Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
WTF is this notion of an 'objective comparison?'
One side is skeptical of how convinced some are that Geno 'absolutely cannot miss, . . . .but if he does no big deal.'
Those convinced rebut with 'yeah, well people weren't sold on RGIII last year.'
'Yeah we were.'
'Well Kiper wasn't, and you don't count because you saw lots and lots of RGIII'
AGAIN, FTR, I'm not anti-Geno. I'm anti-failure to perform due diligence and cruise into the draft with this 'he's gonna be great, everyone else sucks, and it doesn't matter if he's a total bust because it's the gamble we HAVE TO take' attitude. That's just begging for him to be the next Akili Carr-Leaf.
|
Again, many HERE were completely sold on RG3 this time last year, even though many of the pundits weren't. Why? Because they had seen him play. A LOT.
Many of those same people are saying "Geno Smith isn't RG3" haven't seen Geno play even HALF the number of times they saw RG3.
Don't want me to call it objective comparison, fine. I'll call it ignorance instead.