Chiefs Would getting the 2nd seed actually be benificial? - Page 4

BlackOp · 11:56 PM

If the Chiefs get the 2nd seed...they can likely rest their starters week 18. That game would be against the Donks...fighting for their post-season lives. If Denver were to win, they would play a rested KC the very next week @ Arrowhead. Two weeks to game plan in earnest while playing vanilla in the first meeting...Donks cant hold anything back.

Conversely, there is a chance the Ravens might be the lowest seed remaining after the first week of the play-offs. They would travel to the Bills. KC might see the Texans in week 2...

Bills lose to Ravens, KC gets HFA for the AFCCG...

Chiefs are in a good position to get a least some rest either way...obviously a first round bye is preferable but the 2nd seed might not be terrible either.

Marcellus · Today, 09:51 AM

Ridiculous question at this point. They need the bye week more than anything else.

BlackOp · Today, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not?

Why would we want to avoid the Ravens? Lamar is trash in big games.

Chiefs wouldn't avoid the Ravens in the scenario I posted...Baltimore would play the Bills in Orchard Park. That is contingent on the Steelers winning the AFCN.

At any rate...dont care enough about this topic to interact with internet chest-beaters....not you...just not going to play along with the vicarious pile-on.

Chiefs get the #1,2,3,4 seed...it's nothing I control.

Somehow this got turned into that I'd prefer KC not get the #1 seed...was just illustrating a potential plan B scenario.

Marcellus · Today, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp

Chiefs wouldn't avoid the Ravens in the scenario I posted...Baltimore would play the Bills in Orchard Park. That is contingent on the Steelers winning the AFCN.

At any rate...dont care enough about this topic to interact with internet chest-beaters....not you...just not going to play along with the vicarious pile-on.

Chiefs get the #1,2,3,4 seed...it's nothing I control.

Aside from needing the bye week to get some rest there is another huge reason.

Playing 1 more game than necessary increases the likelihood of injury by a lot.

We have lost several players due to injury in playoff games including Mahomes for short stretches (that effected his play in other games after) and several OL over the years along with some important defensive players.

Playing 1 more game unnecessarily means 1 more game you might just have an off day.

Its a ridiculous question, in no scenario is the 2 seed a better option.

BlackOp · Today, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Its a ridiculous question, in no scenario is the 2 seed a better option.

I never implied it was a "better" option...only it could also work out to the Chiefs advantage.

People are ****ing weird when it comes to football....got Bills fans hitting some stranger in face with a dildo breaking his glasses...really brings out the low IQ territorials.

OMG OMG OMG...dont you dare mention KC not getting the #1 seed...my whole self-worth is tethered to it.

Mile High Mania · Today, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp

Get back in the 3rd place cellar where you belong...Donko scum.

This thread is about a team with actual SB aspirations...

Geez...win a few games against bottom feeders and they crawl out of the woodwork.

Yes, I’ve been in the woodwork. You sure get wound up for someone that believes the league is fixed.

cmh6476 · Today, 10:16 AM

yeah let's play one extra playoff game.

Not.

RunKC · Today, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp

Chiefs wouldn't avoid the Ravens in the scenario I posted...Baltimore would play the Bills in Orchard Park. That is contingent on the Steelers winning the AFCN.

At any rate...dont care enough about this topic to interact with internet chest-beaters....not you...just not going to play along with the vicarious pile-on.

Chiefs get the #1,2,3,4 seed...it's nothing I control.

Somehow this got turned into that I'd prefer KC not get the #1 seed...was just illustrating a potential plan B scenario.

The Broncos will get the 7th seed and we will play them in the WC. The problem there is they have the best pass rush in the league and have throttled our offense 3 games in a row.

Do not underestimate how much of a bitch it will be playing those guys. Vance Joseph knows our offense since he’s seen it so many times.

Yes I still think we would win but the grind this team has taken is nuts. Any of us would rather take the bye then play a divisional team that knows us well and wants revenge for a game they should have won.

BlackOp · Today, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Yes, I’ve been in the woodwork. You sure get wound up for someone that believes the league is fixed.

You just think I get worked up...the NFL is going to do what the NFL does.

There is a thread on every teams forum about the "fixed" topic...so dont act like that opinion is some abstract outlier.

