Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
Hard-working, chip-on-the-shoulder-attitude, intense training guys who played college football for at least three years, set a good example in the locker room, and come into the league with well-developed mechanics. Not a qualifier, but it helps if they came from a school that runs a pro offense.
Weeden's got all those things. So does Kirk Cousins.
As did Ricky Stanzi.
What does Weeden have that the other two don't besides a busy calendar full of extra sessions with the QBs coach/offensive assistants?
|
He's a winner.
He plays his best in big games.
He's clutch.
And he has a swagger that neither of those two can match, though I'd say Stanzi comes close.
But mostly, he's just much, much better. Surely you don't believe Weeden = Cousins or Stanzi?
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city
Direkshun, what are your thoughts on Osweiler?
I've watched alot of his stuff today after watching him on Grudens little talk thing. I am somewhat intrigued by the guy.
|
I really don't like Osweiler. I'm about as down on the guy as anybody on ChiefsPlanet.
I think he's a prospect you're going to need MULTIPLE years grooming. His outstanding size is pretty much just lankiness... I think his mechanics are awful, he's not that great in the face of pressure and he's logged less starting time than Tannehill.
I would avoid. But that's me.