Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuardian
So you would consider Marty's time in KC a failure? Or Marv Levey's time in Buffalo a failure? Andy Reid in Philly?
what you keep doing is changing the criteria so somehow your argument works. It doesn't.
The fact is this team just needs to learn how to win again, then think about GETTING into the postseason. Bringing in guys that served in the SAME CAPACITY for a SB dynasty in this same decade really isn't a bad idea in any way, shape, or form.
|
I'm not changing the criteria whatsoever. I have a nuanced argument and you're too stupid to understand it. That's not my problem.
Case in point: SB success replication.
Who do you offer for a rebuttal?
Andy Reid. Well, where else did he serve as HC and bring in all the guys he'd had elsewhere?
Marv Levy. Well, where else did he go to a SB other than Buffalo
Marty. How many SBs did he go to in Cleveland and KC combined?
By the way, the Marty example is particularly stupid, given that he was extremely flexible with the schemes (3-4 and 4-3, WCO, Air Coryell, Smashmouth) that he ran.
Maybe if you spent more time looking at NFL history rather than jamming a needle full of Deca into your ass you'd understand the argument that I'm making: you can't reinvent the wheel, especially when you are missing the key ingredients.
You know why Jimmy Johnson, Bill Walsh, Carmen Policy, Bill Parcells, etc. all failed when they left their area of initial success?
Because they didn't have Troy Aikman, Irvin, Emmitt Smith, Russell Maryland, Ken Norton, Joe Montana, Freddie Solomon, Dwight Clark, Jerry Rice, Roger Craig, Ricky Watters, Steve Young, John Taylor, Phil Simms, Carl Banks, LT, or Mark Bavaro.
We're trying to make a Patriots cake without sugar and flour. Good luck.