Glazer: KC called Cleveland regarding Quinn.

[BigVE]

Just reported it on FOX NFL Sunday...NO LINK. Hmmmm.

[ArrowheadHawk]

Since when is a late first round unproven QB worth two picks?

[milkman]

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding

Cleveland would be smart to take your #1 pick, plus lets say a #5. Chances are its going to be a really low pick.

Don't be shy, just say it.

We are going to get that #1 overall.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I agree with you.

They've made the investment for Anderson.

I think we'd have to give a 1 and a 3, but I'd do that.

Exactly.

We get a top notch QB potentially, but we're paying him like a #21 overall pick, rather than a #1 overall pick. Matt Ryan makes more than Tom Brady.

We're not getting Quinn for anything less than what the Vikings paid for Jared Allen.

A high 1st and a 3rd for Quinn makes sense for this franchise.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Hootie

I'd give our #1 overall for Quinn...

No doubt in my mind. I like him better than Stafford, and we won't have to pay him Tom Brady money.

Logistically speaking, it makes PERFECT sense. He'll have learned the ropes for two years, and he's being paid as a late 1st round pick, rather than an elite QB (like we'd have to pay if we took one #1 overall)...

I'd give our 1st and 4th without flinching.

Me too. I would jump on that like a fat chick on a donut.

[BigVE]

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk

Since when is a late first round unproven QB worth two picks?

Not normally but if you think about it in terms of MONEY think about this: IF we get the number one pick next year and pick up, say, Stafford from UGA how much money will HE be making? Dollar for dollar I would take Quinn.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk

Since when is a late first round unproven QB worth two picks?

Everyone knows Brady Quinn was a top 5 pick that fell...

Would you take Aaron Rodgers for our 1st next season?

Exactly.

[BigChiefFan]

We are most likely giving up a top five pick for a player who has just as many question marks as a rookie and he's older-no thanks.

[kcxiv]

I like Quinn, but i wouldnt give a first rounder. Not when the Chiefs can potentially pick number 1 in the draft. A 2 and a 5 maybe.

[banyon]

Yeah, see if they'll take LJ and a #2.

[Cosmos]

With Dick Curl on board, there is no hope for the future.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by BigVE

Not normally but if you think about it in terms of MONEY think about this: IF we get the number one pick next year and pick up, say, Stafford from UGA how much money will HE be making? Dollar for dollar I would take Quinn.

Only because from a potential standpoint, they are both very similar.

Except Stafford will get $40M guaranteed.

[Sure-Oz]

I'm not sold on getting rid of a top 5 pick, now if it was in the 13-20 range sure, but we all know we arent going to win more than 4 games. I won't bitch if we trade for Quinn though

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

We are most likely getting up a top five pick for a player who has just as many question marks as a rookie and he's older-no thanks.

older?! Haha. He's what, 25??

Yeah, we'll get a top pick and if we use it on a QB we're going to commit $40M guaranteed...

I'll take Quinn and his 5 year, $9M contract and potential to be a franchise QB over our #1 overall and a 3rd round pick.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by banyon

Yeah, see if they'll take LJ and a #2.

There is no difference between LJ and Jamal Lewis...other than the fact Jamal Lewis might be better.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Cosmos

With Dick Curl on board, there is no hope for the future.

The great thing is that Quinn has received some actual NFL coaching for two years already.