If it's "fixed"...it's for the team I watch...so I'll take it...dont really have a choice...it's just entertainment. Mahomes is the #1 sports rating darling in the world...of course the NFL is going to milk it...greed is their thing.

O.city · Today, 10:31 AM

If they don't get the bye, the 2 wouldn't be the worst idea. Just have to hope someone goes in and beats Buffalo or whoever gets the 1 in the divisional round.

**BigRedChief** · Today, 10:31 AM

HFA is now basically tied with the Bills. We lose, they win HFA. We need that week of rest more than anytime during this run.

The Bills should lose at least lose one more. That gives us the bye IF we win out. Bur, we would need to still win out till that final game.

-King- · Today, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Yes, I’ve been in the woodwork. You sure get wound up for someone that believes the league is fixed.

Was going to post this. It's always hilarious seeing the "ITS RIGGED" people try to discuss strategies. If it's rigged, why does it matter? The league will rig which seed we end up with and if we win the games in the playoffs right?

pugsnotdrugs19 · Today, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

No.

Not even a little bit.

We want the 1 seed. In all reality, we probably NEED the 1 seed.

Last year was definitely the team best equipped to pull off a road run. This one would be close IF the defense gets their feet back underneath them on a level comparable to 2023.

But that team was built to win anywhere. Not pretty, but they could pack that defense up and a solid playoff ground game wherever they went.

**wazu** · Today, 10:35 AM

Alternative proposal - After the Carolina game/win just rest starters rest of the year and take the 7 seed. No injuries, just get healthy, hold practices, and draw up crazy game plans for our likely playoff match-ups.

O.city · Today, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Last year was definitely the team best equipped to pull off a road run. This one would be close IF the defense gets their feet back underneath them on a level comparable to 2023.

But that team was built to win anywhere. Not pretty, but they could pack that defense up and a solid playoff ground game wherever they went.

It was also a pretty improbable run. I'd prefer not to have to do that again.

tredadda · Today, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9

No, they can rest there starters for most of week 18, have a nice little bye week, have homefield advantage, and they'd only have 2 games to play before the SB instead of 3 games. Getting the bye lessens the chances of having injury.

This 100%. One fewer opponent, one more week of rest will always trump three games against possible opponents.

Yesterday, 11:46 PM
BlackOp MVP Join Date: Oct 2012 Casino cash: $4405267	Would getting the 2nd seed actually be benificial? If the Chiefs get the 2nd seed...they can likely rest their starters week 18. That game would be against the Donks...fighting for their post-season lives. If Denver were to win, they would play a rested KC the very next week @ Arrowhead. Two weeks to game plan in earnest while playing vanilla in the first meeting...Donks cant hold anything back. Conversely, there is a chance the Ravens might be the lowest seed remaining after the first week of the play-offs. They would travel to the Bills. KC might see the Texans in week 2... Bills lose to Ravens, KC gets HFA for the AFCCG... Chiefs are in a good position to get a least some rest either way...obviously a first round bye is preferable but the 2nd seed might not be terrible either. Last edited by BlackOp; Yesterday at 11:56 PM..
Posts: 18,627

Today, 10:16 AM	#51
cmh6476 Keep Camp Home! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: St Joe MO Casino cash: $656277	yeah let's play one extra playoff game. Not. __________________ from September to February! from November to April! from April to October! 2024 Adopt-a-Chief: Xavier Worthy
Posts: 10,586

Today, 10:31 AM	#54
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $994064	If they don't get the bye, the 2 wouldn't be the worst idea. Just have to hope someone goes in and beats Buffalo or whoever gets the 1 in the divisional round.
Posts: 83,005	1 0

Today, 10:31 AM	#55
BigRedChief Has a particular set of skills Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: On the water Casino cash: $1018962 VARSITY	HFA is now basically tied with the Bills. We lose, they win HFA. We need that week of rest more than anytime during this run. The Bills should lose at least lose one more. That gives us the bye IF we win out. Bur, we would need to still win out till that final game. __________________ Mind you own damn business
Posts: 80,264

Today, 10:35 AM	#58
wazu ... Join Date: May 2002 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $142295 VARSITY	Alternative proposal - After the Carolina game/win just rest starters rest of the year and take the 7 seed. No injuries, just get healthy, hold practices, and draw up crazy game plans for our likely playoff match-ups.
Posts: 29,407