Alex Smith = Playmaker

[BossChief]

Just an amazing job in this first half of football to weather the storm of losing Charles and stepping his game up to a level many of us thought we would never see.

Worth every penny of 2 second round picks.

If they give him an extension next week, I'm ok with it.

PLAYMAKER

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by tk13

There's some serious trolling going on in here. Some of you are truly miserable people.

Yep. My entire dislike of Alex D. Smith was based around the fact I thought he would be useless in the postseason.

Shit, he was the only reason we had a chance today.

[ceebz]

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Thanks Reid

Yeah, I've come to realize that Reid's play-calling and time management will always be an obstacle to overcome.

[Mav]

Here is the post that should end this stupid debate.

Raise your hand if when Jamal Charles laid on that turf, and Andy Reid walked out, if you said, pfff, no big deal. We got this.


There are no hands raised, and if it is, you are full of shit. I am the biggest PRO ALEX SMITH GUY on the planet. For those who don't know, when I started here, my user name was ALEX SMITH FAN. And im NOT a troll account.

I said, the Chiefs are ****ed.

They scored 44 points without Jamal Charles.

The qb threw 4 tds, no picks, and 380 yards and accounted for about 440 yards of offense.

That's FRANCHISE qb numbers.

[Mav]

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead

Yep. My entire dislike of Alex D. Smith was based around the fact I thought he would be useless in the postseason.

Shit, he was the only reason we had a chance today.

I defended you on that point earlier.

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Sure it's hard to do, that's why you need an elite QB. Just like its hard to lead your team to a victory from a 4 score deficit. Some guys can do it, others get traded to the Chiefs.

bingo, pretty much sums it up.

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...ith-highlights


Alex Smith

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

I defended you on that point earlier.

Embrace me as a brother.

[Jimmya]

Bingo...that is why Smith isn't starting in San Francisco

[BossChief]

If we get Kelce back healthy and add a tight end like Amaro or Ebron or a receiver like Lee, this offense is gonna explode next year.

Alex will have 4000+ yards and 30+ touchdowns.

Not saving a good tight end held us back most of the year.

[ceebz]

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

Here is the post that should end this stupid debate.

Raise your hand if when Jamal Charles laid on that turf, and Andy Reid walked out, if you said, pfff, no big deal. We got this.


There are no hands raised, and if it is, you are full of shit. I am the biggest PRO ALEX SMITH GUY on the planet. For those who don't know, when I started here, my user name was ALEX SMITH FAN. And im NOT a troll account.

I said, the Chiefs are ****ed.

They scored 44 points without Jamal Charles.

The qb threw 4 tds, no picks, and 380 yards and accounted for about 440 yards of offense.

That's FRANCHISE qb numbers.

Honestly, no bullshit here, I thought the Chiefs still weren't out of it. I think Davis is quite talented and I didn't (still don't) think the Colts' defense is very good.

Did I think it would limit the playbook? Yes. Did I think it would kill any dynamism the Chiefs' offense had? Yes. I still thought they could win though.

Now, you answer me this: with a 28 point lead and basically the entire second half yet to play; isn't it still the offenses responsibility to be efficient and put points on the board? (The Chiefs scored a total of 6 points after the Davis TD reception BTW)

[Mav]

Originally Posted by BossChief

If we get Kelce back healthy and add a tight end like Amaro or Ebron or a receiver like Lee, this offense is gonna explode next year.

Alex will have 4000+ yards and 30+ touchdowns.

Not saving a good tight end held us back most of the year.

I think people underestimate that point. Fasano, and McGrath are okay. But they offer almost no game changing ability.

Remember that 3rd and Short where they ran that middle screen to Fasano? That was the slowest four yards in the history of football. It was timed with a sun dial.

[MeatRock]

Originally Posted by ceebz

Honestly, no bullshit here, I thought the Chiefs still weren't out of it. I think Davis is quite talented and I didn't (still don't) think the Colts' defense is very good.

Did I think it would limit the playbook? Yes. Did I think it would kill any dynamism the Chiefs' offense had? Yes. I still thought they could win though.

Now, you answer me this: with a 28 point lead and basically the entire second half yet to play; isn't it still the offenses responsibility to be efficient and put points on the board? (The Chiefs scored a total of 6 points after the Davis TD reception BTW)

When did we lose Davis?

[laughsatyou907]

Originally Posted by jd1020

ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz

Keep trying to put it on one side of the ball.

Lose a 28 point lead...

Thats a team failure.

Do you even read what you say?

[Jimmya]

I agree ceebz. ...it is the o's responsibility to at least milk the clock and put a few points on the board.

[ceebz]

Originally Posted by MeatRock

When did we lose Davis?

Sometime late in the 4th quarter. Happened on the Chiefs' 2nd to last drive.