Quote:
Originally Posted by Metrolike
UK, UNC and KU are not defined by eras because they have always won. Duke and UCLA are defined by eras.
|
Always won WHAT?
Regular season games? Conference championships? Last I checked, Duke is less than 100 wins behind KU in program wins, yet KU has an advantage of 7 or 8 seasons played. Is it really that unreasonable to think that they wouldn't/couldn't have won 12 or 13 wins a year had they started pre-1900 like KU?
KU has a 20 year head start on UCLA, and yet UCLA is only approximately 400 wins behind. Is it really that unreasonable to think that they wouldn't/couldn't have won 16 games a year had they started pre-1900 like KU?
Is it still hard to win championships, or not?