So, got in a brawl tonight

[tooge]

Ok, so I'm an asst coCh of a 10u baseball team. Had a game tonight. I sorta sit off to the side and watch. I'm more of a practice coach.

Anyhow, I notice a dad bitching at the head coach and cussing at an asst coach in front of the boys. He called a coach "shit for brains".

Sooo, guy takes his kid and leaves the game in the 2nd inning. Calls coach a deuche? And I say " if you'd called me that, I'd be punchin your teeth in (. Building up biz). So guy comes back, gets in my face, I out him in a choke hold, and he gives. Takes his boy home. Sad deal. Soooo, I sent an email to aPologize for the whole thing , and the guy says he
Ll believe I'm sincere if I send it to all the Parents. Reeally?
What would y'all do?

[blaise]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

What is the actual definition of a brawl, anyway? My definition would be this:

1. Must involve six or more people.

Plus

2. No weapons that are actual weapons. All weapons must be improvised.

Plus

3. There are more than two teams in the brawl.

Plus any two of the following three

a. Someone gets thrown through a window.
b. Someone gets hit in the back with a chair.
c. Someone gets thrown through a swinging door of some kind.

Am I correct?

I think the brawl itself must be unplanned, as well. If planned or organized it then falls into the Rumble category.

[Aries Walker]

I was going to post YouTubes of the scenes from West Side Story and Green Street Hooligans, but by that definition, they're not brawls because they were both planned. Drat.

I'm not too sure about the 'More Than Two Teams' limitation. That would outlaw most of The Warriors, which really should qualify.

[Marty Mac Ver 2.0]

Originally Posted by Phobia

Awesome. Break some coffeetables and post a video.

[Nightfyre]

Originally Posted by blaise

I think the brawl itself must be unplanned, as well. If planned or organized it then falls into the Rumble category.

Good post. +1

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

What is the actual definition of a brawl, anyway? My definition would be this:

1. Must involve six or more people.

Plus

2. No weapons that are actual weapons. All weapons must be improvised.

Plus

3. There are more than two teams in the brawl.

Plus any two of the following three

a. Someone gets thrown through a window.
b. Someone gets hit in the back with a chair.
c. Someone gets thrown through a swinging door of some kind.

Am I correct?

Someone has to be wearing a wife-beater.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by loochy

How awesome would it be if we all posted as wrestlers again?

[BigCatDaddy]

Originally Posted by PGM

How awesome would it be if we all posted as wrestlers again?

Not very.

[Chiefnj2]

Tooge,

If you are an assistant coach of the team you should know the parents, the parents should know you, and you should be able to speak to them in an adult manner.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by PGM

How awesome would it be if we all posted as wrestlers again?

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

Not very.

Very.

[Predarat]

Retract your apology and tell him to DIAFAT

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Predarat

Retract your apology and tell him to DIAFAT

What's the extra AT?

[Frazod]

Originally Posted by loochy

What's the extra AT?

AIDS TREE, moran.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by frazod

AIDS TREE, moran.

i thought that, but it doesn't make sense

the dude needs to Die In A Fire Aids Tree?

maybe Die Under A Firey Aids Tree makes sense

or maybe Die From A Firey Aids Tree

but not IN the aids tree, because why would someone climb an aids tree?

[raybec 4]

Originally Posted by loochy

i thought that, but it doesn't make sense

the dude needs to Die In A Fire Aids Tree?

maybe Die Under A Firey Aids Tree makes sense

or maybe Die From A Firey Aids Tree

but not IN the aids tree, because why would someone climb an aids tree?

Because the AIDS tree is flaming, of course

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by PGM

How awesome would it be if we all posted as wrestlers again?

It'd be just as lame as it was last time...