Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
The study wasn't some random sample subject to a hypothesis and peer review. It's literally doctors looking at the entire population of NFL players who had the injury over more than 20 years and compiling that data. Then they presented the data to give you a meaningful resource on the effect of the injury on NFL players, not only as a whole, but by offense or defense, and skill or linemen.
If any of you actually took the time to read the paper for yourself, you'd see that. Instead of doing that, 15 of you decide to ask me to regurgitate the information and then you basically tell me to wipe my ass with it.
Well, I have. I hope the pick works out for the Chiefs, even if that data says it's unlikely.
But with that, I'm actually done contributing to this cesspool in any meaningful way. No more stats, no more player evals. It's not worth the time to give it to you.
|
What a disappointment for drama... I was expecting some huge haymakers or meltdowns with this kind of post, but outside of a couple of the usual ignorable reeruns, seems like this all stems from people trying having a pretty damn civil conversation?
I mean... yeah, the entire internet isn't going to agree all the time.
