Broncos news megathread

[ROYC75]

Discussion: All things Broncos.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Kelce didn't have a single catch against us week 17

Why is that? Here is some visual aid if you need it.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good

And as far as one big play then being invisible goes - neither Hill or Watkins are those players- so nothing to worry about there. They've both proven to be extremely talented and productive when targeted. It's just up to the coach and qb to get them the ball. Unfortunately Goff didn't do that last year and routinely missed Watkins or didn't throw his way despite him constantly being open.

I thought Hill was pretty quiet in your playoff game. He had a big play early on and didn't do much the rest of the game.

Watkins and Hill aren't reliable on a down by down basis like Hopkins, Julio Jones, and Antonio Brown are. The Chiefs can get by because Kelce is that guy for them, but if Kelce isn't in there or if a team takes him away the Chiefs will have trouble on 3rd downs.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Why is that? Here is some visual aid if you need it.

It was a joke.

[Mile High Mania]

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good

What's wrong with talking football? You should try it some time.

Ha... that's about all I do.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Kelce didn't have a single catch against us week 17

Touché Knomo touché

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

It was a joke.

Ah. I didn't know you were still joking around on here after that badass threat you made to Dane. I don't feel like getting punched in the mouth.

[Bewbies]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

I thought Hill was pretty quiet in your playoff game. He had a big play early on and didn't do much the rest of the game.

Watkins and Hill aren't reliable on a down by down basis like Hopkins, Julio Jones, and Antonio Brown are. The Chiefs can get by because Kelce is that guy for them, but if Kelce isn't in there or if a team takes him away the Chiefs will have trouble on 3rd downs.

We sent the main part of that problem to Washington for a 3rd round pick and a stud CB.

[Bewbies]

Also, please don't punch me in the mouth.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Also, please don't punch me in the mouth.

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Bewbies

We sent the main part of that problem to Washington for a 3rd round pick and a stud CB.

I was about to say the same thing..........

[KranzDictum]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

I thought Hill was pretty quiet in your playoff game. He had a big play early on and didn't do much the rest of the game.

Watkins and Hill aren't reliable on a down by down basis like Hopkins, Julio Jones, and Antonio Brown are. The Chiefs can get by because Kelce is that guy for them, but if Kelce isn't in there or if a team takes him away the Chiefs will have trouble on 3rd downs.

Hill was quite because he had some big drops early then after Kelce went out the Titans, (HAHAHAHA THE FREAKING TITANS DOWN BY 18!!! LOL) were able to roll coverage to Hill.

I said not having a 2nd WR would hurt kFc after they cut Macklin and got trashed for it yet it happened in the biggest game of the year.

If Watkins is 100% healthy it will be a good signing for them but it is a big gamble. I would have found a cheaper option at WR2 like the kid from the Seahawks who I think signed with Washington and then addressed the pass rush or CB's. If they waited a week they might have landed Suh which would have probably helped more in the long run but no one was expecting that cut.

[Red Dawg]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

I thought Hill was pretty quiet in your playoff game. He had a big play early on and didn't do much the rest of the game.

Watkins and Hill aren't reliable on a down by down basis like Hopkins, Julio Jones, and Antonio Brown are. The Chiefs can get by because Kelce is that guy for them, but if Kelce isn't in there or if a team takes him away the Chiefs will have trouble on 3rd downs.

What? Yeah right. Kelce was that guy for Smith because his arm is weak and his game has limits in tight windows. Mahomes has no limits so thinking we are screwed on third down is stupid.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by KranzDictum

Hill was quite because he had some big drops early then after Kelce went out the Titans, (HAHAHAHA THE FREAKING TITANS DOWN BY 18!!! LOL) were able to roll coverage to Hill.

I said not having a 2nd WR would hurt kFc after they cut Macklin and got trashed for it yet it happened in the biggest game of the year.

If Watkins is 100% healthy it will be a good signing for them but it is a big gamble. I would have found a cheaper option at WR2 like the kid from the Seahawks who I think signed with Washington and then addressed the pass rush or CB's. If they waited a week they might have landed Suh which would have probably helped more in the long run but no one was expecting that cut.

Alex Smith ain’t walking through that door **** boy! Mahomes will shred Denver like he was doing in week 17 (HAHAHAHA WITH BACKUPS AND THIRD STRINGERS)

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

I thought Hill was pretty quiet in your playoff game. He had a big play early on and didn't do much the rest of the game.

Watkins and Hill aren't reliable on a down by down basis like Hopkins, Julio Jones, and Antonio Brown are. The Chiefs can get by because Kelce is that guy for them, but if Kelce isn't in there or if a team takes him away the Chiefs will have trouble on 3rd downs.

Alex Smith could have Julio Jones, Jerry Rice and Tony Gonzalez and he’d still **** up when it matters.

[Mile High Mania]

Oh no... Cody Latimer signed with the Giants.