Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants
It all stems from the old arguments we used to have how KU is a BB school. Naturally, MU fans would all start clamoring about how they're a "football" school. In reality, though, MU is just a school. One that is mediocre in both sports and severely lacking trophies.
Is MU football better than KU football right now? Obviously. Is MU more valuable to other conferences? Yes.
So they got that going for them.
|
Agreed, but to say the football programs of both of these schools hasn't been cyclic, would be dishonest.
History would show us, both have periods of being door mats, and then getting stronger and more competitive.
Neither has sustained a high level of play for more than a few years.