Veach vindicated in Sneed trade

[JohnnyV13]

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...ue-quad-injury

Apparently, Sneed missed the last game and will miss the next game due to a quad injury. Sneed was terrific last season while performing despite injury concerns. Given the status of his knee, a big contract was a bad investment. Further, the ability to draft and develop DBs played a huge role in his decision-making.

Jaylen Watson was doing a great job replacing Sneed. While McDuffie was the one taking over the no. 1 corner job, it was Watson who moved into the lineup with Sneed's absence. Watson was a well above average corner before getting injured. Imagine the Chiefs cap situation if they tried to fit a deal for Sneed.

Would signing Trey Smith and Creed Humphry to extensions have been possible? I also doubt the CHiefs would now have the flexibility to add Hopkins. They had to get Tennessee to eat a lot of contract as it is. I think the Chiefs would have to have performed serious cap contortions to address the WR room if they had signed Sneed.

[Chief Roundup]

Veach did not need vindication. He did the right thing and any reasonable person knew it.

[Dunerdr]

Originally Posted by Mosbonian

Not going to go thru the whole thread....but are there really people in here going to bat for Dorsey?

Trying to compare what Veach has done to build a 3 time Super Bowl winner (back to back for 2 of them) to what Dorsey did here is silly.

It’s not beach vs Dorsey. Just some clowns trying to take credit away from Dorsey. Someone said he doesn’t get credit for kelce Andy does because he knew him years before the draft. And regardless of the revisionist history Mahomes is a Dorsey pick. Idgaf what the story says about Veach pouring the table for him. There’s a scout in every round pushing for his guy and scouts taking Andy film all the time. It’s called the off season.

[DRM08]

Originally Posted by TEX

Of course not now. But my premise was tha had he stayed in Kansas City, instead of getting in trouble and being kicked off the team, he would have had the numbers and the hardware to be considered. That was my point.

I think Kareem would have been a salary cap casualty. He would have wanted above $10M per year and the Chiefs would not be able to pay him. He would have been gone after the 2020 season.

[TwistedChief]

Originally Posted by TEX

IMO there's a decent chance that Hunt gets in also, IF he would not have gotten in trouble and never left KC. Not 1st ballot, but if he stayed healthy, he'd have the numbers and hardware.

I don’t think there’s much chance we would’ve resigned an expensive RB to a second contract, Hunt or not.

[jjchieffan]

Originally Posted by Mosbonian

Not going to go thru the whole thread....but are there really people in here going to bat for Dorsey?

Trying to compare what Veach has done to build a 3 time Super Bowl winner (back to back for 2 of them) to what Dorsey did here is silly.

It's not like anyone is saying that we should have kept Dorsey or anything like that. Just acknowledging the fact that the core of this team, Mahomes, Jones, Kelce and until the trade, Hill, were all Dorsey draft picks and are all headed to the hall of fame. It's okay to acknowledge that without saying that he's somehow the better GM and we should have kept him. Veach is the man! He took the roster to the next level after Dorsey rebuilt it from the ashes. We are all grateful for Veach and what he has accomplished.

[notorious]

Originally Posted by loochy

I don't .I really don't believe that a team gives another team "a deal". The deal is either valuable and acceptable by both teams or it isn't. I think teams solely look at the profit side of trades and not "helping buddy out" kind of stuff .

Think of it more as a "I'll concede a little here, just remember it down the road".

Sets up for a good working relationship.