Quote:
Originally Posted by SAGA45
Here's the thing...Do you actually feel like you presented information that the CHIEFS didn't already know about, though? I'm not questioning the study itself. It's that you and a handful of others champion this study as if you stumbled on information that Burkholder and his staff weren't already aware of and hadnt already taken into account throughout their - from all accounts - meticulous evaluation process of Simmons' knee and his recovery progress.
It's one thing to prop up the study as a reason why YOU would personally pass on Simmons leading UP TO the draft. I get and got that part of it just fine. But now that the Chiefs have signed off on his rate of recovery by drafting him, that stance seems pretty weak and borders on you basically saying "Burkholder and his staff dont know wtf their doing! Meanwhile, I actually know wtf Im talking about!" ...which absolutely insane to me.
|
This is a thread about personal opinions and personal grades on the draft.
For me, the risk factor based on the information available to me is too high to give the Simmons pick a passing grade.
That’s, like, my opinion man. I believe the Chiefs staff when they say everything looks as good as it possibly could, in their opinions. And I hope they have some way of testing the explosion and strength and flexibility of the repaired joint. But until we hear something or see the player performing, I’ll need to see to believe.