Do you want Hootie on Texansplanet?

[Hammock Parties]

Inquiring minds want to know.

[doomy3]

Originally Posted by Phobia

You're really still making this argument? Hootie, don't smoke dope unless somebody else is smoking dope first. Then we're going to look the other way.

The probationary terms were designed to make Hootie a kinder, gentler user of this site... at least, I presume that was the intention. He was told to avoid those people. THAT INCLUDES RESPONDING TO THEIR BAITING. Why didn't he put those people on ignore? There really is no excuse for Hootie. If he really wanted to be on ChiefsPlanet, he would have obeyed the terms. He didn't.

You, Patteu, nor anybody else will ever convince me that any of this is somehow my fault.

I'm honestly done responding to this thread because it has become clear that you aren't going to reverse your decision no matter how many people want you to. It's counterproductive to keep rehashing the same things here.

The terms were ridiculous if he was told not to even respond to attacks from other people. That is insane on this board.

But again, I like you personally and I don't want to continue arguing with you about this, because it really doesn't matter ultimately. If you and you alone feel that Hootie shouldn't be here, then it looks like that is enough.

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by frazod

Yeah, I'm sure your pennies on the dollar December sell-off was a real boon for you. Sure has done wonders for your sunny disposition.

Only in your world is being successful at something worthy of ridicule. Why don't you make fun of me because my dick is too big or because my house is too nice while you're at it?

[dirk digler]

Saul would you agree that ****ing a girl that was passed out is rape?

Also I remember hootie bragging about how he would **** chicks when he has an STD.

I know he is young and probably says and does stupid things but that still doesn't excuse it.

[O.city]

Damn, CP has gotten intense today.

[Frazod]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

From last year's douche contest, no less (oh the irony):

Correct me if i'm wrong, Hootie'sSugarDaddy, but aren't those threads about a year old?

Is Hootie your kid? Cousin? Gay lover? I mean, there have been people I've defended here over the years (although not so much from things the admitted and bragged about), but I was never so devoted/lovestruck/queer for them that I held a grudge over it for a year. And only with one person, too. What's up with that Saul? I guess you hate me as much as your gaga for Pootie.

Did he hit your G spot or something?

[FAX]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Flopnuts owned his by pleading guilty, apologizing to those who were offended and accepting his ban. Pleading guilty alone isn't owning it. Reversing your decision, apologizing to Hootie, and letting Hootie sink or swim as a regular member instead of a second class citizen would be owning it. Of course, if apologizing to the guy would be too humbling, I'd personally be satisfied if you reversed the decision on the basis of overwhelming board sentiment and let Hootie have a fresh start as a member without a bullseye on his back.

Since I'm unqualified to take sides on this or practically any other issue, this actually sounds pretty rational.

But, speaking as someone who really doesn't care one way or the other about any of this, it really does seem as though Mr. Hootie is treated differently than other posters. Some people on this board just don't like other people on this board. It's human nature. I, for example, cannot bear Mr. gblowfish and his wacky "10 things" threads. I fully expect to see a "10 things" I did this week thread from now until the end of time as we know it. That would be okay, of course, were it not for the fact that sometimes in life there are 11 things and sometimes there are only 9 things. Heck, sometimes there are only 5 or 6 things. It stretches credulity, in fact, that a person encounters 10 things week after week after week with no deviation whatsoever. Yet, we get 10 things regardless of whether or not 10 things are warranted. I assume that Mr. gblowfish has 10 toes. Coincidence? I shall leave that for you to determine.

Meanwhile, I understand that Mr. Hootie and Mr. frazod and Mr. Dartgod and Mr. CrazyCoffee don't see eye to eye. In fact, it appears that Mr. Hootie is equally at home pissing in Planet Cheerios as he is in the shower. However, I fail to see the distinction between his board behavior and that of many other posters whom I shall not name for fear of getting my own ass banned to hell and gone.

Frankly, this whole deal sounds like Mr. Hootie slobbered on somebody's finger when he kissed the ring.

FAX

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Phobia

You're really still making this argument? Hootie, don't smoke dope unless somebody else is smoking dope first. Then we're going to look the other way.

