Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants
Which probably means there's going to be equal revenue sharing now that 2 of the 4 schools who voted against it are gone. If that's the case, I think MU did the right thing.
It could also mean that MU had no offer, although I think there was too much smoke for that to be true.
|
Hearing all the SEC chatter down here in the heart of SEC country, I'm 90% sure that the SEC had heavy interest in Mizzou.
I'm happy. My preference has been what is better for Kansas City over what is better for the University of Missouri. Mizzou staying in the Big XII, with equal revenue sharing, is best for KC.
(and doesn't preclude a future jump to the Big 10 lolololololol)