Trade whatever possible for a LT prospect

[RunKC]

I don’t care. If there’s a LT in this draft that they feel can be a good quality LT, do it.

I don’t care if it would cost three 1st rd picks. Mahomes is not gonna be this athletic for much longer.

It needs to happen

[Couch-Potato]

I’m playing now, but how’bout 2 firsts and Rice for Tyreek and Simmons. We find a way to keep Smith and Brown… we just lay into speed receivers with Hill, Worthy, and Brown and let them fly all over the field lol

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato

I’m playing now, but how’bout 2 firsts and Rice for Tyreek and Simmons. We find a way to keep Smith and Brown… we just lay into speed receivers with Hill, Worthy, and Brown and let them fly all over the field lol

Delete your account.

[Couch-Potato]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

Delete your account.

lol fair.

[RealSNR]

Can the fatties just this once have their own goddamn thread without people talking about Tyreek ****ing Hill????

[New World Order]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Can the fatties just this once have their own goddamn thread without people talking about Tyreek ****ing Hill????

What if it’s Tyreek at possibly LT

[kccrow]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Can the fatties just this once have their own goddamn thread without people talking about Tyreek ****ing Hill????

Amen.

[Semichief]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Ask yourself this about Alaric Jackson: why are the Rams not tagging him? LT is the 2nd most valuable position on a team. They have a healthy cap amount of $44 million and are apparently planning on trading away Stafford’s bloated contract. Joe Noteboom struggled badly and was replaced by Jackson who is only 26 years old.

What do they know that we don’t? This isn’t the Jets or Saints franchises run by morons. Sean McVay is one of the smartest coaches in this league and McVay/Snead have been arguably as good identifying talent the last 2 years as anybody.

Not saying that we shouldn’t pursue him. The Rams not taking him seriously makes me wonder though.

I agree with this logic. If McVay doesn’t want him back on a relatively reasonable contract at a premium position, then it does warrant some reflection on how good of a player he actually is. I get that we can’t be too picky given the hole we have there, but it’d be nice to get a long term solution there and not have another Jawaan Taylor - a high priced, average player.

[ChiefsHawk]

Originally Posted by Semichief

I agree with this logic. If McVay doesn’t want him back on a relatively reasonable contract at a premium position, then it does warrant some reflection on how good of a player he actually is. I get that we can’t be too picky given the hole we have there, but it’d be nice to get a long term solution there and not have another Jawaan Taylor - a high priced, average player.

That's why you get a contract that makes it easier to cut him if needed.