Quote:
Originally Posted by Metrolike
The fact that you think UK falls behind anyone else says a lot about your knowledge of CBB history. UCLA is defined by one era, just like Duke (well, better than Duke seeing as they won in 95 too). It also happens that UCLA cheated to be the success they were, but that's not the point.
|
Like I said, it was for fun. Chill.
How's this?
1a-d = UNC, UK, UCLA, Duke. No particular order.
Arguments can be made for all of them, again depending on personal perspective.
What era is KU defined by?
The 50's, the 80's or now?
Funny how other programs are defined by eras, yet they all have more titles while having fewer years of history in which to do so.
KU's the oldest program of the group with the fewest championships.
I don't see how that makes them a "King" while the others are just "powerhouses."