Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
I heard he got a paper cut on his throwing hand in Biology class once.
|
Nice turnaround, what I'm saying is that the guy was passing to a reciever in PRACTICE and dislocated his knee cap. That's what I'm saying, if you'd read what was in my post instead of what you wanted to read you'll see I said that theres a bunch more reasons why I believe Stafford is better than Sanchez. I believe that at that position you'll see that Maluaga is better than Sanchez in overall productivity. Sanchez IMO is no better than Lienart was with that system.
Here's some simple dialect for ya:
Matthew Stafford, no injuries during starts at Georgia.
Mark Sanchez, dislocated his knee in practice while throwing the ball.
Mark Sanchez in one year has had more injuries than Matthew Stafford in three.
AGAIN that is not the only reason I wouldn't take Sanchez over Stafford, I believe Sanchez is a good QB but not worthy of a top 3 pick. He comes from a system at USC that has been put in place there for many years and makes all QB's look good. Hell John David Booty looked good at USC, given not as good as Sanchez. Matt Stafford had a poor Oline, a bad defense, and almost as many wins as Sanchez. Sanchez had one of the best defenses, a good Oline, good recievers that didnt drop too many balls... hell he had USC! I know what Sanchez is capable of but if you're talking about Stafford or Sanchez my vote is Stafford, but hey thats what makes forums great they are prime places for you to voice your opinion and then have it mercilessly ridiculed by those whose opinions differ.