[58-4ever]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Actually, Bradford would have to gain about 15 pounds, and even then he's going to be of a similar build to a QB who was knocked for a lack of size coming out.

Secondly, stop jerking off in the OU media guide. Bradford is not 6'5"

Finally, homer, it still doesn't address the fact that Bradford doesn't have to read a defense in that system, takes no snaps from under center, makes no difficult throws, and lack the arm strength of Aaron Rodgers, who had a good, but not great, arm.

So, other than trying to obfuscate the entire argument about Bradford vs. Stafford into a diversion about the size of Aaron Rodgers, which still doesn't hold up, you're completely right ****ing reeruned.

And it was the national media that said bradford was 6"5. whether he is 6"5 or 6"4, what's the f'n difference?