter of saying you or anyone else is necessarily lying. First of all as you said, they're all anonymous internet sources. Credibility is a complete crap shoot. Second, what you have described could be unintentionally or intentionally exaggerated &/or open to interpretation. Or none of it could be & you & a couple others could be wrong about what you saw. Or you could all be exactly right in what you saw.

So in the absence of more concrete evidence no, I don't believe it.

Prison Bitch · 01-24-2014, 09:09 AM

Sure, there's an element of perspectives here. The main point is that there's plenty of smoke around the fire, and for Saul-MN et al to completely dismiss it without knowing either way is far more stupid than an unproved claim.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Sure, there's an element of perspectives here. The main point is that there's plenty of smoke around the fire, and for Saul-MN et al to completely dismiss it without knowing either way is far more stupid than an unproved claim.

WTF are you talking about? I said the PA announcer acknowledged it. There was no ovation, and I don't give a shit either way...a year ago. I've been asking...as has MN...for you to quote the comments about the SEC having all this money while all the other conferences would be paupers. There were only 26 comments, so it shouldn't be hard to find...unless you lied...which you did.

Bambi · 01-24-2014, 09:20 AM

The SEC and SEC Network were in great shape to land truck loads of cash up until the recent bowls when they got smacked down like bitches.

warpaint* · 01-24-2014, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

The SEC and SEC Network were in great shape to land truck loads of cash up until the recent bowls when they got smacked down like bitches.

?

They had the best record?

The Sun Belt's sparkling 2-0 not w/ standing.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

The SEC and SEC Network were in great shape to land truck loads of cash up until the recent bowls when they got smacked down like bitches.

I thought they won a record number of bowl games finishing the BCS era as the only major conference with a winning record in bowl games. But what do I know? I watch the games, and according to Prison Bitch, that's a waste of time that could be better spent checking computer models that tell me what should have happened rather than what actually happened.

Bambi · 01-24-2014, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpaint*

?

They had the best record?

The Sun Belt's sparkling 2-0 not w/ standing.

Those other bowls are nice but for the big money there are only 5 that matter. Fiesta, Orange, Rose, Sugar and BCS.

0-2 hurts when trying to launch a network for $1.30 a subscriber.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

Those other bowls are nice but for the big money there are only 5 that matter. Fiesta, Orange, Rose, Sugar and BCS.

0-2 hurts when trying to launch a network for $1.30 a subscriber.

I didn't realize that only BCS bowls mattered. That 17-10 all time record for the SEC is going to be a much bigger deal than I realized.

The SEC has a winning record in BCS bowls against every major conference but one.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 10:06 AM

Http://mrsec.com/2014/01/conference-...cords-BCS-era/

Bambi · 01-24-2014, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I didn't realize that only BCS bowls mattered. That 17-10 all time record for the SEC is going to be a much bigger deal than I realized.

The SEC has a winning record in BCS bowls against every major conference but one.

According to the ratings and payouts yes, they're the only bowls that matter.

It's akin to reaching a Final Four. People remember Final Four teams, no one remembers simply making the tournament.

That being said we all know that when it comes to TV deals and such it is important to strike while the iron's hot. Not shit the bed like the SEC did this year.

I still think the SEC Network is going to get off the ground but just imagine what could have been.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

According to the ratings and payouts yes, they're the only bowls that matter.

It's akin to reaching a Final Four. People remember Final Four teams, no one remembers simply making the tournament.

That being said we all know that when it comes to TV deals and such it is important to strike while the iron's hot. Not shit the bed like the SEC did this year.

I still think the SEC Network is going to get off the ground but just imagine what could have been.

So people remember who lost in the Final Four, but they don't remember who lost in BCS games? Good point.

warpaint* · 01-24-2014, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

Those other bowls are nice but for the big money there are only 5 that matter. Fiesta, Orange, Rose, Sugar and BCS.

0-2 hurts when trying to launch a network for $1.30 a subscriber.

You must be really hurting for material although you shouldn't be.
If I were you I'd focus on the dumpster fire that is the CFH regime but that's just me.

Bambi · 01-24-2014, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpaint*

You must be really hurting for material although you shouldn't be.
If I were you I'd focus on the dumpster fire that is the CFH regime but that's just me.

People say stupid shit they're going to get called out on it.

It's come home to roost for Clay Travis and his idiotic followers.

**Saul Good** · 01-24-2014, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi

People say stupid shit they're going to get called out on it.

It's come home to roost for Clay Travis and his idiotic followers.

He's nailed realignment more than any other writer.

11-12-2013, 03:09 PM
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	**The Official NEW new new conference realignment & shit talk thread** Let's do it.
Posts: 41,870

01-24-2014, 09:09 AM	#2418
Prison Bitch Rabbi Goldmann Join Date: Nov 2012 Casino cash: $5450159	Sure, there's an element of perspectives here. The main point is that there's plenty of smoke around the fire, and for Saul-MN et al to completely dismiss it without knowing either way is far more stupid than an unproved claim.
Posts: 87,025

01-24-2014, 09:20 AM	#2420
Bambi Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York City Casino cash: $10036993	The SEC and SEC Network were in great shape to land truck loads of cash up until the recent bowls when they got smacked down like bitches.
Posts: 17,810

01-24-2014, 10:06 AM	#2425
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	Http://mrsec.com/2014/01/conference-...cords-BCS-era/ __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870