Chiefs Better to be lucky than good.... - Page 5

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 06:19 PM

The Chiefs were lucky to beat the Jags. That's just plain and simple. A dropped INT on a Foles duck, dropped INT by the Chiefs in the end zone to prevent a Jax score, an iffy call that could have been ruled a TD but was ruled a fumble by Jax, wide WIDE open receivers missed by Bortles....

For the most part Jax outplayed KC on both sides of the ball. They ran all over our defense and had guys open deep all game long. The Chiefs made some key stops when they absolutely had too but they were lucky to walk away with a win this game.

Nick Foles is not better than Smith. So let's just end that talk now. He looked like a statue in the pocket, missed wide open guys for scores and didn't see open receivers. I know, no Ware, Maclin and eventually Kelce hurts. But you can tell his accuracy is not even close to what Smith's is. He did make a nice pass to Wilson for our 1 TD of the day.

All day long the Chiefs, particularly the defense played with their head in the clouds. Multiple penalties, terrible tackling and rather unimpressive coverage on special teams.

A win is a win is a win. I would rather be lucky than good but the fact is, we were not good today. We were lucky.

**lewdog** · 11-06-2016, 08:45 PM

Where you been Pete? Feels like you aren't posting much anymore.

milkman · 11-06-2016, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You've been "outplayed" for two year running.

No.

The Chiefs have had some good games and some bad games, but it's rare when they win a game this ugly.

They generally play well enough in wins that they looked like the team that should have won.

They sucked big balls in this game.

If they weren't playing a hapless team, they would have lost, and should have lost this game.

**petegz28** · 11-06-2016, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog

Where you been Pete? Feels like you aren't posting much anymore.

watching the Denver Cheats v. the Oakland Convicts

oaklandhater · 11-06-2016, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

No.

The Chiefs have had some good games and some bad games, but it's rare when they win a game this ugly.

They generally play well enough in wins that they looked like the team that should have won.

They sucked big balls in this game.

If they weren't playing a hapless team, they would have lost, and should have lost this game.

Beside the steelers game this was easily our worse effort of the season

11-06-2016, 06:19 PM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-845873	Better to be lucky than good.... The Chiefs were lucky to beat the Jags. That's just plain and simple. A dropped INT on a Foles duck, dropped INT by the Chiefs in the end zone to prevent a Jax score, an iffy call that could have been ruled a TD but was ruled a fumble by Jax, wide WIDE open receivers missed by Bortles.... For the most part Jax outplayed KC on both sides of the ball. They ran all over our defense and had guys open deep all game long. The Chiefs made some key stops when they absolutely had too but they were lucky to walk away with a win this game. Nick Foles is not better than Smith. So let's just end that talk now. He looked like a statue in the pocket, missed wide open guys for scores and didn't see open receivers. I know, no Ware, Maclin and eventually Kelce hurts. But you can tell his accuracy is not even close to what Smith's is. He did make a nice pass to Wilson for our 1 TD of the day. All day long the Chiefs, particularly the defense played with their head in the clouds. Multiple penalties, terrible tackling and rather unimpressive coverage on special teams. A win is a win is a win. I would rather be lucky than good but the fact is, we were not good today. We were lucky.
Posts: 132,163

11-06-2016, 08:45 PM	#61
lewdog Mod Team Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Valley of the hot as **** Casino cash: $-1328100	Where you been Pete? Feels like you aren't posting much anymore.
Posts: 46,293