Broncos news megathread

[ROYC75]

Discussion: All things Broncos.

[BroncoBuff]

Originally Posted by Chieftain

Donktards getting more creative by inventing arguments to show how their team has been 'superior' to the Chiefs throughout history.
Who gives a flying rat's butthole what they did in the 70s and 80s??

Chiefs own you, historically. In pretty much every metric except SB appearances. That will end next season. You will have nothing left to hold on to. Your franchise will never win 9 straight division titles and they sure as **** won't threepeat in the SB or go to 5 in 6 years.

Oh no, definitely not "throughout history." Never said anything even remotely like that. What is it with you guys and straw men?

In fact, there are THREE DISTINCT eras of ownership between our teams:

.

1960-1973 - Texans/Chiefs own
1974-2016 - Broncos own
2017 - present - Chiefs own

.

The two Texans/Chiefs eras are more master-bitch kind of ownerships ... ... but the Broncos era is both decisive and l o n g. I have the stats and the numbers to prove it.

But only AFTER someone asks, and I'm allowed to explain what team (modern SB era) is the greatest team ever. It's not who you think, and you'll definitely agree with me when I'm done

[BroncoBuff]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

What AFL team did the Packers beat in their first game of their alleged 3 peat? They didn't beat one because they didn't play one. How hard is that to comprehend?? The Superbowl was a matchup of the AFL champ vs the the NFL champ. Now AFC vs NFC champs. Had they played the AFL champs the year before Superbowl 1 and beat them, then it would be a fair comparison.

ding ding ding!

Best answer yet! Using the definition of "Super Bowl" to exclude the first of the Packers' 3 in a row.

I agree, point-for-point, but I reject it coming from anybody on the Planet. Everybody here wailed and gnashed their teeth when I made statistical comparisons excluding AFL games.

And it's not an "alleged 3-Peat." The Packers were World Champions three years in a row - the only 3-Peat ever. Never happened before or since, under any name.

And, heaven forbid I remind you, Chiefs haven't done it yet either.

[brdempsey69]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

Oh no, definitely not "throughout history." Never said anything even remotely like that. What is it with you guys and straw men?

In fact, there are THREE DISTINCT eras of ownership between our teams:

.

1960-1973 - Texans/Chiefs own
1974-2016 - Broncos own
2017 - present - Chiefs own

.

The only thing the Donkeys have OWNED is being the biggest "Charity Case" team in pro football history & there's not even a close 2nd to be found anywhere. Incidentally, that week 18 Charity gift the Donkeys got only magnified the Donkeys "Charity Case" label.

And you say "1974-2016 - Broncos own"? Do you mean just like Turd Elway's first 7 starts against KC where Elway went 4-3 and threw 3 TD's and 16 INT's?
Is that what Donktards define as 'ownage' or define as Elway carrying those '80's Donkeys teams?

You say "you guys just keep wailing on me and wailing on me, more and more, page after page. It doesn't say much for you guys........... ". Well what does it say for you when you keep trying to peddle your Donktard mythology (only to get it shot down by facts and evidence proving the opposite of what you are saying), along with all your other non-sensical and irrelevant blather?

It says you have ZERO credibility.

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

And it's not an "alleged 3-Peat." The Packers were World Champions three years in a row - the only 3-Peat ever. Never happened before or since, under any name.

Wrong again. No SB three-peat for the Packers and they were NOT world champions in 1965, they were NFL Champions. It's been documented that the AFL champs challenged the NFL Champions to a matchup in the early 1960's, but the NFL refused.

[RedinTexas]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

ding ding ding!

Best answer yet! Using the definition of "Super Bowl" to exclude the first of the Packers' 3 in a row.

I agree, point-for-point, but I reject it coming from anybody on the Planet. Everybody here wailed and gnashed their teeth when I made statistical comparisons excluding AFL games.

And it's not an "alleged 3-Peat." The Packers were World Champions three years in a row - the only 3-Peat ever. Never happened before or since, under any name.

And, heaven forbid I remind you, Chiefs haven't done it yet either.

For someone that claims to be a member of Mensa you seem incredibly dimwitted. The Packers were NFL champions in 1929,1930, & 1931.