The probationary terms were designed to make Hootie a kinder, gentler user of this site... at least, I presume that was the intention. He was told to avoid those people. THAT INCLUDES RESPONDING TO THEIR BAITING. Why didn't he put those people on ignore? There really is no excuse for Hootie. If he really wanted to be on ChiefsPlanet, he would have obeyed the terms. He didn't.

You, Patteu, nor anybody else will ever convince me that any of this is somehow my fault.

It's not your fault that he made those posts. That said, you're acting like an NBA referee who keeps calling carrying on one player while never calling it on any other player in the league while pointing to the wording in the rule book that defines a carry and saying that it isn't your fault he carried the ball. Every player in the league carries the ball every time it's brought up court, but it's just that one player who keeps getting whistled.

What is your fault is your selective interpretation and enforcement of the rules.

Originally Posted by Setsuna

I didn't say command them, I'd strongly encourage it. I feel like you showed favoritism or a lack of objectiveness to a member of the forum by allowing the people he was supposed to stay away from, to respond to him unprovoked. I'm sure that happened on more than one occasion. And vice-versa. Needless to say, I bet you were surprised he lasted 3 weeks let alone 3 days.

He didn't last 3 weeks. He got banned for 2 days almost immediately after coming back.

I feel like you set him up to fail. Which is underhanded and manipulative.

The terms of the probation were laid out via PM from DaFace. I didn't have anything to do with those original terms. So, if they're underhanded and manipulative then you're going to have to take that up with DaFace who is the fairest mod in the history of ChiefsPlanet if you ask anybody including Hootie.

You're still telling me that I should suggest to Frazod and Dartgod that they should watch their step around Hootie since Hootie is on probation and he's been instructed to avoid them. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Saul would you agree that ****ing a girl that was passed out is rape?

He didn't **** a passed out girl. He met up with one of his exes at a bar. She wanted to bang him. They both got drunk, went home, and had sex. They have had sex since then, and they are still friends to this day from what I understand. He didn't rape anyone.

[Frazod]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Only in your world is being successful at something worthy of ridicule. Why don't you make fun of me because my dick is too big or because my house is too nice while you're at it?

Yeah, and you've been using your big dick to make sweet love to your wonderful wife in your big house all weekend long.

Oh wait - that's not right. You've been here, arguing with fatloserdivorceddrugaddictwifeabuser.

That must be some idyllic existence you've got there. Must be - you're obviously so content and happy - joy practically oozes off my monitor when you call me a drugged out wife abuser.

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by frazod

Correct me if i'm wrong, Hootie'sSugarDaddy, but aren't those threads about a year old?

Is Hootie your kid? Cousin? Gay lover? I mean, there have been people I've defended here over the years (although not so much from things the admitted and bragged about), but I was never so devoted/lovestruck/queer for them that I held a grudge over it for a year. And only with one person, too. What's up with that Saul? I guess you hate me as much as your gaga for Pootie.

Did he hit your G spot or something?

Those posts were less than 11 months old. I don't really give a shit about defending him. I give a shit about calling out you for being a piece of shit. You're always the victim in your own mind, so I realize that you can't differentiate the two.

[|Zach|]

This is a great idea. I don't have qualms with his banning but don't really dislike the guy at all. I hope he takes it and runs with it.

Originally Posted by Saul Good

It's not your fault that he made those posts. That said, you're acting like an NBA referee who keeps calling carrying on one player while never calling it on any other player in the league while pointing to the wording in the rule book that defines a carry and saying that it isn't your fault he carried the ball. Every player in the league carries the ball every time it's brought up court, but it's just that one player who keeps getting whistled.

What is your fault is your selective interpretation and enforcement of the rules.

That's a pretty good analogy and it's completely accurate but it doesn't account for probation. Let's make up another analogy involving popping on a piss test and a player being on probation.

[Dartgod]

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

it's not warranted. It was incredibly personal and vile. Not everything on this site is public, and decisions are not always up for public debate. I understand the sentiment but if people here think they can do a better job they have 2 options. Apply for mod status, or start their own site.

I really mean no disrespect with that statement, it's just fact.

I want to apply for mod...











...so I can ban everyone who is crying about Hootie being banned.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

He didn't **** a passed out girl. He met up with one of his exes at a bar. She wanted to bang him. They both got drunk, went home, and had sex. They have had sex since then, and they are still friends to this day from what I understand. He didn't rape anyone.

If that is true my apologies to Hootie.