MU ****The Official NEW new new conference realignment & shit talk thread**** - Page 20

**Saul Good** · 11-12-2013, 03:09 PM

Let's do it.

kchero · 11-22-2013, 07:30 AM

KU trolls full steam into bball, let's be honest they already were since august.

**Saulbadguy** · 11-22-2013, 08:29 AM

Scoreboard.

**Saul Good** · 11-22-2013, 08:40 AM

So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

**Saulbadguy** · 11-22-2013, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

Big XII. WVU is hurting right now but I think they will become competitive and a valuable addition. TCU should have never been invited, they are worthless.

After that, it's a push. CU is a mess and has been for the better part of 10 years. Rutgers? Meh.

**Saul Good** · 11-22-2013, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Big XII. WVU is hurting right now but I think they will become competitive and a valuable addition. TCU should have never been invited, they are worthless.

Would you favor expanding? If so, with whom?

Cincy and UCF are looking better by the day, IMO.

**Saulbadguy** · 11-22-2013, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Would you favor expanding? If so, with whom?

Cincy and UCF are looking better by the day, IMO.

Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

kchero · 11-22-2013, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

I saw something like this on an SEC rivals board. The consensus there was the best move was the SEC getting Mizzou and ATM and the worst move was split between the Big 12 and the recent moves of the BIG with Maryland and Rutgers.

**Saul Good** · 11-22-2013, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

Why not Cincy? They would be at least average in both sports, expand the footprint, and help bridge the gap to WV.

**Saulbadguy** · 11-22-2013, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Why not Cincy? They would be at least average in both sports, expand the footprint, and help bridge the gap to WV.

Eh, I don't really have a good reason. They would be a better addition than TCU but worse than UCF/USF IMO.

**Saul Good** · 11-22-2013, 09:56 AM

South Florida would be a terrible add. Gross. I guess I could sort of understand taking them with UCF with the thought process being that neither of them really gives you a strong presence in Florida by themselves, but having both of them might.

Prison Bitch · 11-22-2013, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

That's really dumb, sorry.

Prison Bitch · 11-22-2013, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchero

I saw something like this on an SEC rivals board. The consensus there was the best move was the SEC getting Mizzou and ATM and the worst move was split between the Big 12 and the recent moves of the BIG with Maryland and Rutgers.

God, this post was reeruned.

GoChargers · 11-22-2013, 11:23 AM

IMO, the smartest play for the Big 12 might be to add BYU and Boise. BYU brings a huge nationwide fanbase, Boise adds a strong football brand in a conference starving for those. They'd certainly get better ratings than Cincy or UCF would. This would expand the Big 12's footprint and allow them to directly compete with the PAC.

kchero · 11-22-2013, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

God, this post was reeruned.

Funny you say that considering the moronic shit that comes out of your mouth. Its funny how you consistently come in here and get your ass handed to you and yet you come back for more.

DJ's left nut · 11-22-2013, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers

IMO, the smartest play for the Big 12 might be to add BYU and Boise. BYU brings a huge nationwide fanbase, Boise adds a strong football brand in a conference starving for those. They'd certainly get better ratings than Cincy or UCF would. This would expand the Big 12's footprint and allow them to directly compete with the PAC.

When I gave a large rat's ass what happened to the Big 12, I was hoping they'd add BYU (for precisely the reason you stated) and make a hard push to add Air Force.

I know, it seems like a bizarre add, but Air Force has a routinely credible football program. Moreover, there is a prestige associated with the service acadamies.

Both schools would give you something of a national cache. They'd have provided strong academics, a pretty pristine reputation for excellence in fields other than athletics, and a couple of solid football programs that occasionally make a little noise in basketball. Air Force would've even been a solid regional pickup and BYU damn sure wouldn't have been any worse from a geography perspective than WVU.

Instead they added another Texas school, just a far worse one and a school from the armpit of America that nobody gives a rip about.

Those still feel like panic adds to me.

11-12-2013, 03:09 PM
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	**The Official NEW new new conference realignment & shit talk thread** Let's do it.
Posts: 41,870

11-22-2013, 07:30 AM	#286
kchero Veteran Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $9978240	KU trolls full steam into bball, let's be honest they already were since august.
Posts: 1,731

11-22-2013, 08:29 AM	#287
Saulbadguy When a nightmare becomes real Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $736966	Scoreboard. __________________ http://www.goemaw.com
Posts: 47,020

11-22-2013, 08:40 AM	#288
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment? PAC: Colorado and Utah B1G: Maryland and Rutgers Big 12: West Virginia and TCU __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870

11-22-2013, 09:56 AM	#295
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	South Florida would be a terrible add. Gross. I guess I could sort of understand taking them with UCF with the thought process being that neither of them really gives you a strong presence in Florida by themselves, but having both of them might. __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870

11-22-2013, 11:23 AM	#298
GoChargers Dean Spanos is a Traitor Join Date: Oct 2012 Casino cash: $10013554	IMO, the smartest play for the Big 12 might be to add BYU and Boise. BYU brings a huge nationwide fanbase, Boise adds a strong football brand in a conference starving for those. They'd certainly get better ratings than Cincy or UCF would. This would expand the Big 12's footprint and allow them to directly compete with the PAC. __________________ Disclaimer: my username refers to the SAN DIEGO Chargers only. I will never cheer for the LA Chargers as long as the Spanos family owns the team.
Posts: 3,620

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode