15K penis's examined. How do you measure up?

[BigRedChief]

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and...age-penis-size

This study seems to contradict the fact that every male on Chiefs Planet is packing serious length and girth. Poll is private.

Cliff notes:
The average flaccid penis was found to be 9.16 cm (3.61 inches) long, whereas the average erect penis is 13.12 cm (5.16 inches) in length.

Only 5 men out of every 100 have an erect penis longer than 16 cm (6.3 inches).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, a study which may lay to rest some of the lingering fallacies about penis size and alleviate the woes shared by many men worldwide. According to new research, the average erect penis length is just over 13 centimeters, or around 5 inches. Furthermore, there’s no strong association between foot size and penis length, so women can stop judging men by the size of their shoes. You can read the entire study in BJU International.


Although many compare themselves to the “average” penis size, what this figure actually is has been surprisingly difficult to determine. As pointed out by Science, that’s mainly because most studies have relied on self-reporting, which isn’t very accurate. To get around this problem and obtain a more reliable data set, a team of U.K. researchers decided to compile measurements taken by health professionals who followed a standardized measuring procedure. They included both girth (the circumference at the base or the middle) and length (pubic bone to the tip of the glans) measurements from 20 different studies, which totaled 15,521 men from various countries across the world. And the results will be music to the ears of many.


The average flaccid penis was found to be 9.16 cm (3.61 inches) long, whereas the average erect penis is 13.12 cm (5.16 inches) in length. In terms of girth, the average circumference of a flaccid penis turned out to be 9.31 cm (3.66 inches), and 11.66 cm (4.59 inches) for an erect one. Furthermore, those at extreme ends of the spectrum were found to be much less common. For example, only 5 men out of every 100 have an erect penis longer than 16 cm (6.3 inches).


When they looked for correlations with other body features, such as testicular size, weight or foot size, no strong or consistent associations were found. Although they couldn’t find any significant evidence for a relationship between penis size and race, they note that conclusions can’t be drawn since the vast majority of measurements were from Caucasians.
So what’s the take home message? Men, don’t be so hard on yourself as what you see on the TV or in magazines is not an accurate representation of the average penis. But if you’re concerned, make sure you’re measuring correctly.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does Size matter?
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and...really-matter0

Humans are, in general, very conscious of their appearance. If we’re not sucking in our bellies for photographs we’re fixing our hair or hitting the gym for that extra round butt. Guys are also faced with the age old question: does size really matter?



You’ll be pleased to know that humans have the biggest penis of any primate both in terms of absolute size and relative proportion. High five.



But do men need bigger penises? What do women say? Does your package make you more or less attractive, or affect partner satisfaction? Check out this 3 minute video from AsapSCIENCE for some interesting facts and studies on the topic:

[Katipan]

Originally Posted by stevieray

Jenny McCarthys Playboy spread in the soapy bathtub

The nose picking doesn't throw you off at all?

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

I got into a CP fight years ago with Dirk Digler who swore he ran a 4.3 40

...we had like 25 CP'ers who ran 4.5 40's or better in high school

I remember that.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by Katipan

The nose picking doesn't throw you off at all?

She has a nose?

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Creepy

still waiting you ****ing liar

[TimBone]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

are you serious? If there isn't dick in the porn I'm watching, color me dissatisfied

Originally Posted by Pablo

Porn is penetration! I tend to agree. I don't want to just watch two girls swapping saliva on their south-mouths. That doesn't really do it for me. I need some jackhammer action.

As gay as it sounds, I need the dick in my porn as well.

What I dont understand though, is why they would EVER show the dudes face. Ive been knee deep on a jerk session, focusing on a hot chick taking the D like a champ, and all of a sudden the camera pans away from the girl and gives a full camera shot of the guy. Completely ruined it for me. Couldnt even finish.

[ThaVirus]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

I got into a CP fight years ago with Dirk Digler who swore he ran a 4.3 40

...we had like 25 CP'ers who ran 4.5 40's or better in high school

That thread was hilarious.

