So it begins..Browns might take Trubisky 1st overall?

[RunKC]

Adam Schefter

Just had an NFL exec tell me, "Don't be surprised if Myles Garrett isn't the No. 1 pick." Exec convinced a QB is in discussion at No. 1.

Trubisky, Watson and Mahomes will all be gone by pick 13.

[RealSNR]

I had no clue why he wasn't going top 5.

Cam Newton only played a year in college. It's been done before. He looks like a great prospect.

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

I had no clue why he wasn't going top 5.

Cam Newton only played a year in college. It's been done before. He looks like a great prospect.

He played one year at Auburn but that's because he transferred from another program.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

He played one year at Auburn but that's because he transferred from another program.

So? Trubisky was a backup since 2013 at UNC.

Cam was a backup at Florida for Urban Meyer's Tebow team. That's hardly a QB breeding ground or a place where he's going to get the necessary tools to become pro ready.

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

So? Trubisky was a backup since 2013 at UNC.

Cam was a backup at Florida for Urban Meyer's Tebow team. That's hardly a QB breeding ground or a place where he's going to get the necessary tools to become pro ready.

He won a national championship with Blinn College in TX before going to Auburn. He played a lot of football that culminated in his second national championship with Auburn.

[RunKC]

Also from Schefter..

Cleveland has not made up its mind at No. 1, per source. Split opinions. Some like Myles Garrett, some like Mitchell Trubisky. We will see.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Also from Schefter..

Cleveland has not made up its mind at No. 1, per source. Split opinions. Some like Myles Garrett, some like Mitchell Trubisky. We will see.

Leaks to try to convince someone to trade up.

Nobody is going to bite (or if they do, it will have nothing to do with this stupid leak but rather a king's ransom to get Garrett) - Garrett is by far and away the class of the field this year and the Browns have another pick at 12 with no clear distinction between the QBs.

They can take the consensus #1 player in the draft (by a TON) and still get a QB that is as likely to be successful as Trubisky is at 12, if only because they're all dice rolls in this draft.

Stupid article is stupid.

[Coochie liquor]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Leaks to try to convince someone to trade up.

Nobody is going to bite (or if they do, it will have nothing to do with this stupid leak but rather a king's ransom to get Garrett) - Garrett is by far and away the class of the field this year and the Browns have another pick at 12 with no clear distinction between the QBs.

They can take the consensus #1 player in the draft (by a TON) and still get a QB that is as likely to be successful as Trubisky is at 12, if only because they're all dice rolls in this draft.

Stupid article is stupid.

This. Either draft him, or trade the pick for capital next year

[vailpass]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Leaks to try to convince someone to trade up.

Nobody is going to bite (or if they do, it will have nothing to do with this stupid leak but rather a king's ransom to get Garrett) - Garrett is by far and away the class of the field this year and the Browns have another pick at 12 with no clear distinction between the QBs.

They can take the consensus #1 player in the draft (by a TON) and still get a QB that is as likely to be successful as Trubisky is at 12, if only because they're all dice rolls in this draft.

Stupid article is stupid.

^^^

[CoMoChief]

Doesn't surprise me at all.

Because they're the Browns.

[stumppy]

What do you want to bet Dorsey has narrowed the list down to 3 or 4 QB's and one way or another they are all gone before he can even trade up.

[Chief Northman]

Originally Posted by stumppy

What do you want to bet Dorsey has narrowed the list down to 3 or 4 QB's and one way or another they are all gone before he can even trade up.

Very likely. Shit for supply, much for demand.
Shit is in demand.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by stumppy

What do you want to bet Dorsey has narrowed the list down to 3 or 4 QB's and one way or another they are all gone before he can even trade up.

Looks like Clay and a few others will get their wish.

QBs will come off the board earlier than we think. The Chiefs will stand pat, and they absolutely should. Trading up for anybody but Trubisky is a bad idea, and even then Trubisky is not worth a huge trade up to the mid teens or further.

So we'll wait until 2018. And do the exact same thing when the top 4 come off the board before we can even muster up the gumption to get on the phone.

No QBs for the Chiefs.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by stumppy

What do you want to bet Dorsey has narrowed the list down to 3 or 4 QB's and one way or another they are all gone before he can even trade up.

"Trubisky, Watson and Mahommes will all be picked in the top 10 and at some point the Chiefs will select Nate Peterman, Brad Kaaya or Josh Dobbs"

With every day that gets closer to the draft, that sentence becomes more and more true.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by RunKC

"Trubisky, Watson and Mahommes will all be picked in the top 10 and at some point the Chiefs will select Nate Peterman, Brad Kaaya or Josh Dobbs"

With every day that gets closer to the draft, that sentence becomes more and more true.

Then **** this team and its inability to solve the QB position outside of 49ers QBs.