|
![]() |
#2 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Casino cash: $-1763546
|
For Thuney it depends if you think Kinnard or Carvin can take his place. If not G is certainly a place to look. Keep churning the talent at WR. DT can always use bodies as well.
|
Posts: 13,272
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Simmons @ 32 > Fisher @ 1
Join Date: Jan 2015
Casino cash: $303065
|
|
Posts: 7,424
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $-1390389
|
This is really hard to project bc guys like Omenihu and Tranquill could be excellent and then we don’t know if they come back or not
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley |
Posts: 52,041
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
Casino cash: $-1870960
|
|
Posts: 52,823
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
Casino cash: $-1870960
|
You're probably looking at OG, S, DT.
|
Posts: 52,823
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Casino cash: $-1129600
|
|
Posts: 874
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
Casino cash: $-1870960
|
|
Posts: 52,823
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Casino cash: $8631048
|
If Thuney wants to keep playing after this year he’ll be back. He might eventually have to take a pay cut. But he just had maybe his best year ever at 30. He’s going to retire here
Sneed is gone We bring back Gay OR Trainquill depending on how the year goes Sneed I’m 90% sure on. Gay/Tranquill like 50/50. Veach doesn’t resign our own unless they are elite or come back for the league min. And next offseason Creed, Trey, Bolton, AND Toney (unlikely) will all be eligible for extensions |
Posts: 2,557
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Black Bob's daddy
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: under the sun
Casino cash: $-1069600
|
I don't necessarily see any huge glaring needs like a year ago when it was painfully obvious that WR, DE, and OT were all significant needs and at the very least needed bodies. It's too early to say for sure how well those needs were addressed, but at the very least there is competition there. That being said, in no particular order I see the following positions as possible needs depending on a number of factors:
CB - Depends on what happens with Sneed. If he's allowed to walk CB becomes a likely need. Won't necessarily be the top need but more depth will be needed. LB - Depends on what happens with Tranquil and/or Gay, as well as the development of Chenal. DT - In the unlikely event Jones is allowed to walk this easily becomes need #1 because the talent at the position is incredibly sparse after Jones. If he's signed then it falls down the list a bit. WR - I've learned enough to not expect anything out of Rice this year. If he puts up 300 yards and 1-2 TDs that will be all you can really expect. Now, Moore and Toney have to show some significant growth this year. In the unlikely event neither one steps up and/or deal with injuries WR possibly becomes a rd 1-2 need yet again in KC, but hopefully that isn't the case. Still would be a wise move to add a WR no later than rds 3-4 nearly every year. TE - Doubt Fortson can stay healthy, and Gray isn't an ideal #1 TE but is a good #2. Might want to finally consider looking for Kelce's eventual replacement. DE, S, and OG don't appear as high up on the board in needs IMO but still could be considered depending on things that transpire in 2023. Overall they should be in a good spot to hopefully stick to their board and just go BPA next year. |
Posts: 5,365
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Black Bob's daddy
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: under the sun
Casino cash: $-1069600
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 5,365
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $1200400
|
Quote:
Assuming Jones gets 30m a year, with a cap hit of ~15m in his first year, there is a decent amount of money to play with. The offense is still intact from 2023, the defense you're losing Gay and Sneed as noted by others already. Spotrac has estimated contract values for both Gay and Sneed around the 7m a year mark. That in itself seems surprisingly affordable, but I still think they let Gay go. They may have to leave some cushion on the 2024 cap, or front load Jones deal, to make space for the future re-signings. The other situation to watch is MVS, he would be easy to walk away from in 2024, which would free up a decent chunk of cash to go after a highly paid weapon, if the Chiefs wanted to go down that route. |
|
Posts: 2,492
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Simmons @ 32 > Fisher @ 1
Join Date: Jan 2015
Casino cash: $303065
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 7,424
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $1200400
|
Quote:
The problem with re-signing Gay is not his contract, it’s so you want to also sign Bolton the next year and have ~20m per year invested in 4 linebackers in 2025? |
|
Posts: 2,492
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Generational Player
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Honolulu
Casino cash: $580400
|
An elite safety with range would really help the defense.
Speed at WR.
__________________
My Adopt A Chief-Hollywood Brown |
Posts: 9,850
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|