Paraphrasing one of your quotes: "Dirk Digler on Chiefsplanet runs faster than Jamaal Charles".

Many a laugh came from that thread..

[Hootie]

there were like 5 guys on my shitty football team in high school who ran "4.2" 40s

you know

because those high school football coach stop watches are so accurate (and they aren't trying to build up a false sense of confidence into these kids)

I don't think anyone realizes how fast a ****ing 4.7 40 is ... let alone a Chris Johnson 4.24

[ThaVirus]

Originally Posted by TimBone

As gay as it sounds, I need the dick in my porn as well.

What I dont understand though, is why they would EVER show the dudes face. Ive been knee deep on a jerk session, focusing on a hot chick taking the D like a champ, and all of a sudden the camera pans away from the girl and gives a full camera shot of the guy. Completely ruined it for me. Couldnt even finish.

The worst is when you've hit the point of no return and they zoom in on the guy's face simultaneously. You're forced to just close your eyes and imagine or try and skip forward to a point where they're showing the chick again but it's usually too late at that point.

Talk about ruining a good nut..

[TimBone]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

The worst is when you've hit the point of no return and they zoom in on the guy's face simultaneously. You're forced to just close your eyes and imagine or try and skip forward to a point where they're showing the chick again but it's usually too late at that point.

Talk about ruining a good nut..

Hahahaha....yep I've been there. There's been a number of times where I've nutted to the video buffering because they panned to the dude at that point of no return and I clicked on another random point of the video in a panic.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

The worst is when you've hit the point of no return and they zoom in on the guy's face simultaneously. You're forced to just close your eyes and imagine or try and skip forward to a point where they're showing the chick again but it's usually too late at that point.

Talk about ruining a good nut..

You gotta pay to play the game.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

there were like 5 guys on my shitty football team in high school who ran "4.2" 40s

you know

because those high school football coach stop watches are so accurate (and they aren't trying to build up a false sense of confidence into these kids)

I don't think anyone realizes how fast a ****ing 4.7 40 is ... let alone a Chris Johnson 4.24

Andrew Luck, an elite athlete at 6'4" and 230 pounds ran a 4.67.

And that's just not quite up to snuff here on CP.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

there were like 5 guys on my shitty football team in high school who ran "4.2" 40s

you know

because those high school football coach stop watches are so accurate (and they aren't trying to build up a false sense of confidence into these kids)

I don't think anyone realizes how fast a ****ing 4.7 40 is ... let alone a Chris Johnson 4.24

I do.

I ran a 10.8 100 meter sprint in high school. I know how fast a 4.4 is because I ran a legit 4.4. There was one guy faster than me (that got a D1 scholarship for track) and one guy the same speed as me. The coach made me run it 3 times because he thought he ****ed up when he clocked the first one.

The guys who run 10.2s and below are amazingly fast.

[Nzoner]

Originally Posted by TimBone

What I dont understand though, is why they would EVER show the dudes face. Ive been knee deep on a jerk session, focusing on a hot chick taking the D like a champ, and all of a sudden the camera pans away from the girl and gives a full camera shot of the guy. Completely ruined it for me. Couldnt even finish.

This is why you should always watch first before jerking,you find a scene/spot that you really like then rewind a bit and commence.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by KC native

I do.

I ran a 10.8 100 meter sprint in high school. I know how fast a 4.4 is because I ran a legit 4.4. There was one guy faster than me (that got a D1 scholarship for track) and one guy the same speed as me. The coach made me run it 3 times because he thought he ****ed up when he clocked the first one.

The guys who run 10.2s and below are amazingly fast.

and you had to drag that big dick along with you. Could have shaved off .3 of that time with a normal dick.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

The worst is when you've hit the point of no return and they zoom in on the guy's face simultaneously. You're forced to just close your eyes and imagine or try and skip forward to a point where they're showing the chick again but it's usually too late at that point.

Talk about ruining a good nut..