View Single Post
Old 09-26-2007, 01:19 AM   #13
'Hamas' Jenkins 'Hamas' Jenkins is offline
Now you've pissed me off!
 
'Hamas' Jenkins's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $7289572
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco
Why is that so funny?

He showed some flashes in 2004. Did pretty well in a rotation in 05 and had his best year and was very productive in 06, improving the weaknesses of his game (most importantly, breaking tackles) alot. He still was not a good system fit, he never had good vision and tripped up way too much, but he was a solid but not great player. In addition to the years of productive service he gave us, he also provided 90% of the compensation needed to get Bly. This is a very rational argument in favor of classifying him as a hit. Guys dont have to be Pro Bowlers to be hits, GoChiefs.
An early second round pick should be a damned good player to be considered a hit.

The only thing Bell has proven so far is that he can be an Ok scat back for a change of pace.

That's a heavy price to pay for a platoon running back.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 75,077
'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.'Hamas' Jenkins is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote