Football Jamaal Lewis Available

Ronnie Cruz · 02-17-2010, 05:12 PM

The Cleveland Browns announced their release of veteran running back Jamal Lewis Wednesday as the team continues its makeover under new president Mike Holmgren.

Lewis' future in the NFL is uncertain. He initially said that 2009 would be his final season. But after spending time on injured reserve with post-concussion syndrome, Lewis later hinted that he may be open to returning.

Either way, it won't be for the Browns. The release makes Lewis an unrestricted free agent and free to sign with any team if he doesn't retire.

Lewis rushed for 10,607 yards and 58 touchdowns in his career with the Browns and Baltimore Ravens. He made the Pro Bowl in 2003 when he rushed for 2,066 yards with Baltimore.

His legs are real tired, but he has continued to be somewhat effective late in his career. He fits the physical mold for the type of back people would like to spell Charles. Worth a look? Or are two Jamaals too many for one backfield, in this case?

02-17-2010, 05:12 PM	Topic Starter
Ronnie Cruz Registered User Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	Jamaal Lewis Available The Cleveland Browns announced their release of veteran running back Jamal Lewis Wednesday as the team continues its makeover under new president Mike Holmgren. Lewis' future in the NFL is uncertain. He initially said that 2009 would be his final season. But after spending time on injured reserve with post-concussion syndrome, Lewis later hinted that he may be open to returning. Either way, it won't be for the Browns. The release makes Lewis an unrestricted free agent and free to sign with any team if he doesn't retire. Lewis rushed for 10,607 yards and 58 touchdowns in his career with the Browns and Baltimore Ravens. He made the Pro Bowl in 2003 when he rushed for 2,066 yards with Baltimore. His legs are real tired, but he has continued to be somewhat effective late in his career. He fits the physical mold for the type of back people would like to spell Charles. Worth a look? Or are two Jamaals too many for one backfield, in this case?
Posts: 66