[Clyde Frog]

Holy shit - "Mensa Muff" is back after getting completely eviscerated and embarrassed? Absolutely no shame to keep showing up here after being outed as a lying moron.

[rydogg58]

Originally Posted by Clyde Frog

Holy shit - "Mensa Muff" is back after getting completely eviscerated and embarrassed? Absolutely no shame to keep showing up here after being outed as a lying moron.

I love how these ****tards show back up to join the celebrations of us being the greatest team the NFL has ever seen. Even that dipshit Mensa Muff.

[jjchieffan]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

ding ding ding!

Best answer yet! Using the definition of "Super Bowl" to exclude the first of the Packers' 3 in a row.

I agree, point-for-point, but I reject it coming from anybody on the Planet. Everybody here wailed and gnashed their teeth when I made statistical comparisons excluding AFL games.

And it's not an "alleged 3-Peat." The Packers were World Champions three years in a row - the only 3-Peat ever. Never happened before or since, under any name.

And, heaven forbid I remind you, Chiefs haven't done it yet either.

Actually, the Chiefs have done exactly what the Packers did at this point. Two straight Superbowl win and a conference championship. Winning the Superbowl would actually surpass the Packers. They're currently tied

[Chieftain]

Modern NFL history starts with the SB era. The trophy of the leauge is literally called SUPER BOWL. Not the NFL Championship. The league counts the trophies in roman numerals and plasters them in the trophy logo. So, by my calculation (and everyone elses), no other team has won this trophy 3x in a row. The packers 1965 title doesn't count and should not count. Just like AFL titles don't count. It's the equivalent of winning the NFC title. A puberty entering human could understand this.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Chieftain

Modern NFL history starts with the SB era. The trophy of the leauge is literally called SUPER BOWL. Not the NFL Championship. The league counts the trophies in roman numerals and plasters them in the trophy logo. So, by my calculation (and everyone elses), no other team has won this trophy 3x in a row. The packers 1965 title doesn't count and should not count. Just like AFL titles don't count. It's the equivalent of winning the NFC title. A puberty entering human could understand this.

Dont waste your time trying to educate that piece of shit Cheating Donx turd. He has a habit of trying to change factual history in order to fit his narrative. Just remind him that the Broncos had to cheat in order to win the Super Bowl.

[brdempsey69]

Originally Posted by TEX

Dont waste your time trying to educate that piece of shit Cheating Donx turd. He has a habit of trying to change factual history in order to fit his narrative. Just remind him that the Broncos had to cheat in order to win the Super Bowl.

He can't be educated, but what can be done is put truth & evidence in front of him just for the sake of watching it blow his dick-head apart.

Notice that he has "anti-dempsey" in his avatar? All he's telling anyone is that he's anti-truth & anti-reality and can't stomach his Donktard mythology getting shredded & that multiple truth bombs have been planted in his dick-head and he can't get them out.

And THAT, I can wear like a badge of honor.

[BroncoBuff]

Originally Posted by RedinTexas

For someone that claims to be a member of Mensa you seem incredibly dimwitted. The Packers were NFL champions in 1929,1930, & 1931.

Damn, you're right. I was parroting an article I just read. Would've been easy to check before posting on the battlefield that is the Planet. FWIW that's not a failure of intellect, it's just a failure to check the research, at worst it's just sloppy.

Originally Posted by Chieftan

Modern NFL history starts with the SB era. The trophy of the leauge is literally called SUPER BOWL.

We disagree, I say it's the merger. A full 26 team inter-play schedule, that was the New World. The "Super Bowl" wasn't even called the Super Bowl, the first one didn't even sell out. But there's no "right answer," so ....

dempsey, I don't know what to say to you. I've tried numerous ways to get you to treat me like a human being, but that's just not gonna happen. You really should talk with somebody about this Broncos-hate of yours.


Nobody had any response to my Mahomes' theory?.....

I'm percolating a theory now that Mahomes has just got lazy. He's SO good now, that he expends just enough effort to win games, nothing more. That's why you have so many close games, but still went 15-2 (15-1 really). That's also why Bo freaking Nix's offense put up more points this year than Mahomes' offense.

Mahomes sees no point in embarrassing other teams by running up the score.