Quote:
Originally Posted by ohiobronco2
Because they are better than the rest of the country is willing to give them credit for. I know that OSU isn't the best team in the country and they have laid a few eggs in the last two national championship games, but they are top 10 team. They are a completely different team than they were against USC. This Pryor kid is the real deal and now arguably the best RB in the country is healthy. OSU did lose the Penn St. game, but that was well in hand till a costly fumble at the very end. Hell if Terelle were to just lean forward, instead of trying to go outside, OSU would be a one loss team. I do believe that Oklahoma St is better than OSU, but I think OSU would beat Georgia, Boise St, and Utah. Don't tell me how great Georgia is, they should have lost to KY(You do know that KY is a powerhouse in basketball, not football). Don't get too happy about a down year for OSU (everybody), because they will be even better next year. You should see the recruiting class that is coming in next year.
|
Only in the Big 10 can someone use the phrase "well in hand" when referring to a 6-3 lead in the 4th quarter.
Just giving you a hard time, but seriously... I think OSU should be a few spots lower.... at least lower than tOSU (see what I did there), Mizzou, and Georgia.