Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler
Id like to see what Stanzi can do, considering we never gave him a chance last year. I dont really have a lot of faith in our coaching staff offensively though. Zorn is about the only one with a clue, but he can only do so much.
Crenell and Daboll, those guys collaborated before when Romeo's first tenure as a head coach ended in disaster.
I wanted a nose tackle to shore up that DL once and for all, but it looks like the better choice is to go after someone like Keeklee. Cant spell dude's name, but thats how you say it.
I wouldnt be averse to drafting Decastro at 11 either. Sure, its high to take a guard there, but if he's as good as theyre saying it would be pretty dumb to pass on that kind of talent, especially when it could turn our once laughable O-line into a freaking meat fortress with the addition of DeCastro and Winston.
Thats hard for me to pass up. I remember the 90's when the Chiefs had the best o-line in football. It got taken for granted by me, thats for sure.
|
Here's the deal: I'm not opposed to giving Stanzi a chance under center if he can earn it.
But I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Stanzi is not the next Tom Brady.
Doesn't mean I don't like him, I do. But he's probably not Tom Brady.
And I'm not going to sit on the sidelines of the QB market if I don't have to
simply because of Stanzi.
If you need a QB, you get a QB if you can.
I happen to think we can get a first-round talent at a bargain, simply because people are prejudiced against his age.