Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
A couple of years ago, I said I was leaving for good. I'm not saying I'm leaving here now.
What's frustrating is that if you put in the time to find and share information and content here anymore, nobody really looks at it. If you formulate an opinion based on that information, you'll only be ridiculed, chastised, and rejected if it goes against what the Chiefs do.
|
I asked for the link and you shared it. And I appreciated that and legitimately went through the study and read a good portion of it. Hand to god.
But I understand statistics and sample sizes too. And I don't think that a study like that is entirely representative of the situation of this player as the Chiefs are evaluating him (I've already shared why that's the case earlier).
Do you really think the Chiefs aren't aware of this study? Has Andy Reid never come across it? And to be clear, this is an Andy Reid decision more than anyone else's.
We're not talking about evaluating a football player. We're not even really talking about an evaluation of the medicals.
We're talking about the process of Andy Reid and Brett Veach and whether they're foolhardy gunslingers caked in hubris who have a history of these longshot gambles. Or whether they have had as much success building a team as any other in the NFL. And whether they are capable of balancing the overall historicals around this injury, the Simmons-specific case, and the risk/reward.
I think they are and am fine with the pick regardless of the outcome.