Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish
This started with HemiEd stating Herm brought in Ty Law, meaning that in hindsight it was a bad decision. I stated that the Law signing wasn't a bad signing at the time and many posters were happy with that. Some were downright ecstatic with the idea. There were posts claiming Law/Surtain would be the best CB pair in the NFL.
You replied, "but by the time Herm got Law to come play here, many knew Law was stop-gap at best." Which isn't true. Very few if any thought Law was going to decline so quickly. This place was hysteria with Law threads and how it was going to dramatically improve our defense. That's what my "Sure" response was directed at.
Then you come back with "Yea, everybody KNEW a 38 year old cornerback was the future for another decade, right?" Well nobody said anything about being the future for a decade. The argument was whether the Law signing was a bad move and attributable to Herm, and you turned it into "Well if you thought he'd be here for a decade you were stupid."
If that wasn't your intention then I apologize, but the way it looked, you were changing the parameters of the argument along the way.
|
Fair enough- I was wondering where all that came from-now I know you weren't basing everything directed at me, but rather the past comments of many individuals. Thanks for clearing that up.